Accountability Practice Based On Define Component Among Guidance And Counseling Teachers In Students At Risk Of Dropping Out Intervention Program
Keywords:
Accountability, Guidance and Counseling Teacher, Students at Risk of Dropping out Intervention Program, DefineAbstract
Students at risk of dropping out intervention program (PIMBC) are an initiative of the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) in addressing the issue of students at risk of dropout. Guidance and Counseling Teachers (GBK) are responsible for planning and implementing this program. Therefore, GBK accountability practices through the define component should be identified in the implementation of PIMBC to achieve program effectiveness. A survey study used to review the level of accountability practices based on gender, duration of service and school location. This study involved 395 GBK people who teach in national secondary schools. Descriptive analysis and inference analysis involving t-test and One-way ANOVA test is used in data analysis. The findings of the study showed that the mean for the define component was 4.03 while the t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the genders. On the other hand, for the duration of service and school location analyzed using one-way ANOVA showed no significant difference. The define component is the basis for GBK in program implementation and is able to influence efforts to achieve the program objectives.
Downloads
References
Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman, Nor Junainah Mohd Isa & Azizah Atan (2013). A Guidance and Counseling Model Practiced Within Malaysian Schools. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 1 No. 4 April 2013.
Adelman, M. & Székely, M. (2016). School Dropout in Central America: An Overview of Trends, Causes, Consequences and Promising Interventions. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7561. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Aida Nubaillah Noor, Salleh Amat & Abu Yazid Abu Bakar (2018). Efikasi Kendiri Kaunseling dan Kecekapan Kaunseling Pelbagai Budaya dalam Kalangan Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. Jurnal Psikoedukasi dan Konseling, 2(2), 14-21.
American School Counselor Association (2012). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
American School Counselor Association (2019). ASCA National Model. Diperoleh daripada https://www.schoolcounselor.org/school-counselors-members/asca-national- model.
Badrujaman, A. (2011). Evaluasi Program Bimbingan dan Kaunseling. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2016. Penerbitan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bakar, A. R., Mohamed, S., & Zakaria, N. S. (2011). Work Values of Malaysian School Counselors: It's Implication on School Counseling. Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 456-461.
Baker, S. B. (2012). A new view of evidence-based practice. Counseling Today. Alexandria, VA: American Counselor Association.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M., Abbott, R., Hill, K., Catalano, R., & Hawkins, J. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 568-582. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.568
Blazer, C. & Hernandez, G. V. (2018). Student Dropout: Risk Factors, Impact of Prevention Programs, and Effective Strategies. Research Services, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Research Brief. Volume 1708. Diperoleh daripada https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED587683
Budenz, D. C. (2012). Accountability practices of pennsylvania school counselors (Order No. 3515463). Diperoleh daripada https://search-proquest- com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/1022083671?accountid=13155
Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 1 (Edisi ketiga). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
De Witte, K., Cabus, S., Thyssen, G., Groot, W. & Van den Brink, H. M. (2013). A critical review of the literature on school dropout. Educational Research Review, 10, 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.002
Edwards, L. (2009). Accountability practices of school counselors (Order No. 3365533). Diperoleh daripada https://search-proquest com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/304829820?accountid=13155
Erford, B. T. (2015). Transforming the school counseling profession (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Fauziah Hanim Jalal, Nurul‘Ain Daud & Nazariah Abd Samad (2015). Kesan Program Pembangunan Sahsiah Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Pelajar. Jurnal Bitara Edisi Khas, Vol. 8.
Furqon & Badrujaman, A. (2011). Model Evaluasi Layanan Dasar Berorientasi Akuntabilitas. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Gysbers, N. C. (2004). Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Programs: The Evolution of Accountability. Professional School Counseling, 8, 1–14.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Panduan Pelaksanaan Perkhidmatan Bimbi ngan dan Kaunseling Di Sekolah Rendah dan Menengah (Keempat). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2018). Bilangan 4 Tahun 2018. Garis panduan mengurus murid berisiko cicir di sekolah. Diperolehi https://www.moe.gov.my/images/KPM/ZOOupload/SPI%20BIL%204%20TAHUN% 202018-1.pdf.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2019). Manual Pengurusan Pencegahan dan Intervensi Murid Berisiko Cicir: SUDI 2.0. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian, KPM.
Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Lovelace, M. D., Reschly, A. L. & Appleton, J. J. (2017). Beyond School Records: The Value of Cognitive and Affective Engagement in Predicting Dropout and On- Time Graduation. Professional School Counseling, 21(1), 1096–2409–21.1. doi:10.5330/1096-2409-21.1.70
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. http://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Mad Islaihi Sabdari (2016). Kompetensi Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Berpandukan Model Pengurusan Perkhidmatan Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana tidak diterbitkan. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Manchelah, N. (2017) Keberkesanan perkhidmatan bimbingan dan kaunseling sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Tesis PhD tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Mizan Adiliah Ahmad Ibrahim (2006). Pelaksanaan perkhidmatan bimbingan dan kaunseling di sekolah. Shah Alam: Cerdik Publications.
Mohd Majid Konting (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Edisi Kelapan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Muijs, D. (2011). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd: London.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
Paolini, A. C. (2015). Impact of accountability measures on perceived counselor self- efficacy and student outcomes. Diperoleh daripada https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/vistas/impact-of-accountability- measures-on-perceived-counselor-self-efficacy-and-student- outcomes.pdf?sfvrsn=16417f2c_8
Putri, M. A., Neviyarni, N., Ahmad, R. & Syukur, Y. (2018). Guidance and Counseling in School Accountability. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Islam), 1(2), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.32505/enlighten.v1i2.731
Ripamonti, E. (2017). Risk Factors for Dropping out of High School: A Review of Contemporary, International Empirical Research. Adolescent Research Review, 3(3), 321-338. doi: 10.1007/s40894-017-0075-y
Robinson, S. B. & Leornard, K. F. (2019). Designing quality survey questions. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Sabella, R. & Booker, B. (2003). Using technology to promote your guidance and counseling program among stakeholders. Professional School Counseling, 6(3), 206-214.
Stone, C. B., & Dahir, C. A. (2007). School Counselor Accountability: A MEASURE of Student Success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Studer, J. R. (2015). The essential school counselor in a changing society. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Tabuchi, T., Fujihara, S., Shinozaki, T., & Fukuhara, H. (2018). Determinants of High-School Dropout: A Longitudinal Study in a Deprived Area of Japan. Journal of Epidemiology. doi:10.2188/jea.je20170163
Tengku Elmi Azlina Tengku Muda & Noriah Mohd Ishak (2014). Kepimpinan Ketua Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling: Implikasi kepada Peningkatan Keberkesanan Perkhidmatan Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah. International Research Management and Innovation Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 469-488.
Topdemir, C. M. (2010). School counselor accountability practices: A national study (Order No. 3432669). Diperoleh daripada https://search-proquest com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/822142567?accountid=13155
Wehrman, J. D., Williams, R., Field, J. & Schroeder, S. D. (2010). Accountability through documentation: What are best practices for school counselors? Journal of School Counseling, 8(38), 1-23.
White, F. A. (2007). The professional school counselor’schallenge: Accountability.
Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory & Research, 3, 62–70.
White, S. & Kelly, F. (2010). The School Counselor's Role in School Dropout Prevention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(2), 227-235. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00014.
Wilkins, J. & Bost, L. W. (2015). Dropout Prevention in Middle and High Schools.
Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(5), 267–275. doi:10.1177/1053451215606697
Young, A. & Kaffenberger, C. (2015). School Counseling Professional Development: Assessing the use of Data to Inform School Counseling Services. Professional School Counseling, 19(1), 1096–2409–19.1. doi:10.5330/1096-2409-19.1.46
Ziomek-Daigle, J. (2016). School Counseling Classroom Guidance: Prevention, Accountability and Outcomes. Los Angeles London: SAGE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
