A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY

Authors

  • John Neilson Curtin University of Technology
  • Greg Tower Curtin University of Technology

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative analysis of change in the accountability regime - from a fiduciary focus to a more relative and useful managerial accountability focus - across Australian local government. Six Australian states are reviewed revealing important differences between local government accountability across jurisdictions. Differences are evidenced in the demographic factors including financial capabilities, age and size of local governments. This study provides an important contribution to our understanding of public sector accountability in local government by documenting the increased emphasis in managerial decision making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alford, J.L.(1992) Performance monitoring in the public service. Working Paper No9. Graduate School of Management, University of Melbourne.

Australian Bureau of Statistics(ABS) (2005) Australian Demographic Statistics,March.

Baber,W.(1983) Towards understanding the role of auditing in the public sector.Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5 (3)pp 213-27.

Boyne,G.and Law,J.(1991) Accountability and local authority annual reports: The case of Welsh district councils.Financial Accountability and Management, 7(3)pp 179-94.

Cameron,W.C.(2004) Public accountability: Effectiveness, equity, ethics. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4)pp 59-67.

Carnegie,G.D.(2005) Promoting accountability in municipalities.Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (3)pp 78-87.

Davis, G., Wanna, J., Warhurst, J. and Weller, P. (1993) Public Policy in Australia (2ndEd). Allen & Unwin, North Sydney.

DOTARS (Department of Transport and Regional Services) (2003)Local Government Governance in Australia.

DOTARS (Department of Transport and Regional Services) (2004)Local Government Governance in Australia.

Giroux, G. (1989) Political interests and government accounting disclosure.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8 pp 199-217.

Giroux, G. and Shields, D. (1993) Accounting controls and bureaucratic strategy in municipal government.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 12 pp 239-62.

Ingram,R.W.(1984) Economic incentives and the choice of state government accounting practices.Journal of Accounting Research,22 (1)pp 126-44.

Mulgan,R,(2000) Comparing accountability in the public and private sectors.AustralianJournal of Public Administration, 59 (1)pp87-97.

Neilson,J.E.,Taylor,D.W.and Tower,G.T.(2006) The accountability focus of local government entities: A comparative study. Presentation to the European Accounting Association Annual Conference, Dublin, April.

Ogden,S.(1995) Transforming frameworks of accountability: The case of water privatisation.Accounting, Organisations and Society, 20 (2/3)pp 193-218.

Parker,L.and Gould,G.(1999) Changing public sector accountability: Critiquing new directions.Accounting Forum, 23 (2) pp109-35.

Patton,J.(1992) Accountability and government reporting.Financial Accountability and Management, 8 (3)pp 165-80.

Pommerehne, W. and Schneider, F. (1978) Fiscal illusion, political institutions and localpublic spending.Kyklos, 31 (3)pp 381-407.

Sinclair,A.(1995) The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting Organisations and Society,20 (2/3)pp 219-37.

Taylor,D.W.and Pincus, K.V.(1999) Core Concepts of Accounting Information. McGraw-Hill Companies, Sydney.

Taylor,D.W.and Rosair,M.(2000) The effects of participating parties, the public and size on governments departments'accountability disclosure in annual reports.Accounting Accountability and Performance, 6 (1)pp 77-98.

Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1979) The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses. The Accounting Review, 54 (2) pp 273-305.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-30

How to Cite

Neilson, J. . ., & Tower, G. . (2007). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 13(2), 1–15. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/28

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2007): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2007 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Most read articles by the same author(s)