IMPACT OF SOCIAL NETWORK FACEBOOK MARKETING PREDICTORS ON CUSTOMER PURCHASE INTENTION

Authors

  • Syed Imran Azhar Bokhari
  • Dr. Hajra Ihsan
  • Fouzia Jamshaid

Keywords:

Social Media, Social Media Marketing, Customer Purchase Intention, Performance Expectancy, Facebook.

Abstract

Social networking sites especially Facebook is being increasingly used by marketers to conduct online promotion activities. Despite being the most important online marketing tool these days, many companies is begun thinking about how utilizing social network. Facebook could help in appealing customer’s attention and to construct a profitable relationship with prospective people. Thus the objective of current research is to examine social network Facebook marketing predictors which help marketers to predict customer’s purchase intention. The current study proposed a conceptual framework and it tested with the cross-sectional data gathered from 300 students who used social network Facebook with the help of a questionnaire. The present study empirically confirmed that social network Facebook marketing predictors are significantly related to customers purchase intention. In the same way, interactivity and information content has a substantial impact on performance expectancy. Moreover, performance expectancy has been shown to have a significant impact on customer purchase intention. The results revealed that performance expectancy while partly mediating the relationships between interactivity and customer purchase intention. Findings of structural equation modeling supported the validity and reliability of current study model. The research results offer various implications on how marketers can effectively plan and implement their ads on social network Facebook.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdallah, A., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Algharabat, R. (2017). Telematics and Informatics Social media in marketing : A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telematics and Informatics, (May), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008.

Adamu, L., Hasmini, N., Ghani, A., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). The Internal Branding Practices and Employee Brand Citizenship Behavior : The Mediating Effect of Employee Brand fit. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(1), 99–106.

Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2004). The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. 3, 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2004.05.001.

Ali, F., Florida, S., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling ( PLS-SEM ) in hospitality research. 30(1), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568.

Arshad, S. (2019). Influence of Social Media Marketing On Consumer Behavior in Karachi. 9(2), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.02.2019.p8670.

Barreda, A. A., Bilgihan, A., Nusair, K., & Okumus, F. (2016). Online branding: Development of hotel branding through interactivity theory. Tourism Management, 57, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.007.

Can, L., & Kaya, N. (2016). Social networking sites addiction and the effect of attitude towards social network advertising. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.059.

Chang, Y., Yu, H., & Lu, H. (2015). Persuasive messages , popularity cohesion , and message diffusion in social media marketing. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.027.

Cho, C. H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 21(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1999.10505087.

Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003.

Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646.

Duffett, R. G. (2015a). Facebook advertising’s influence on intention-to-purchase and purchase amongst millennials.

In Internet Research (Vol. 25). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2014-0020.

Duffett, R. G. (2015b). Facebook advertising ’ s influence on intention-to-purchase and purchase amongst Millennials. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2014-0020.

Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3 SPEC. ISS.), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00106-1.

Goodrich, K. (2011). Anarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes.

Psychology and Marketing, 28(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20371.

Grant, C. (2014). THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK IN DISSERTATION RESEARCH : 12–26.

https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9.

Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., Yee, A., Chong, L., Hair, J., … Chong, L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research, https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04- 2016-0130

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance- based structural equation modeling. 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

Jiang, Z., & Chan, J. (2010). Journal of the Association for Information Effects of Interactivity on Website Involvement and Purchase Intention * Effects of Interactivity on Website Involvement and Purchase Intention. 11(1), 34–59.

Kim, H., & Niehm, L. S. (2009). The Impact of Website Quality on Information Quality , Value , and Loyalty Intentions in Apparel Retailing. INTMAR, 23(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.009.

Kohli, C., Suri, R., & Kapoor, A. (2014). Will social media kill branding ? Business Horizons, (October 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.08.004.

Larcker’s, F. and. (2016). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. 18(1), 39–50.

Lee, H. H., Fiore, A. M., & Kim, J. (2006). The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 34(8), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550610675949.

Lee, J., & Hong, I. B. (2016). International Journal of Information Management Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising : The roles of emotional appeal , informativeness , and creativity. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.01.001.

Lin, C. A., & Kim, T. (2016). Predicting user response to sponsored advertising on social media via the technology acceptance model Computers in Human Behavior Predicting user response to sponsored advertising on social media via the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(October 2017), 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.027.

Liu-thompkins, Y. (2002). What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing ? Implications of Definition , Person , and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing ? Implications of de .. (November 2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685.

Logan, K., Bright, L. F., Gangadharbatla, H., Logan, K., & Bright, L. F. (2012). among females Facebook versus television : advertising value perceptions among females, https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931211274651.

Media, N., & Kiousis, S. (2015). New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402320564392.

Men, L. R., & Tsai, W. S. (2015). public engagement , and relational outcomes. Public Relations Review, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.02.005.

Muntinga, D., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Exploring motivations for brand-related. (July 2015). https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-013-046.

Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12147.

Prof, A., & Tuna, S. (2015). Approaches on New Media : Proceedings of 1st International ( May 21 , 2015 , Istanbul

, Turkey ) Yeni Medyada Yaklaşımlar : 1 . Uluslararası Yeni Medya İstanbul , Türkiye ) Editors .

Pütter, M. (2017). The Impact of Social Media on Consumer Buying Intention. 3(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.31.3001.

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). Citizens ’ adoption of an electronic government system : towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y.

Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Islam, R. (2019a). Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46(September 2017), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.001.

Steuer, J. (n.d.). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. 1–25.

Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., & Strutton, D. (2011). Friends , Fans , and Followers : Do Ads Work on Social

Networks ? How Gender and Age Shape Receptivity. (March), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-1- 258-275.

Venkatesh, V. (2012). C ONSUMER A CCEPTANCE AND U SE OF I NFORMATION T ECHNOLOGY : E XTENDING THE U NIFIED T HEORY. 36(1), 157–178.

Voorveld, H. A. M., Van Noort, G., & Duijn, M. (2013). Building brands with interactivity: The role of prior brand usage in the relation between perceived website interactivity and brand responses. Journal of Brand Management, 20(7), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.3.

Wright, R. T. (n.d.). SHUT-UP I DON ’ T CARE : UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF RELEVANCE AND INTERACTIVITY ON CUSTOMER ATTITUDES TOWARD REPETITIVE ONLINE ADVERTISING. 62–76.

Zeng, B., & Gerritsen, R. (2014). What do we know about social media in tourism ? A review. TMP, 10, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2014.01.001.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

Bokhari, S. I. A. ., Ihsan, D. H. ., & Jamshaid, F. . (2021). IMPACT OF SOCIAL NETWORK FACEBOOK MARKETING PREDICTORS ON CUSTOMER PURCHASE INTENTION. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(5), 2238–2252. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2081

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 5 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.