AN EVALUATION OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AND STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN SCIENCE SUBJECTS AT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL IN SINDH

Authors

  • Dr. Roshan Ali Teevno
  • Dr. Allah Dino Abro
  • Muhammad Akram

Keywords:

Language proficiency, science subjects, Students’ performance, perceptions of teachers and students

Abstract

The medium of instructions employed for teaching all science subjects up to secondary level is the indigenous language across all public schools of Sindh, but at higher secondary level the medium of instruction is English. Consequently, students face serious problems in learning science subjects. Realizing the gravity of this problem and its adverse effects on other subjects, an empirical study has been conducted which was aimed at measuring correlation between English language proficiency and students’ performance in science subjects. It involves students’ and teachers’ perceptions to find out whether English is truly an obstacle for students especially in science subjects or not, and if so, then to what extent it is so. The population of the study comprised all the teachers and students of Sindh, which was further delimited to Hyderabad, from which a sample of 500 students and 50 teachers was selected through random stratified sampling technique. The data was collected through survey method and questionnaire instruments. The findings showed that there was strong correlation between English language proficiency of students and their performance in science subjects. There was no significant difference between the perceptions of teachers and students regarding the impact of English proficiency on performance of students in science subjects. Even the performance of students in English and science subjects was alike. It also unfolded that the inadequate English language proficiency was such a gigantic stumbling block for students that demoralized a large number of students so much as to drop out prematurely in their studies. They, who managed to overcome this hindrance, get through the exams with merely passing marks or by re-sitting some supplementary exams. Result indicated that this problem was even graver for rural students compared to urban ones. It is suggested that time and energies allocated to improving students’ language proficiency ought to be improved both quantitatively and qualitatively and students should be given leverage to write down their answers partly in English and partly in native language.

References

Ahmed, A., Zarif, T., &Tehseen.A. (2013).The role of medium of instruction used in Pakistani classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(12), 609-615.

Aina J.K. Ogundele, A.G., Olanipekun, S. S. (2013). Students’ Proficiency in English Language relationship with Academic Performance in Science and Technical Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(9), 355 – 358. doi:10.12691/education-1-9-2 Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Pearson education Ltd.

Daller, M. H. & Phelan, D. (2013).Predicting international student study success.Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 173-193.doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0008

DeMarraiss, K. &Lapan, S. D. (2004). Foundations for research: Methods of enquiry in education and the social science (1st ed.). London: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Inc.

Woodrow, L. (2006). Academic success of international postgraduate education students and the role of English proficiency. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 1(1), 51-70.

Fink, A. (2003). The Survey Handbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publication, Inc. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412986328

Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world (1st ed.). New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.

Ibn-e-Khaldoon, I. (2001). Muqadmah Ibn-e-Khaldoon (Ed. 11), Karachi: Nafees Academy. Kaliyadan, F., Thalamkandathil, N., Parupalli, S. R., Amin, T. T., Balaha, M. H. & Ali, W.

H. A. B. (2015). English language proficiency and academic performance: A study of a medical preparatory year program in Saudi Arabia. Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 5(4): 140- 144. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.165126

Kiranmayi, N.C. & Celta, M. (2010). Code switching and code mixing in Arab students: Some implications. Language in India, 10(8), 156-167.

Li, G., Chen, W. &Duanmu J. (2010). Determinants of International Students' Academic Performance: A Comparison between Chinese and Other International Students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(4), 389-405. DOI: 10.1177/1028315309331490 Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). USA, Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Rahman, T. (2006).Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in Pakistan. In A. Saxena and L. Borin (eds). Trends in Linguistics: Lesser-known languages of South Asia: New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 73-94.

Ramsay, S., Barker, M., & Jones, E. (1999). Academic adjustment and learning processes: A comparison of international and local students in first-year University. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 129-144.

Selvadurai, R. (1998). Problems faced by international students in American colleges and universities. Community Review, 16(1), 153-158.

Shamim, F. (2011). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. In: H. Coleman, ed. 2001. Dreams and Realities: Developing Countries and the English Language. London: British Cou-ncil., pp. 291-311.

Wardlow, G. (1999). International students of Agriculture in U.S.A. institutions precursors to academic success. Journal of Agricultural Education, 30(1), 17-22.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Teevno, D. R. A. ., Abro, D. A. D. ., & Akram, M. . (2021). AN EVALUATION OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AND STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN SCIENCE SUBJECTS AT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL IN SINDH. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(6), 1279–1291. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2237

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 6 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.