THE IMPACT OF THE BEIJING OLYMPIC SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM ON ANNUAL REPORT SOCIAL DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL SPONSORS
Abstract
The aim of this study is to utilise legitimacy theory to explain the impact of the Beijing Olympic Sponsorship Program on annual report social disclosures including event-related disclosure of local sponsor companies for this legitimacy enhancing and maintaining positive event. The study is concerned with examining whether the arguments developed in relation to legitimacy repairing negative events explain corporate disclosure response to these legitimacy maintaining and enhancing positive events. The findings indicate that sponsors disclosed more social and event-related information but this was not the case for non-sponsors. It was also found that sponsors disclose more event-related information than non-sponsors but not in relation to overall disclosure. This result provides support for legitimacy theory for these legitimacy maintaining and enhancing positive events but is not entirely identical to the findings for legitimacy repairing associated with negative events.
Downloads
References
Bebbington, J., Larrinage, C. and Moneva, J. M. (2008a) Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3) pp 337-361.
Bebbington, J., Larrinage, C. and Moneva, J. M. (2008b) Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3) pp 371-374.
BOCOG. (2008) Overview of the Beijing Olympic Sponsorship Plan. Available at http://www.beijing2008.cn/bocog/sponsors/n214073540.shtml.
Deegan, C. (2002) The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3) pp 282-311.
Deegan, C. and Blomquist, C. (2006) Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian Minerals Industry. Accounting, Organisations and Society, (31) pp 343-372.
Deegan, C. and Gordon, B. (1996) A study of the environmental disclosure policies of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3) pp 187-199.
Deegan, C. and Rankin, M. (1996) Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(2) pp 52-69.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M. and Tobin, J. (2002) An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3) pp 312-343.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M. and Voght, P. (2000) Firms' disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1) pp 101-130.
Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975) Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1) pp 122-136.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995a) Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2) pp 47-77.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate and Social Reporting. Prentice Hall, London.
Guthrie, J., Cuganesan, S. and Ward, L. (2008) Industry specific social and environmental reporting: The Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum, 32 pp 1-15.
Islam, M. and Deegan, C. (2008) Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance: A study of two global clothing and sports retail companies. Paper presented at the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Krippendorff, K. (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage, London.
Kumar, R. (1996) Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners. Longman, Melbourne.
Lindblom, C. K. (1994) The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.
Mathews, M. (1993) Socially responsible accounting. Chapman Hall, London.
O'Donovan, G. (2002) Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3) pp 344-371.
Patten, D. (1992) Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 13(4) pp 397-411.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
