THE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF THE OIL AND GAS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Rizwan Ahmad AFFILIATION INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER

Keywords:

Judicial review, Executive Overreach, Constitutional jurisdiction, Regulatory compliance.

Abstract

This research paper critically examines the role of judicial review in preventing executive overreach in Pakistan, with a particular focus on the constitutional jurisdiction exercised by courts under Article 199. It highlights the judiciary's role in reinforcing regulatory compliance, ensuring procedural fairness, and protecting economic rights against arbitrary administrative actions. By analyzing key judicial precedents, including recent rulings by the Courts, this paper illustrates how courts have maintained the supremacy of law in regulatory matters, particularly within the petroleum sector governed by the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002. Additionally, the paper explores how judicial intervention serves as a safeguard against the misuse of administrative authority, compelling regulatory bodies such as OGRA to function within their legally defined scope. A comparative analysis of judicial review frameworks in the UK and USA provides further insight into how courts in different jurisdictions balance executive discretion with constitutional oversight. The research concludes that judicial vigilance remains crucial for upholding constitutionalism, regulatory transparency, and economic freedoms in Pakistan, reinforcing the principle that no administrative authority is above the law. This research paper critically examines the role of constitutional jurisdiction in preventing executive overreach in Pakistan, focusing on the regulatory framework governing petroleum businesses. It explores the significance of judicial review in administrative actions, emphasizing the limitations imposed by the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, and the Pakistan Oil (Refining, Blending, Transportation, Storage, and Marketing) Rules, 2016. The paper delves into the broader implications of constitutional jurisdiction on regulatory governance, the protection of economic rights, and the role of the judiciary in ensuring fair and lawful administrative practices. By analyzing judicial precedents, statutory frameworks, and governance principles, this paper highlights the importance of lawful authority in executive decision-making and its impact on the business environment in Pakistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. (2020). 'Judicial Oversight and Regulatory Frameworks in Pakistan', Karachi Law Review.

Cheema, U. & Gilani, R. (2021). 'The Constitutional Role of Judiciary in Pakistan: Balancing Executive Power',

Pakistan Journal of Law and Society.

Bell, J. (2011) Comparative administrative law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hussain, A. (2019). 'Judicial Activism and Economic Development in Pakistan', Lahore Legal Studies.

Jamil, F. (2017). 'Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Role of Judiciary', Islamabad Journal of Legal Studies.

Khan, T. (2019). 'Separation of Powers and Judicial Intervention in Pakistan', South Asian Legal Review.

Malik, N. (2022). 'Administrative Law and Regulatory Governance in Pakistan', Journal of Policy and Governance.

McCrudden, C. (2006) ‘Legal research and the social sciences’, Law Quarterly Review, 122, pp. 632-650.

Nasir, M. (2022). 'Judicial Review and the Rule of Law in Pakistan', Punjab Law Review.

Rahman, K. (2021). 'Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Governance in South Asia', Asian Law Journal.

Saeed, H. (2020). 'Judiciary and Regulatory Compliance in Pakistan', Business and Law Journal.

Smith, J. (2018). 'Judicial Review in the United Kingdom and its Lessons for Developing Democracies', International

Law Review.

Siems, M. (2018) ‘Legal originality’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(1), pp. 239-260.

Zafar, R. (2020). 'Legal Remedies for Businesses Facing Regulatory Overreach', Pakistan Business Law Journal

Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (1985) AC 374 (HL). Available at:

https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1984/9.html (Accessed: 15 February 2025).

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (USA).

Export Promotion Bureau v. Qaiser Shafiullah (1994) SCMR 859. Available at: https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/

(Accessed: 20 February 2025).

Dilawar Jan v. Gul Rehman (2001) PLD SC 149. Available at: https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/ (Accessed: 12 March

.

Government of Punjab v. Crescent Textile Mills Limited (2004) PLD SC 108. Available at:

https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/ (Accessed: 5 March 2025).

Muhammad Safeer v. Muhammad Azam (2024) PLD SC 838. Available at: https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/

(Accessed: 27 February 2025).

Nasreen Fatima v. Principal, Bolan Medical College (1978) PLD Quetta 17. Available at:

https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/ (Accessed: 10 March 2025).

Saeeda Fatima v. Abdul Hamid (1983) PLD SC 258. Available at: https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/ (Accessed: 25

February 2025).

Government of Pakistan (2012). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (Eighth Edition). Article 18.

Retrieved from: https://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1549886415_632.pdf (Accessed: 10 February 2025).

Government of Pakistan (2002). Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002. Retrieved from:

http://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1345401745_461.pdf (Accessed: 18 March 2025).

Government of Pakistan (2016). Pakistan Oil (Refining, Blending, Transportation, Storage, and Marketing) Rules,

Retrieved from: http://www.pakistanlawsite.com (Accessed: 2 March 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-06-09

How to Cite

Ahmad, R. . (2025). THE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF THE OIL AND GAS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 31(2), 36–43. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2863