AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE OF NON-AUDIT FEES DISCLOSURE IN AUSTRALIA

Authors

  • Rusmin Curtin University of Technology
  • J-L.W. Mitchell Van der Zahn Curtin University of Technology
  • Greg Tower Curtin University of Technology
  • Alistair Brown Curtin University of Technology

Abstract

This study examines the association between the magnitude of earnings management and auditor independence of 325 Australian listed firms. Auditor independence is the epicentre of this study’s analysis as this factor is considered to be a key determinant of earnings management. Our findings indicate the lack of a universal association between auditor independence and earnings management attributes. The main result is supported by tests using alternative measures of auditor independence. This result suggests that the provision of non-audit services by the incumbent auditor does not compromise independence. New regulatory initiatives, such as the Australian CLERP 9 law reforms, are thus queried.

References

Antle, R. and Demski, J.S. (1991) Contracting frictions, regulation and the structure of CPA firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(Supplement)pp1-24.

Antle, R., Gordon, E.A., Narayanamoorthy, G. andZhou, J. (2002) The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals.Unpublished manuscript.School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Arya, A., Glover, J.C. andSunder, S. (2003) Are unmanaged earnings always better for shareholders? Accounting Horizons, 17(Supplement)pp111-16.

Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R. andMayhew, B.W. (2003) Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3)pp611-39.

Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC)(2002) Submission on CLERP 9. Australian Securities & Investments Commission.

Balsam, S., Krishnan, G.V.andYang, J.S. (2003) Auditor industry specialization andearnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2)pp71-97.

Bartov, E.andBodnar, G.M. (1996) Alternative accounting methods, information asymmetry and liquidity: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review,71(3)pp397-418.

Bartov, E., Gul, F.A. andTsui, J.S.L. (2001) Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3)pp421-52.

Becker, C.L., DeFond, M.L., Jiambalvo, J. andSubramanyam, K.R. (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1)pp1-24.

Bernard, V.L.andSkinner, D.J. (1996) What motivates managers‘choice of discretionary accruals? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1-3)pp313-25.

Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H.andWelker, M. (2003) The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review, 78(3)pp641-78.Blake Dawson Waldron (2004) Corporate governance update. Retrieved:10 September 2004 from http://www.bdw.com

Chung, H.and Kallapur, S. (2003)Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 78(4)pp931-55.

Conyon, M.J. (2004) Corporate governance in Singapore: A case study.Unpublished manuscript.University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, P.A.

Cooper, D.R.andSchindler, P.S. (2003) Business Research Methods(8th Edition). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston, MA.Davidson, R., Goodwin-Stewart, J.andKent, P. (2005) Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting and Finance, 45(2)pp241-67.

Dechow, P.M., Sloan, R.G.andSweeney, A.P. (1995) Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2)pp193-225.

DeFond, M.L.andJiambalvo, J. (1994) Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1&2)pp145-76.

Dye, R.A. (1988) Earnings management in an overlapping generations model. Journal of Accounting Research, 26(2) pp 195-235.

Ferguson, M.J., Seow, G.S.andYoung, D. (2004) Non-audit services and earnings management: U.K. evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4)pp813-41.

Firth, M. (1997) The provision of non-audit services by accounting firms to their audit clients. Contemporary Accounting Research,14(2)pp1-21.

Downloads

Published

2009-06-30

How to Cite

Rusmin, Van der Zahn, J.-L. M. . ., Tower, G. ., & Brown, A. . (2009). AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE OF NON-AUDIT FEES DISCLOSURE IN AUSTRALIA. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 15(1), 91–111. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/57

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2009): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2009 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Most read articles by the same author(s)