A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF RURAL COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP: TOWARDS SYSTEMATISED UNDERSTANDING AND DIALOGUE ACROSS LEADERSHIP DOMAINS
Abstract
Key texts in leadership research outline the attributes and practices of the effective leader, consistently emphasising relationship-building, trust, reciprocity, Emotional Intelligence and effectiveness of leadership styles. In rural community development research, there are descriptions of local leaders engendering and sustaining the confidence, resilience and capacity of ‘their’ communities. Such leaders are seen as "champions" working with a cohort of "usual suspects". These arrangements are particularly accentuated and fragile in remoter settlements. With limited exceptions, understanding tends to be largely case-study based. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to bring together for the first time the "macro" depictions and recommendations for sound leaders and leadership (from key texts) alongside the "micro"-level findings of rural community leadership literature, to review the extent to which the two sets of thinking and evidence resonate and reinforce one another. My analysis shows that: social embeddedness is consistently identified across both literatures, with extra-local links being a focus of the rural literature; Emotional Intelligence and leadership styles are investigated in the leadership literature, but only in one instance in the rural literature; and individual and collective agency and leadership are identified in both literatures. I conclude by identifying the implications of this critical analysis for leadership investment and training: tailored to complexity and embeddedness whilst also operationalising those transferable components of effective individual and group leadership observable in the literature. My findings contribute to understandings that move beyond the "mystique" of rural community leadership towards analyses that are: more systematic; based on an increasing evidence-base across domains; and likely to lead to more robust outcomes in and for remote and rural communities.
References
Alston, M. (2005) Gender perspectives in Australian rural community life. InC. Cocklin and J. Dibden (eds) (2005)Sustainability and Change in Rural Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney. 139-156.
Argent, N. (2008) Perceived density, social interaction and morale in New South Wales rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 24 pp 245–261.
Bass, B.M. (1985)Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press, New York.
Bass, B.M. and Riggio, R.E. (2006) Transformational Leadership (2nd Edition). Psychology Press, Hove.
Boyatzis, R. (1999) Self-directed change and learning as a necessary meta-competency for success and effectiveness in the 21st century. In R. Sims and J. Veres (eds)Keys to Employee Success in the Coming Decades. Greenwood Publishing, Westport, CN. Cited in Goleman(2004), p 110.
Brennan, M. and Luloff, A. (2007) Exploring rural community agency differences in Ireland and Pennsylvania. Journal of Rural Studies, 23 pp 52-61.
Brunori, G. and Rossi, A. (2007) Differentiating countryside: Social representations and governance patterns in rural areas with high social density: The case of Chianti, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 23 pp 183–205
Burns, J. (1978)Leadership. Harper and Row, New York.
Burns, J. (2010)Leadership. Harper Perennial Political Classics, London.
Clark, D., Southern, R. and Beer, J. (2006) Rural governance, community empowerment and the new institutionalism: A case study of the Isle of Wight. Journal of Rural Studies, 23 pp 254-266.
Cleaver, F. (2001) Institutions, Agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to Development. In B. Cooke and U. KhotariParticipation, The New Tyranny? Zed Books, London. 36-55.
Cleaver, F. (2004) The social embeddedness of agency and decision-making. In S. Hickey and G. Mohan (eds) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Zed Books, London. 271-277.
Cocklin, C. (2005) Natural capital and the sustainability of rural communities. In C. Cocklin and J. Dibden (eds)Sustainability and Change in Rural Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney. 171-191.
Conger, J. and Benjamin, B. (1999)Building Leaders: How Successful Companies Develop the Next Generation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Conger, J. and Kanungo, (1988)Charismatic Leadership in Organisations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Davies, A. (2007) Organic or orchestrated: The nature of leadership in rural Australia. Rural Society, 17(2) pp 139-154.
Davies, A. (2009) Understanding local leadership in building the capacity of rural communities in Australia.Geographical Research, 47(4) pp 380-389.
Day, G. (1998) Working with the grain? Towards sustainable rural and community development. Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1) pp 89-105.
Dibden, J. and Cocklin, C. (2003) Capitalising on community: sustainability in ‘Tarra’. In C. Cocklin and M. Alston (eds.)Community Sustainability in Rural Australia: A Question of Capital? Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University. 170-201.
Dibden, J. and Cheshire, L. (2005) Community development. In C. Cocklin and J. Dibden (eds)Sustainability and Change in Rural Australia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney. 212-229.
do Carmo, R.M. (2010) Albernoa revisited: Tracking social capital in a Portuguese village. Sociologia Ruralis, 50 (1) pp 15-30.
Edwards, B. (1998) Charting the discourse of community action: Perspectives from practice in rural Wales.Journal of Rural Studies, 14 (1) pp 63-77.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
