THE EXTENT AND DETERMINANTS OF DISCLOSURE OF GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE GUIDELINES: AUSTRALIAN EVIDENCE

Authors

  • Theo Christopher Edith Cowan University
  • Mirela Filipovic Edith Cowan University

Abstract

This research paper examines the extent and determinants of disclosure of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) in a sample of Australian listed companies. The extent of disclosure was found to be extremely low and selective, differ across industries and couched in general terms. Positive Accounting Theory was used to formulate hypotheses to GRI disclosure in the 2004 annual report of 450 companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. It was hypothesised that GRI disclosure would be positively related to ownership, leverage, big four audit firms (BFAFs), size of the firm, profitability and industry type. A multivariate regression analysis was completed and the results supported a significant positive relation with ownership, leverage, size of the firm and industry type. The remaining two variables, BFAFs and profitability, were not found to be significantly related to GRI disclosure but supported a positive relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C.A. (2004) The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(5) pp 731-57.

Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage (2004) The State of Sustainability Reporting in Australia 2004. CAER, KPMG and Deni Greene Consulting Services, Canberra.

Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage (2005) The State of Sustainability Reporting in Australia 2005. CAER, KPMG and Deni Greene Consulting Services, Canberra.

Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) (2006) ASX Listing Rules Chapters. Retrieved: 20 January 2006 from www.asx.com.au/supervision/rules/listing/chapters.htm.

Ball, R., Kothari, S. and Robin, A. (2000) The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (1) pp 1-51.

Bazley, M., Brown, P. and Izan, H.Y. (1985) An analysis of lease disclosures byAustralian companies. Abacus, 21(1) pp 44-62.

Bradbury, M.E. (1992) Voluntary disclosure of financial segment data: New Zealand evidence. Accounting and Finance, 32(1) pp 15-26.

Choi, J.H. and Wong, T.J. (2002) Auditor choice and legal environment: An international investigation. Presentation to the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, Perth, July.

Christopher, T. and Hassan, S. (1996). Determinants of voluntary cash flow reporting: Australian evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 9(1) pp 40-7.

Cooke, T.E. (1989) An Empirical Study of Financial Disclosures by Swedish Companies. Garland Publishing, London.

Coy, D., Tower, G. and Dixon, K. (1991) Quantifying the quality of tertiary education annual reports. Accounting and Finance, 33(2) pp 121-9.

Craswell, A.T. and Taylor, S.L. (1992) Discretionary disclosure of reserves by oil and gas companies: An economic analysis. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 19 (2) pp 295-308.

Deegan, C. (2001) Financial Accounting Theory. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Sydney.

Deegan, C. (2006) Australian Financial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Irwin, Sydney.

De Vellis, R.F. (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Application. Sage Publications, Newbury, CA.

Frost, G., Jones, S., Loftus, J. and Laan, S.V.D. (2005) Sustainability Reporting: Practices, Performance and Potential. CPA Australia, Melbourne.

GlobalReporting Initiative (GRI) (2000) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental, and Social Performance. GRI, Boston, MA.

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2005) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Retrieved: 24 December 2005 from www.globalreporting.org.

Godfrey, J.M. and Jones, K.I. (1999) Political cost influence on income smoothing via extraordinary item classification. Accounting and Finance, 39 (3) pp229-54.

Gray, G., Farley, A. and Peirson, G. (1993) The voluntary disclosure of a value added statement.Presentation to the Annual Conference and Meeting of the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, Darwin, July.

Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J. (1996) Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1) pp 77-108.

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Finance and Economics, 3(4) pp 305-60.

Kelly,G.J. (1981) Australian social responsibilities disclosures: Some insights into contemporary measurement. Accounting and Business, 21 (2) pp 97-107.

Kolk, A. (2004) More than words? An analysis of sustainability reports. New Academy Review, 3(3) pp 59-75.

Kolk, A. (2005) Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or divergence? Management International Review, 45(Special Issue) pp 145-66.

KPMG (2002) KPMG International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002. De Meern and KPMG, Amsterdam.

KPMG (2005) KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005. University of Amsterdam and KPMG, Amsterdam.

Krippendorff, K. (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

Leftwich, R., Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1981) Voluntary corporate disclosure: The case of interim reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 19 pp50-77.

McKinnon, J.L. and Dalimunthe, L. (1993) Voluntary disclosure of segment information by Australian diversified companies. Accounting and Finance, 33(1) pp 33-50.

Maitland, A. (2002) Companies start to detail what on earth is going on: Global reporting imitative by Alison Maitland: Explaining environmental and social issues show commitment to sustainable business. Financial Times p 8.

Marston, C.L. and Shrives, P.J. (1991) The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. British Accounting Review, 23 (1) pp 195-210.

Morhardt, J.E., Baird, S. and Freeman, K. (2002) Scoring environmental and sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 9 pp215-33.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-30

How to Cite

Christopher, T. . ., & Filipovic, M. . . (2008). THE EXTENT AND DETERMINANTS OF DISCLOSURE OF GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE GUIDELINES: AUSTRALIAN EVIDENCE. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 14(2), 16–39. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/47

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2008): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2008 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.