LEADERSHIP IN LIQUID MODERNITY
Abstract
This paper explores possibilities for refreshing thinking about leadership from perspectives of liquid modernity suggested by Bauman (2000), who identified several dimensions of modern uncertainty in human life and work. Reflecting unease with post-modernism, Bauman’s work has been influential in contemporary understandings of society, culture, learning and identity. It is also being taken up in emerging explorations of liquid learning in the educational literature. However, its implications for leadership remain largely unexplored in the management literature. This paper considers how current conceptions of leadership that emphasise the power of individual agency might be usefully re-considered in the light of Bauman’s contribution and it develops a number of generative questions to help that process. It then turns to conceptions of liquid learning to suggest some navigational aids for leading under conditions of liquidity.
Downloads
References
Barnett, R. (2012) Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 31, 1, pp 65-77.
Bass, B. (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 3, pp 19–31.
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bauman, Z. (2002) Society under siege. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bauman, Z. (2003) Liquid love. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bauman, Z. (2006) Education in liquid modernity. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 27, 4, pp 303–317.
Bauman, Z. (2007) Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bauman, Z. and Tester, K. (2001) Conversations with Zymunt Bauman. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Beck, U. and Lau, C. (2003) The theory of reflective modernisation: Problems, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture and Society, 20, 2, pp 1–33.
Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2009) Distributed leadership in Higher Education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 2, pp 257–277.
Bryant, A. (2007) Liquid modernity, complexity and turbulence. Theory and Society, 24, 1, pp 127–135.
Clawson, J (2012) Level Three Leadership: getting below the surface (5th Edition). Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Davis, M. (2011) Bauman’s compass: Navigating the current interregnum. Acta Sociologica, 54, pp 183–194.
Eisenstadt, S. (2000) Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129, 1, pp 1–29.
Engestrom, Y. (2004) The new generation of expertise: Seven theses. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller and A. Munro (eds.) Workplace learning in context. Routledge, London. pp.145–165.
Feng Jing, F. and Avery, G. (2008) Missing links in understanding the relationship between leadership and organizational performance. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7, 5, pp 67–78.
Garrick, J. and Usher, R. (2000) ‘Flexible learning, contemporary work and enterprising selves’, Electronic Journal of Sociology. Available at http://www.sociology.org/content/vol005.001/garrick-usher.html
Giddens, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Gronn, P. and Ribbins, P, (1996) Leaders in context: Postpositivist approaches to understanding educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, Aug., 32, pp 452–473.
Heifetz, R. (1994) Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lee, A. (2010) ‘What counts as educational research? Spaces, boundaries and alliances‘, The Australian Educational Researcher, 37, 4, pp. 63–78.
Lee, R. (2005) Bauman, liquid modernity and dilemmas of development Thesis Eleven, 83, pp 61–77.
Lee, R. (2011) Modernity, solidity and agency: Liquidity revisited. Sociology, 45, 4, pp 650–664.
McCormack, R., Pancini, G. and Tout, D. (2011) Learningful work: learning to work and learning to learn. International Journal of Training Research, 8, 1, pp 40–52.
Poikela, E. and Poikela, S. (2005) The strategic points of problem based learning. In E. Poikela & S. Poikela (eds.) PBL in Context – Bridging Work and Education. Tampere University Press, Tampere. pp. 7 – 22.
Pollock, G. (2007) Liquid modernity and cultural analysis: An introduction to a transdisciplinary encounter. Theory, Culture & Society, 24, 1, pp 111–116.
Pureau, B (2012) The implications of e-government and communication strategy in Australian Local Government organisations: An investigation of current and emerging practice. DBA Thesis. Faculty of Business and Enterprise, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn.
Rittel. H and Webber, M 1973, Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, pp 155-169.
Savin-Baden, M. (2007) Second Life PBL: Liminality, Liquidity and Lurking Keynote, Reinventing Problem-based Learning Conference, Republic Polytechnic, Singapore, 7-9th March,. Available at http://cuba.coventry.ac.uk/maggisb/files/2010/05/keynote.pdf
Shearing, C. and Marks, M. (2011) Being a new police in the liquid 21st century. Policing, 5, 3, pp 210-218.
Starrat, R. (2001) Democratic leadership theory in late modernity: an oxymoron or ironic possibility? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 4, pp 333–352.
Vaccaro, I. (2010) Theorizing Impending Peripheries: Postindustrial landscapes at the edge of hyper-modernity’s collapse. Journal of International and Global Studies, 1, 2, pp 22–44.
Waldman, D., Bass, B. and Yammarino, F. (1990) ‘Adding to Contingent-Reward Behavior’, Group and Organization Studies, 15, 4, pp. 381–394.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
