The Capacity of Runway of Ngurah Rai International Airport Bali Based on The Doratask Method

Authors

  • Suharto Abdul Majid
  • Emilia Rahajeng Larasati
  • Wynd Rizaldy
  • Edhie Budi Setiawan
  • Yosi Pahala
  • Lira Agusinta
  • Prasadja Ricardianto
  • Mochamad Arif Hernawan

Keywords:

Air Transportation, Airport, Runway, Over Capacity, Doratask Method.

Abstract

This research aims to know the runway capacity at Ngurah Rai International Airport Denpasar Bali using the Doratask Method. Doratask Method is the method of calculating the capacity of runway adopted from the ICAO project 2009, which is also used to analyze the size of a runway in several ICAO country members in the South America Region (SAM Region). Observation, documentation, interview, and literature study are carried out to obtain the data of runway capacity at Ngurah Rai Airport Bali. The sample in this study is the data of aircraft movements for about 12 hours of flight during peak hours. Direct observation is done for seven full days on runway 09 and runway 27. The research finds the value of runway capacity at Ngurah Rai Airport Bali as many as 18 aircraft movements. The condition of Ngurah Rai Airport when the survey is done is that it can accommodate around 15 changes. It means the runway capacity at Ngurah Rai Airport Bali has been overcapacity. The use of Doratask Method to calculate runway capacity is considered most suitable to be implemented at Ngurah Rai Airport Bali because the value is close to the real condition in the field in line with the philosophy of runway capacity, that is the capability of runway to accommodate the aircraft movements for take-off and landing with no delay

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arca, J., Roberto. (2009). Guide for the Application of a Common Metodology for Calculation of Airport and ATC Sectors Capacity in the CAR/SAM Region. Regional Project ICAO RLA/06/901. Lima, Perú.

Bonnefoy, P. A. (2008). Scalability of the air transportation system and development of multi-airport systems: A worldwide perspective. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

Correia, A. R., & Wirasinghe, S. C. (2013). Modeling Airport Landside Performance. In Konstantinos G. Zografos, G. Andreatta, & A. R. Odoni (Eds.), In Modelling and Managing Airport Performance (1 ed., pp. 1-26): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Gelhausen, M. C., Berster, P., & Wilken, D. (2013). Do airport capacity constraints have a serious impact on the future development of air traffic? Journal of Air Transport Management, 28, 3-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.12.004

Harsha, P. (2009). Mitigating airport congestion: market mechanisms and airline response models (Doctor Disertation), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Horonjeff, R., McKelvey, F. X., Sproule, W., & Young, S. (2010). Planning and design of airports (5 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

ICAO. (2009a). Doc.9426 Air Traffic Service Planning Manual. Retrieved from Canada:

ICAO. (2009b). Manual for the ATN using IPS Standards and Protocols (Doc 9896). Retrieved from Canada:

Ioannis, A., & John-Paul, C. (2002). Runway Operations Planning: A Two-Stage Heuristic Algorithm. In AIAA's Aircraft Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) 2002 Technical Forum.

Kolos-Lakatos, T. (2013). The influence of runway occupancy time and wake vortex separation requirements on runway throughput. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

Norman, A., Saleh, M., & Paul, W. (2011). Airport Engineering: Planning, Design, and Development of 21st Century Airports. United States: John Wiley & Sons.

Pitfield, D. E., & Jerrard, E. A. (1999). Monte Carlo comes to Rome: a note on the estimation of unconstrained runway capacity at Rome Fiumucino International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 5(4), 185-192.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(99)00012-5

Poole Jr, R. W. (2013). Organization and Innovation in Air Traffic Control. Retrieved from Washington:

Senguttuvan, P. (2006). Air Cargo: Engine for economic growth and development–a case study of Asian region. Paper presented at the National Urban Freight Conference.

Transportation Research Board, A. (2012). Lessons learned from airport safety management systems pilot studies: A synthesis of airport practice (Synthesis 37). Retrieved from Washington, D.C.:

Wicaksana, A., Arya, Effendi, F., Maulana, & Warsito, T. (2018). Slot Time Capacity In Peak Hour at Soekarno-Hatta Imternational Airport. Paper presented at the Conference on Global Research on Sustainable Transport (GROST 2017).

Zografos, K. G., Andreatta, G., Eenige, M., JA, & Madas, M., A. (2013). A Decision Support System for Integrated Airport Performance Assessment and Capacity Management. Modelling Managing Airport Performance, 27-65.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-28

How to Cite

Majid, S. A. ., Larasati, E. R. ., Rizaldy, W. ., Setiawan, E. B. ., Pahala, Y. ., Agusinta, L. ., Ricardianto, P. ., & Hernawan, M. A. . (2021). The Capacity of Runway of Ngurah Rai International Airport Bali Based on The Doratask Method. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 2022–2039. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/685