LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: PRESENT AND FUTURE
Abstract
Universities and colleges are expected not only to create knowledge, improve equity, and respond to student needs, but to do so more efficiently and effectively. Hence, to capture the advantage of this more central focus and role, institutions of higher education need to transform their structures, missions, leadership, and processes and programs in order to be more flexible and more responsive to changing social needs. Pivotal to institutional success in achieving this transformation is effective leadership, a critical factor in sustaining and improving universities’ quality and performance. This paper, therefore, examines whether the leaders of higher education are indeed taking the path to success and whether, in doing so, they are implementing a transformational or transactional leadership style. Specifically, this paper aims to systematically review the key findings in the existing literature investigating the styles of and approaches to leadership behaviors that are associated with effectiveness in higher education. The discussion includes a synthesis of the theoretical literature on leadership in higher education and concludes with an overview of potential strategies for educational leaders.
Downloads
References
Ambrose, S., Huston, T. and Norman, M. (2005). A qualitative method for assessing faculty satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46, pp. 803-830.
Astin, AW. and Astin, H.S. (2000). Leadership Reconsidered: Engaging Higher Education in Social Change. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Basham, L.M. (2010). Transformational and transactional leaders in higher education. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(6), pp. 141-152.
Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York,NY: Free Press.
Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17, pp. 11-112.
Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1995). Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Rater form (5x short). Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Bass, B.M., Jung, D.I., Avolio, B.J. and Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp. 207-218.
Benoit, P. and Graham, S. (2005). Leadership excellence: Constructing the role of department chair. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal. 3(1), http://www.academicleadership.org/volume3/issue1/articles/5/5_full.html
Bijandi, M.S., Nazari, K., Pourrajab, M., and Mahdinezhad, M. (2011). Role of a dynamic educational leader on teaching and learning in higher education. International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development IPEDR, 10, pp. 336-341.
Bland, C.J., Center, B.A., Finstad, K.R.R. and Staples, J.G. (2005a). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and departmental research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80, pp. 225- 237.
Bland, C.J., Weber-Main, A.M., Lund, S.M. and Finstad, D.A. (2005b). The Research-Productive Department: Strategies from Departments that Excel. Boston, MA: Anker.
Bono, J.E. and Judge, T.A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding motivational effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 46, pp. 554-571.
Boyett, I. (1996). New leader, new culture, “Old” university. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17, pp. 24-30.
Brown, F.W. and Moshavi, D. (2002). Herding academic cats: Faculty reactions to transformational and contingent leadership by department chairs. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(3), pp. 79-93.
Burns, J.M. (1978) Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
Caldwell, B.J. and Spinks, J.M. (1999). Beyond the Self-Managing School Student Outcomes and the Reform of Education Series. London: Falmer Press.
Cameron, K.S. and Tschirhart, M. (1992). Postindustrial environments and organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 63, pp. 87-108.
Carlson, D.S. and Perrewe, P.L. (1995). Institutionalization of organizational ethics through transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), pp. 829-839.
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., and Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35, pp. 699-726.
Chenoweth, T.G. and Everhart, R.B. (2002). Navigating Comprehensive School Change: A Guide for the Perplexed. Eye On Education, Inc.
Colbert, A.E., Kristof-Brown, A.L., Bradley, B.H., and Barrick, M.R. (2008). CEO transformational leadership: The role of global importance congruence in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 51, pp. 81-96.
Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1987). Towards a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, pp 637-647.
Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, pp. 439-452.
Connor, L.J. (2004). Moving from transactional to transformational leadership in academic programs of colleges of agriculture. NACTA Journal, 48(2), pp. 52-56.
Dimmock, C. (1996). Dilemmas for school leaders and administrators in restructuring. International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, pp. 135-170.
Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(4), pp. 338-356.
Dollak, A. (2008). Transactional leadership vs. transformational leadership. (Online). Available http://www.associatedcontent.com.
Earley, P. and Weindling, D. (2004). Understanding School Leadership. Sage Publications Ltd.
Eckel, P.D. and Kezar, A. (2003a). Key strategies for making new institutional sense: Ingredients to higher education transformation. Higher Education Policy, 16, pp .39-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.