Entity Of Privacy In The Era Of Technology

Authors

  • PRITHIVI RAJ
  • MURTAZA S. NOORANI

Keywords:

Right to Privacy, Technology and Privacy.

Abstract

The shifting sense of privacy from one social background to the next, notably in the eyes of the law, has been a persistent challenge. Technology when seen from the lens of privacy in educational institutions poses a significant threat to the safety and security of all, the most vulnerable and exposed being- young girls, female teachers with the threat of stalking and voyeurism. Furthermore, it is a flagrant breach of students' and teachers' right to privacy and freedom of speech and expression. Notably, there are no regulations or legislation in place to control the installation of surveillance and data collection devices like CCTV or other monitoring/ data collection equipment in Educational Institutes for the purposes of safety, security and regulation. The authors would also examine the above in terms of the right to privacy, necessity and legality. The authors will attempt to showcase reality on the ground along with legal landmarks to satisfy the object and rationale behind the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shiv Shankar Singh, Privacy And Data Protection In India: A Critical Assessment, Journal Of The Indian Law Institute , October-December 2011, Vol. 53, No. 4 Pp. 663- 677 Published By: Indian Law Institute.

David E. Pozen, Privacy-Privacy Trade Offs The University Of Chicago Law Review Vol. 83, No. 1 (Winter 2016), Pp. 221-247 (27 Pages) Published By: University Of Chicago

.J. Angelo Cor, The Nature And Value Of The Moral Right To Privacy, Public Affairs Quarterly Volume 16, Number 4, October 2002

Katayoun Baghai, Privacy As A Human Right: Sociological Theory Author, Sociology, Vol. 46, No. 5, Special Issue: The Sociology Of Human Rights (October 2012), Pp. 951-965 Published By: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Lord Acton, Letter To Bishop Mandell Creighton (April 3, 1887), In The Life And Letters Of Mandell Creighton, Ed. Louise Creighton (New York: Longmans, Green, 1904), Vol. L,Chap. 13

Adam D. Moore, Privacy Rights: Moral And Legal Foundations (University Park, Pa: Penn State University Press, 2010).

Adam D. Moore, Privacy, Security, And Government Surveillance: Wikileaks And The New Accountability, Public Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 2011), Pp. 141-156 Published By: University Of Illinois Press On Behalf Of North American Philosophical Publications

Supreme Court Of The United States, 530 U.S. 1237; 120 S. Ct. 2676; 147 L. Ed. 2d 287; 2000 U.S. Lexis 4126; 68 U.S.L.W. 3756, June 12, 2000, Pp. 341-35

Daniel J. Solove, Understanding Privacy, The University Of Chicago Law Review Vol. 83, No. 1 (Winter 2016), Pp. 221-247 (27 Pages) Published By: University Of Chicago

Peck V. The United Kingdom, No. 44647/98, 62, Echr 2003.

Von Hannover V. Germany, No. 59320/00, 77, Echr 2004.

White V. Sweden, No. 42435/02, 29, Echr 2006.

Kantaru Rajeevaru V. Indian Young Lawyers Association And Ors. Review Petition (Civil) No. 3358/2018 (Sabrimala Review Judgement)

K.S Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1

Gobind v. State of M.P, (1975) 2 SCC 148

Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Govt. of India v. Cricket Association of Bengal, 1995 SCC (2) 161

State of Karnataka v. Associated Management of English Medium Primary & Secondary Schools, (1994) 1 SCC 550]

PUCL v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 568

Kharak Singh v. State of U.P, 1964 SCR (1) 332

Bijoe Emmanuel and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Ors, 1986 SCC (3) 615

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

RAJ, P. ., & NOORANI, M. S. . (2021). Entity Of Privacy In The Era Of Technology. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 3829–3837. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/828