THE CHALLENGES OF POLYPHONY: A PERSPECTIVE ON NEW ZEALAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Authors

  • Jonathan Barrett Open Polytechnic

Abstract

In modern democracies, just governance is dependent on decision-makers hearing plural citizens’ voices. Recognition of multiple, conflicting, yet equally valid voices may be described as polyphony. New Zealand’s Local Government Act 2002 mandates participation by local residents in the decision-making processes of their councils. Drawing on research into two councils, which manifest distinctly different approaches to citizen participation, this article looks at the challenges for local government engagement with polyphony. First the position of speakers is considered, with focus on the conditions for and barriers to speech in a local community context. Second, consideration is given to the position of intermediaries, those who filter, amplify or otherwise modify others’ voices. Third, the position of decision-making hearers is considered. Finally, an outline is given of how two particular councils engage with the issues raised by polyphony.

References

Benkler, Y. (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Bird, F. (1996) The Muted Conscience: Moral Silence and the Practice of Ethics in Business. Quorum Books, Westport, CT.

Chilton, S. and Cuzzo, M. (2005) Habermas's theory of communicative action as a theoretical framework for mediation practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22 (3) pp 325-348.

Craig, P. (2003) Administrative Law. Sweet and Maxwell, London.

Dal Pont, G. (2008) Law of Agency (2nd Edition). LexisNexis Butterworths, Chatswood.

Dicey, A. (1915) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Macmillan, London.

Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D. (1991) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Frey, B. (1996) A directly democratic and federal Europe. Constitutional Political Economy, 7 (4) pp 267-279.

Habermas, J. (1986) Law and morality. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 8 pp 217-277.

Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Hornblower, S. (1993) Creation and development of democratic institutions in ancient Greece. In J. Dunn (ed.) Democracy: The Unfinished Journey 508BC to 1993. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford. 1-16.

Joseph, P. (2007) Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand (3rd Edition). Brookers, Wellington.

Mouffe, C. (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66 pp 745-758.

Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. Routledge, London.

New Zealand Parliament. (1990). New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Government Printer, Wellington.

New Zealand Parliament. (1993). Electoral Act 1993. Government Printer, Wellington.

New Zealand Parliament. (2002). Local Government Act 2002. Government Printer, Wellington.

Parsons, T. (1947) Notes on Gemeinschaft and Geselleschaft. In M. Weber. Theory of Social and Economic Organization. William Hodge, London. 686-694.

Power, M. and Laughlin, R. (1996) Habermas, law and accounting. Accounting Organizations and Society, 21 (5) pp 441-65.

Rehg, W. (1996) Translator's introduction. In J. Habermas. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. ix-xxxvii.

Torfling, J. (1999) New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Blackwell, Oxford.

Van Dun, F. (1986) Economics and the limits of value-free science. Reason Papers, 11 pp 17-32.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-30

How to Cite

Barrett, J. . (2011). THE CHALLENGES OF POLYPHONY: A PERSPECTIVE ON NEW ZEALAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 17(2), 32–43. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/86

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2011): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2011 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.