LESSONS FROM THE STREET: LEADING COMPLEX WORK AT THE FRONT LINE
Abstract
Emerging academic commentary asks how people can be prepared for work and leadership under conditions of increasing complexity. It has been noted, however, that treatments of leadership in the management literature have been slow to engage with complexity thinking and also remain largely focused on executive and middle level leadership. This paper explores the implications of complexity thinking for front-line leadership work. It does that, firstly, by considering leadership questions implied by newer theoretical perspectives on complex practice and secondly, by revisiting earlier insights into complex work at street level. Lipsky’s (1980) exploration of street-level bureaucracy suggested that unresolvable paradoxes in public policy have always created significant dilemmas for front-line practitioners and leaders. Policing, education and welfare are prime examples of this space. Indeed, Perez (2011) suggests that operational police and their leaders face uniquely complex dilemmas. Thirdly, then, this paper references research undertaken with 50 serving police officers in Melbourne to focus on key issues for contemporary front-line leadership.
Downloads
References
Barnett, R. (2012) Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23 (3) pp 247-260.
Bowden, J. and Marton, F. (1998) The University of Learning: Beyond Quality and Competence in Higher Education. Kogan Page, London.
Briggs, L. (2007) Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective. Public Service Commission, Canberra. Available at http:/www.apsc.gov.au/publications07/wickedproblems.htm
Brown, J., Collins, A. and Duguid, S. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1) pp 132–42.
Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Boston.
Cherry, N. (2010) Doing qualitative research in the white spaces. In J.Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin and R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching Practice. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam. 87-94.
De Church, l., Hiller, N., Murase, T., Doty, D. and Salas, E. (2010) Leadership across levels: levels of leaders and their levels of impact. Leadership Quarterly, 21 (6) pp 1069-1085.
Doren, D. and Smith, D. (1999) Scenario planning: a new approach to teaching marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing Education, 21 (2) pp 146-155.
Goldstein, H. (2003) On further developing problem-oriented policing: the most critical need, the major impediments, and a proposal. Crime Prevention Studies: Volume 15. Criminal Justice Press, New York, pp 13–47.
Geiger, D. and Antonacopoulou, E. (2009) Narrative sand organisational dynamics: exploring blind spots and organisational inertia. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 45 (3) pp 411–554.
Higgs, J. and Titchen, A. (2001) Preface. In J. Higgs and A. Titchen (Eds.), Professional Practice in Health, Education and the Creative Art. Blackwell Science, Oxford. x-xii.
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Lipsky, M. (2010) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Celebration Reissue, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Loftus, B. (2012) Police Culture in a Changing World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Macvean, A. and Cox, C. (2012) Police education in a university setting: emerging cultures and attitudes. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 6 (1) pp 16-25.
Marenin, O. (1982) Parking tickets and class repression: the concept of policing in critical theories of criminal justice. Contemporary Crises, 6 (3) pp 241–266.
Perez, D. (1997) Paradoxes of Police Work: Walking the Thin Blue Line. Copperhouse Publishing Company, Incline Village, Nevada.
Perez, D. (2011) Paradoxes of Police Work. 2nd Ed. Delmar, New York.
Perkins, D. (1999) ‘The many faces of constructivism’. Educational Leadership, 57 (3) pp6-11.
Polzer, J., Gulati, R., Khurana, R. and Tushman, M. (2009) Crossing boundaries to increase relevance in organizational research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(4) pp 280–286
Rittel, H. and Webber, M., (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, pp 155-169.
Rowley, J. and Gibbs, P. (2008) From learning organisation to practically wise organisation. The Learning Organisation, 15 (3) pp 356-372.
Schön, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Shearing, C. and Marks, M. (2011) Being a new police in the liquid 21st century. Policing, 5 (3) pp 210–218.
Stacey, R. (1992) Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos in Organisations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Van Knippenberg, D. and Sitkin, S. (2013) A critical assessment of charismatic–transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7 (1) pp 1–60.
Weick K. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd edn. Random House, New York.
Weick, K. (1993) The collapse of sense-making in organisations: the Mann-Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (4) pp 628–652.
Weick, K. (2011) Organised sense-making: a commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations, 65 (1) pp 141–153.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
