FOLLOWING THE RULES? A MIXED MESSAGE FROM INDONESIA
Abstract
This study examines Indonesian Accounting Regulatory Compliance (IARC) by analysing companies' financial reports. Agency theory offers insights into the tendency of listed companies to follow the rules particularly to better ascertain whether or not differing ownership and governance structures lead to increased compliance. Analysis reveals a surprisingly low level of only 43 percent compliance with accounting rules. T- test and statistical regression analysis show that industry type (p-value of 0.013) and auditor type (0.036) are significant predictors of IARC.
The level of average compliance is significantly lower than the 88 percent compliance findings of a similar study by Tower, Hancock and Taplin (1999) for other Asian countries. The fundamental implication of the study is that much more regulatory intervention is needed. These findings add to the growing number of studies expressing concern about the issue of lack of effective supervision and sanctions in Indonesia's regulatory compliance (World Bank, 2005).
Downloads
References
Adam, R. and Mehran, H. (2003) Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies?Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, NY.
Al-Basteki, H. (1995) The voluntary adoption of international accounting standards by Bahraini corporations. Advances in International Accounting, 8 pp 46-64.
Anderson, R.A. (1998) Regulating corporate annual reports in Australia. Business and Economic History, 27 (2) pp 522-535.
Asian Development Bank, The (ADB) (2001) Corporate Governance and Finance in East Asia, a Study of Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand (Volume 2 country studies). Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Bapepam (2000) Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal nomor: Kep-06/PM/2000 tanggal 13 Maret 2000 tentang perubahan peraturan nomor VIII.G.7 tentang pedoman penyajian laporan keuangan. Bapepam.
Bapepam (2004) Surat Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal nomor: S-2167/PM/2004 tanggal 12 Juli 2004 perihal persetujuan draft peraturan pencatatan efek PT BEJ. Bapepam.
Barako, D.G., Hancock, P. and Izan, H.Y. (2006) Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14 (2) pp 107-125.
Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R. (1990) The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 15 (1) pp 72-87.
Beattie, V., McInnes, B. and Fearnley, S. (2004) A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28 (3) pp 205-236.
Berglof, E. and Claessens, S. (2004) Enforcement and Corporate Governance. Brunel University, Uxbridge.
Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. MacMillan Publishing, New York, NY.
Blagescu, M., Casas, L. and Lyod, R. (2005) Pathways to Accountability. One World Trust, London.
Brennan, N. (1995) Corporate finance over the past 25 years. Financial Management,24 pp 9-22.
Brennan, N. (2006) Board of Directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14 (6) pp 577-593.
Capital Market Law (1995) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 1985 tentang Pasar Modal. Government of Indonesia.
Chen, J. (2001) Ownership structure as corporate governance mechanism: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Economics of Planning, 34 (1-2) pp 53-72.
Choi, J. (2000) The Asian financial crisis: Moral hazard in more ways than one. International Finance Review, 1 (1) pp 3-14.
Choi, J.S. (1998) An investigation of the initial voluntary environmental disclosures made in Korean semi-annual financial reports. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (2) pp 614-622.
Claessens, C.A., Djankov, S. and Lang, L. (2000) The separation of ownership and control in East Asia corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1-2) pp 81-112.
Claessens, C.A., Djankov, S. and Lang, L.H.P. (1999) Who Controls East Asian Corporations?The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Claessens, S., Glassner, T. and Klingebiel, D. (2002) E-finance in emerging markets: Is leapfrogging possible? Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments,11 (1) pp 1-125.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L. (2000) The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 pp 81-112.
Company Law (1995) Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 1995 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Government of Indonesia.
Davidson, W.N., Nemec, C., Worrell, D.L. and Lin, J. (2002) Industrial origin of CEOs in outside succession: Board preference and stakeholder reaction. Journal of Management and Governance, 6 (4) pp 295-321.
Dierkes, M. and Preston, L.E. (1977) Corporate social accounting and reporting for the physical environment: A critical review and implementation proposal. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2 (1) pp 3-22
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
