THE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN: A CASE STUDY OF THE OIL AND GAS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cibg.v31i2.2863Keywords:
Judicial review, Executive Overreach, Constitutional jurisdiction, Regulatory compliance.Abstract
This research paper critically examines the role of judicial review in preventing executive overreach in Pakistan, with a particular focus on the constitutional jurisdiction exercised by courts under Article 199. It highlights the judiciary's role in reinforcing regulatory compliance, ensuring procedural fairness, and protecting economic rights against arbitrary administrative actions. By analyzing key judicial precedents, including recent rulings by the Courts, this paper illustrates how courts have maintained the supremacy of law in regulatory matters, particularly within the petroleum sector governed by the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002. Additionally, the paper explores how judicial intervention serves as a safeguard against the misuse of administrative authority, compelling regulatory bodies such as OGRA to function within their legally defined scope. A comparative analysis of judicial review frameworks in the UK and USA provides further insight into how courts in different jurisdictions balance executive discretion with constitutional oversight. The research concludes that judicial vigilance remains crucial for upholding constitutionalism, regulatory transparency, and economic freedoms in Pakistan, reinforcing the principle that no administrative authority is above the law. This research paper critically examines the role of constitutional jurisdiction in preventing executive overreach in Pakistan, focusing on the regulatory framework governing petroleum businesses. It explores the significance of judicial review in administrative actions, emphasizing the limitations imposed by the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, and the Pakistan Oil (Refining, Blending, Transportation, Storage, and Marketing) Rules, 2016. The paper delves into the broader implications of constitutional jurisdiction on regulatory governance, the protection of economic rights, and the role of the judiciary in ensuring fair and lawful administrative practices. By analyzing judicial precedents, statutory frameworks, and governance principles, this paper highlights the importance of lawful authority in executive decision-making and its impact on the business environment in Pakistan.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. (2020). 'Judicial Oversight and Regulatory Frameworks in Pakistan', Karachi Law Review.
Cheema, U. & Gilani, R. (2021). 'The Constitutional Role of Judiciary in Pakistan: Balancing Executive Power', Pakistan Journal of Law and Society.
Bell, J. (2011) Comparative administrative law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hussain, A. (2019). 'Judicial Activism and Economic Development in Pakistan', Lahore Legal Studies.
Jamil, F. (2017). 'Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Role of Judiciary', Islamabad Journal of Legal Studies.
Khan, T. (2019). 'Separation of Powers and Judicial Intervention in Pakistan', South Asian Legal Review.
Malik, N. (2022). 'Administrative Law and Regulatory Governance in Pakistan', Journal of Policy and Governance.
McCrudden, C. (2006) ‘Legal research and the social sciences’, Law Quarterly Review, 122, pp. 632-650.
Nasir, M. (2022). 'Judicial Review and the Rule of Law in Pakistan', Punjab Law Review.
Rahman, K. (2021). 'Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Governance in South Asia', Asian Law Journal.
Saeed, H. (2020). 'Judiciary and Regulatory Compliance in Pakistan', Business and Law Journal.
Smith, J. (2018). 'Judicial Review in the United Kingdom and its Lessons for Developing Democracies', International Law Review.
Siems, M. (2018) ‘Legal originality’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(1), pp. 239-260.
Zafar, R. (2020). 'Legal Remedies for Businesses Facing Regulatory Overreach', Pakistan Business Law Journal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizwan AhmadYou are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.