ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH PERFORMANCE FOR UK AND IRISH ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE ACADEMICS

Authors

  • Greg Tower Curtin University of Technology
  • Rusmin Curtin University of Technology
  • Alistair Brown Curtin University of Technology
  • Alina Lee Curtin University of Technology
  • Emily Goforth Curtin University of Technology
  • Stacey Porter Curtin University of Technology
  • Glennda Scully Curtin University of Technology
  • Inderpal Singh Curtin University of Technology
  • Grantley Taylor Curtin University of Technology
  • Kenneth Ke Curtin University of Technology
  • Kevin Tian Curtin University of Technology
  • John Neilson Curtin University of Technology

Abstract

As a way of evaluating the successful implementation of a national research assessment, this study measures the individual research performance of 1,572 UK and Irish accounting and finance academics in the period 2004-05, twenty years after the implementation of the increased research focus in the UK through the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). The findings show surprisingly low levels of research productivity with the average accounting and finance academic publishing less than one half of one publication per annum. Using two measures of quality—Journal Impact Factors and the existence of Social Science Citation Index articles— the results reveal an even sparser picture with only 11 percent of these academics publishing their research in the most prestigious journals over a two year period. Doctoral-trained male professor or associate professor level academics from older universities were found to be more likely to produce high quality publications. These demographic data should raise concerns for research policymakers and research academics alike as they demonstrate a disparity in favour of an already well funded, high performing minority. The overall low level of accounting and finance academic productivity in the UK, after 20 years of regular scrutiny, raises major concerns about the efficacy of such all-encompassing national RAEs. Advocacy of a simpler, less intrusive approach such as the Dutch system is advanced.

References

Beattie, V. and Goodacre, A. (2004)Publishing patterns within the UK accounting and finance academic community.British Accounting Review, 36 (1)pp 744.

Bentley, J.T. (2003)Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers: A Literature Review. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics, Arlington, VA.

Brinn, T., Jones, M. and Pendlebury, M., (2001) Whydo UK accounting and finance academics not publish in top US journals?The British Accounting Review, 33 pp 22332.

Brown, R., Jones, M. and Steele, T.(2007)Still flickering at the margins of existence? Publishing patterns and themes in accounting and finance research over the last two decades.The British Accounting Review, 39 pp 12551.

Chan, K.C., Fok, R.C.W. andPan, M.S.(2000)Citation-based finance journal rankings: An update.Financial Practice and Education, 10(1)pp 13241.

Cooper, D.and Schindler, P. (2003)Business Research Methods (7thEd).McGraw Hill International, New York, NY.

Gee, K.P. and Gray, R.H. (1989) Consistency and stability of UK academic publication output criteria in accounting. The British Accounting Review,21(1)pp4354.

Geuna, A.and Martin, B.R. (2003)University research evaluation and funding: An International Comparison.Minerva, 41(4) pp277304.

Glover, S., Prawitt, D. and Wood, D.(2006)Publication records of faculty promoted at the top 75 accounting research programs.Issues in Accounting Education, 21(3)pp 195218.

Gray, R. and Helliar, C. (1994)UK accounting academics and publication: An exploration of observable variables associated with publication output.British Accounting Review, 26pp 23554.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham R. and Black, W. (1995)Multivariate Data Analysis (4th Ed).Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T.and Oppenheim, C.(2003)Mandated online RAE CVs linked to university eprint archives: Improving the UK research assessment exercise whilst making it cheaper and easier.Ariadne,35. Available atwww.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/.

Harzing, A. (2001) Of bears, bumble-bees, and spiders: The role of expatriates in controlling foreign subsidiaries.Journal of World Business, 36pp 36679.

Hasselback, J.R., Reinstein, A. and Schwan,E.S.(2000)Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty.Journal of Accounting Education, 18 pp7997.

Higher Education and Research Opportunities (HERO) (2002)RAE 2001, Research Assessment Exercise (RAE): Results, Submissions, Documentation.Retrieved:11 December 2007 from www.hero.ac.uk/rae/.

Higher Education and Research Opportunities (HERO) (2005)A Guide to the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise. Retrieved:4 April2005 from http://195.194.167.103/Pubs/other/raeguide.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-30

How to Cite

Tower, G. ., Rusmin, Brown, A. ., Lee, A. ., Goforth, E. ., Porter, S. ., Scully, G. ., Singh, I. ., Taylor, G. ., Ke, K. ., Tian, K. . ., & Neilson, J. . (2008). ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH PERFORMANCE FOR UK AND IRISH ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE ACADEMICS. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 14(1), 1–19. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/36

Most read articles by the same author(s)