THRUSTERS, SCOOPERS, SCROUNGERS AND SQUIRRELS: A TAXONOMY OF PUBLIC SECTOR AUDIT AND ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS

Authors

  • Stuart Kells Monash University

Abstract

The concept of public sector accountability is attracting a great deal of attention both inside and outside the academy. Performance auditing is one of a large and growing number of mechanisms that are used to enhance accountability. Though it is an important and prominent feature of public administration in many countries, performance auditing is often said to be difficult to define. Kells and Hodge (2009) proposed a framework for defining performance auditing, which they then used to study other types of accountability and review mechanisms, including management audits, whistleblower laws, freedom of information laws, open book policies and citizen engagement models. This paper formalizes and generalizes Kells and Hodge’s framework. After expressing the framework using set function notation and concepts from game theory, the paper then applies the elements of the framework to develop a general taxonomy of audit and accountability mechanisms. The taxonomy is presented graphically, and then in the form of a new terminology of mechanism types. The paper concludes with directions for future research regarding the design and evaluation of accountability mechanisms

References

Adams, N. (1986) ‘Efficiency Auditing in the Australian Audit Office’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), pp. 189–200.

Barzelay, M. (1996) ‘Performance Auditing and the New Public Management: Changing Roles and Strategies of Central Audit Institutions’, in: OECD (1996), Performance Auditing and the Modernization of Government, Paris: OECD.

Barzelay, M. (1997) ‘Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Strategies in the OECD’, Governance, 10(3), July 1997, pp. 235–60.

Bovens, M. (2006) Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Framework, European Governance Papers (EUROGOV), no C-06-01, accessed 15 February 2009 at http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-06-01.pdf

Braithwaite, J. (2007) Regulatory Capitalism: How it Works. Edward Elgar.Cheltenham.

Brewer, G. A. and S. C. Selden (1998) ‘Whistle Blowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), pp. 413–40.

Burrowes, A. and M. Persson (2000) ‘The Swedish Management Audit: A Precedent for Performance and Value for Money Audits’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), pp. 85–97.

Case, J. (1995) Open-Book Management: The Coming Business Revolution, New York: Harper Business.

Case, J. (1998) The open-book experience: Lessons from over 100 companies who successfully transformed themselves, Reading: Addison Wesley.

Dewar, D. (1985a) ‘Value for money audit: the first 800 years’, Public Finance and Accountancy, August 30, pp. 10–12.

Dewar, D. (1985b) ‘Cutting through the blurred distinctions of what is VFM’, Accountancy Age, April 11, 1985.Dunleavy, P. and H. Margetts (2000) ‘The advent of digital government: Public bureaucracies and the state in the internet age’, Paper delivered to the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington, 4 September 2000.

Ettema, J. S. and T. L. Glasser (1998) Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue, New York: Columbia University Press.

Flesher, D. L., W. D. Samson and G. J. Previts (2003) ‘The origins of value-for-money auditing: the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad: 1827–1830’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(5), pp. 374–86.

Frey, B. S. (1994) ‘Supreme Auditing Institutions: A Politico-Economic Analysis’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 1, pp. 169–76.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-30

How to Cite

Kells, S. . (2010). THRUSTERS, SCOOPERS, SCROUNGERS AND SQUIRRELS: A TAXONOMY OF PUBLIC SECTOR AUDIT AND ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 16(1), 1–25. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/68

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2010): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2010 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.