The Constitutionality Of Open Legal Policy On The Guarantee Of Citizens Rights In Judicial Review

Authors

  • Rudatyo
  • Sunny Ummul Firdaus
  • Ri’dhollah Purwa Jati

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the constitutionality of the open legal policy on the guarantee of citizens' rights in a judicial review. The results showed that an open legal policy can be interpreted as a freedom for legislators to form legal policies (laws). There were at least 15 Constitutional Court Decisions that did not grant the petition on the basis of open legal policy considerations from 2005 to 2015. However, until the time the conception related to open legal policy in the Constitutional Court Decision did not have clear boundaries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Ahsin Thohari. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengokohan Demokrasi Konstitusional Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 6, no. 3 (2009).

Arizona, Y. “Perkembangan Konstitusionalitas Penguasaan Negara Atas Sumber Daya Alam Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 3 (2011): 257– 314.

Bradley C. Canon. “Defining the Dimension of Judicial Activism.” Judicature 66, no. 6 (1983).

Gardha Galang Mantara Sukma. “Open Legal Policy Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Bidang Politik Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Terhadap Putusan MK Bidang Politik Tahun 2015-2017).” Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (2020).

Handayani, I.G.A.K. Rachmi, Lego Karjoko, and Abdul Kadir Jaelani. “Model Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Eksekutabilitas Dalam Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Bestuur 7, no. 1 (2019): 36–46. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bestuur/article/view/42700.

Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar. “Questioning the Independence of Media Coverage in the 2019 Elections.” Jurnal Bestuur 8, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.42725.

Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, and Lego Karjoko. “EXECUTABILITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING GRACE PERIOD IN THE FORMULATION OF LEGISLATION.” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 28, no. 15 (2019): 816–23.

Lutfil Ansori. “Telaah Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019.”

Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 1 (2017): 19.

Martilah. “Progresifitas Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Membuat Putusan: Analisis Terhadap Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Positive Legislature.” Jurnal Konstitusi 41, no. 2 (2012): 322.

Maruar Siahaan. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Mauro Cappelletti. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Muhammad Addi Fauzani, Fandi Nur Rohman. “Urgensi Rekonstruksi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memberikan Pertimbangan Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy).” Justitia Et Pax 35, no. 2 (2019).

Radita Ajie. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Inconesia 13, no. 02 (2016).

Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 559–84.

T. Taufiqulhadi. “Relasi DPR, Partai Politik Dan Konstituen.” Jurnal Transformative 1, no. 1 (2015): 3.

Yusriando. “Konstruksi Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional Bidang Kesehatan Yusriando.”

Bestuur 7, no. 2 (2019).

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Rudatyo, Firdaus, S. U. ., & Jati, R. P. . (2021). The Constitutionality Of Open Legal Policy On The Guarantee Of Citizens Rights In Judicial Review. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 4018–4027. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/840

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.