RISK SOCIETY AND GOVERNANCE: CURRENT ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

Authors

  • Arie Halachmi Linz University Center for Public Administration, Zhongshan University (China) andInstitute of Government, TSU (USA)

Abstract

The paradigm shift from "governing" to "governance" we witness takes place at a time of growing public mistrust in government in general and its use of tax resources in particular. This presents governments and polities with new challenges that have to do with various issues of public accountability, transparency and social responsibility. This paper suggests that, as a result of this shift to governance, more attention must also be given to risk management not only by government but also by other formal and covert participants in the governing process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adshead, M. and Quinn, B. (1998) The move from government to governance: Irish development policy's paradigm shift. Policy & Politics,26 (2) pp 209-225.

Ammons, D. and Canada, B. (2000) Tracking Performance in Local Government Risk Management: A Catalog of Performance Measures. Institute of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Ackerman, J. (2004) Co-governance for accountability: Beyond "exit" and "voice". World Development, 32 (3) pp 447-463.

Auditor General Office of South Australia (1999) Public governance: The financial management framework: A reform initiative for improved management and accountability of public sector resources and risks: Audit comments. Retrieved: 11 October 2010 from <http://www.audit.sa.gov.au/98-99/a3/reform.htm>

Beck, U. (2006) Living in the world risk society. A Hobhouse Memorial Public Lecture given on Wednesday 15 February 2006 at the London School of Economics

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, London.

Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne Suhrkame. Retrieved: 11 October 2010 from http://www.gbv.de/dms/hebis-darmstadt/toc/4155416.pdf

Björk, P. and Johansson, H. (1999) Towards governance theory: In search for a common ground. Retrieved: 8 October 2010 from http://finans.regeringen.se/kommitteer/samverkan/pdf/commonground.pdf

Boorsma, P. (1995) (Un) Connected performance indicators in the criminal justice system. In Halachmi, A. and Grant, D. (eds) Reengineering and Performance Measurement in Criminal Justice and Social Programmes. Ministry of Justice of Western Australia, Perth. 127-143.

Brouwer, M. (2002) Light sentences in fireworks trial. Radio Netherlands. 2April. Retrieved: 11 October 2010 from <http://www.rnw.nl/hotspots/html/enschede020402.html>

Campbell. D. (2009) Fitch face hearings on role of securities ratings. Moody’s, S&P. Retrieved: 2 October 2010 from <http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aifRtdZlvKxg>

Carmichael, P. (2002) Review of public administration briefing paper: Multi-level governance. Retrieved: 2 October 2010 from <http://www.rpani.gov.uk/multilevel.pdf>

Dror, Y. (2001). The Capacity to Govern.Frank Cass, London.

Gabe, J. (ed) (1995) Medicine, Health, and Risk: Sociological Approaches. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.

Giddens, A. (1999) Risk and responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 62 (1) pp 1-10.

Government of Western Australia (1999) Guidelines for managing risk in the western Australian public sector. Better Management, Ministry of the Premier and Cabinet, Perth.

GPRA. (1993) Government performance and results act of 1993. Retrieved:2 October 2010 from <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/mgmt-gpra/gplaw2m.html>

Guidelines (1996) Guidelines for Managing Risk in the Australian Public Service, Management Advisory Board’s Management Improvement Advisory Committee (MAB/MIAC), Report No. 22, Canberra, October 1996.

Halachmi, A. (2002) Who gets what when and how: Performance measurement for accountability? For improved performance? International Review of Public Administration, 7(1) pp 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-30

How to Cite

Halachmi, A. . (2010). RISK SOCIETY AND GOVERNANCE: CURRENT ISSUES AND CHALLENGES. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 16(2), 1–27. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/74

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2010): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2010 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.