CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN SRI LANKA: THE IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT INFLUENCE, SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS AND THE 2004 TSUNAMI
Abstract
This study examines government influence, changes in societal expectations and the 2004 tsunami on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Sri Lanka, a developing country. Hypotheses are formulated based on legitimacy theory to examine the annual changes in total quantity and categories of CSR disclosures between 2004 and 2007. Four directional hypotheses are used to test the increase in CSR disclosures and the increase in category-specific CSR disclosures based on a disclosure classification system. A null hypothesis is used to test whether the change in CSR disclosures from 2004 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2006 remained relatively constant after 2006. The directional hypotheses and the null hypothesis on the extent of disclosure are supported but the category-specific hypotheses are rejected. This result provides support for legitimacy theory.
References
Adams, C. (2002) Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15 (2), 223-250.
Ariyabandu, M. and Hulangamuwa, P. (2002). Corporate social responsibility and natural disaster reduction in Sri Lanka. Retrieved: 20 August 2008 from <http://www.benfieldhrc.org/disaster_studies/csr/csr_sri_lanka.pdf>
Belkaoui, A. and Karpik, P. (1989) Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2(1), 36-51.
Christopher, T., Hutomo, S. and Monroe, G. (1997) Voluntary environmental disclosure by Australian listed mineral mining companies: An application of stakeholder theory. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 5 (1) pp 42-66.
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Deegan, C. (2009) Financial Accounting Theory (3rd Edition). McGraw-Hill Australia, Sydney.
Deegan, C. and Gordon, B. (1996) A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26 (3) pp 187-199.
Fernando, M. (2007) Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian tsunami: A comparative case study of two Sri Lankan companies. European Management Journal, 25 (1) pp 1-10.
Garcia-Sanchez, I. (2008) Corporate social reporting: Segmentation and characterization of Spanish companies. Corporate Social Reporting and Environmental Management, 15 (4) pp 187-198.
Gonzalez, M. and Leon, C. (2001) The adoption of environmental innovations in the hotel industry of Gran Canaria. Tourism Economics, 7 (2) pp 177-190.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice Hall Europe, Essex.
HLB Edirisinghe and Company. (2005) Doing business in Sri Lanka. Retrieved: 28 September 2008 from http://www.hlblk.com/doing_business_ in_colombo.html
Hackston, D. and Milne, M. (1996) Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9 (1) pp 77-108.
Henderson, J. (2007) Corporate social responsibility and tourism: Hotel companies in Phuket, Thailand, after the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Hospitality Management, 26, pp 228-239.
International Alert. (2005) Peace through profit: Sri Lankan perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Retrieved: 22 August 2008 from <http://www.international- alert.org/policy/business.htm>
Krippendorff, K. (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, California.
Marston, C. and Shrives, P. (1991) The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. The British Accounting Review, 23 (3) pp 195-210.
O’Donovan, G. (2002) Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (3) pp 344-371.
O’Rourke, D. (2004) Opportunities and obstacles for corporate social responsibility reporting in developing countries. Report prepared for World Bank-University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved: 10 January 2009 from <http://nature.berkeley.edu/orourke/PDF/CSR-Reporting.pdf>
Patten, D. (1991) Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10 (4) pp 297-308.
Perera, M. (1980) Accounting for State Industrial and Commercial Enterprises in a Developing Country: With Special Reference to Sri Lanka. ARNO press, New York.
Ratanajongkol, S., Davey, H., and Low, M. (2006) Corporate social reporting in Thailand. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 3 (1), pp 67-83.
Rodriguez, F. and Cruz, Y. (2007) Relation between social-environmental responsibility and performance in hotel firms. Hospitality Management, 26, pp 824-839.
Shukla, P. (2009) Correlation and Regression. Retrieved: 23 May 2009 from <http://staff.bus.brighton.ac.uk/ps8/marketing/research-methods/correlation-regression.pdf?f01cbf00>
Suchman, M. (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches Academy of Management Review, 20 (3) pp 571-610.
Trotman, K. and Bradley, G. (1981) Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting Organisations and Society, 6 (4) pp 355-362.
Wijesinghe, R. and Jayasinghe, R. (2005) Building a model nation. Lanka Monthly Digest – Cyber Edition, February. Retrieved: 12 December 2008 from http://www.lmd.lk/2005/February/articles.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
