UNDERSTANDING VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURES IN AUSTRALIA
Abstract
This study provides preliminary analysis of the extent and quality of financial ratio disclosures in the 2007 annual reports of Australian listed companies. The extent of financial ratio disclosures is captured through a 43 item template. In addition a unique 16 item matrix, evolved from the International Accounting Standards Board’s conceptual framework to measure the quality of financial ratio disclosures, is developed. The extent of financial ratios by Australian firms is a surprisingly low 9.2 percent. Shareholders return and return on equity ratios were reported by at least half of the companies yet 16 other ratios had zero communication. The quality of the financial ratios is rated somewhat better with reliability tenets best presented and comparability issues the worst. Resource firms tended to have the lowest quality of disclosure. Consistent with agency theory, statistical analysis shows that larger firms—those with a higher proportion of independent directors and entities that have a higher proportion of independent auditors—are likely to disclose financial ratio information more extensively. The findings of this research have important implications for understanding managerial disclosure incentives as they relate to the extent and quality of financial ratio disclosures in Australia. Economic drivers seem to better explain extent than the inherent quality of such communication.
References
Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB)(2004) Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements. Australian Accounting Standards Board. Retrieved:September 2007 from www.aasb.com.au
ASX Corporate Governance Council (2003) Principleof good governance and best practice recommendations. Australian Stock Exchange, Sydney.
Barako, D.G. (2004) Voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies: A longitudinal exploratory study.Unpublished paper. UWA, Perth.
Barako, D.G., Hancock, P. and Izan, H.Y. (2006) Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review,14 (2) pp107-25.
Bathala, C.T. and Rao, R.P. (1995) The determinants of board composition: An agency theory perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16 (1) pp 59-69.
Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R.E. (1990) The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15 (1) pp 72-87.
Beasley, M.S. (1996) An empirical analysis of the relationship between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71 (4) pp 443-65.
Beasley, M.S., Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R. and Lapides, P.D. (2000) Fraudulent financialreporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14 (4) pp 441-54.
Beretta, S. and Bozzolan, S. (2004) A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting, 39 (3) pp 265-88.
Bergevin, P.M. (2002) FinancialStatement Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Botosan, C.A. and Harris, M.S. (2000) Motivations for a change in disclosure frequency and its consequences: An examination of voluntary quarterly segment disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research,38 (2) pp329-53.
Buzby, S.L. (1975) Company size, listed versus unlisted stocks, and the extent of financial disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 13 (1) pp 16-37.
Chau,G.K. and Gray, S.J. (2002) Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37 (2) pp247-64.
Chen, C.J.P. and Jaggi, B. (2000) Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19 (4-5) pp 285-310.
Cheng, E.C.M. and Courtenay, S.M. (2006) Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal ofAccounting, 41 (3) pp 262-89.
Chow, C.W. and Wong-Boren, A. (1987) Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations. The Accounting Review, 62 (3) pp 533-41.
Craswell, A.T. and Taylor, S.L. (1992) Discretionary disclosure of reserves by oil and gas companies: An economic analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19 (2) pp 295-308.
Eng, L.L. and Mak, Y.T. (2003) Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22 (4) pp 325-45.
Fridson, M. and Alvarez, F. (2002) Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide.John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Gibson, C. (1982) Financial ratios in annual reports. The CPA Journal,52 (9) pp18-29.
Giordano-Spring, S. and Chauvey, J-N. (2007) Assessing the qualityof corporate social reporting through reporting principles: An empirical study of French listed companies on SBF 120 Stock Index. Presentation to the 27thEuropean Accounting Association Annual Congress, Lisbon, April.
Goodwin, J. and Seow, J.L. (2002) The influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the quality of financial reporting and auditing: Perceptions of auditors and directors in Singapore. Accounting and Finance, 42 (3) pp 195-223.
Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R. and Rajgopal, S. (2005) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 40 (1) pp 3-73.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis.Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T.E. (2002) Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian Corporations. Abacus, 38 (3) pp 317-49.
Healy, P.M. and Palepu, K.G. (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1-3) pp405-40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
