Methods For Evaluation Of The Education Quality In Higher Education Institutions
Keywords:
competence, education quality, distance higher education, education quality evaluation, monitoring.Abstract
The article aims to disclose the essence of the “education quality” concept, to study the international approaches and concepts of the higher education quality evaluation, to analyze specific methods and tools within one of the approaches. Establishing education quality assessment necessitates choosing the teaching personnel of higher educational institution, as well as a target group of students and independent experts in the field of organization of the educational process, on a distance basis particularly. Monitoring requires using such methods as interviews, surveys, questionnaires, and similar. The results were processed according to the authors’ algorithm allowing to calculate the quality of education. The authors’ interpretation of the concept of “education quality” is proposed. Given the insufficient study of the topic of distance education in the domestic scientific discourse, authors’ attention to this problem is an important contribution to study of the issue of distance education. The methods used to evaluate the education quality in higher education institutions at the international level are an integral element in the development of the educational space, although they cause certain controversy and criticism. The authors advise to select the methods for evaluating the educational process quality with account of the specific evaluation stage and purpose.
Downloads
References
Alajmi, M. (2019). The impact of e-portfolio use on the development of professional standards and life skills of students: a case study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1714–1735. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(12)
Borzov, Y. V., Koryagina, I. I., Votyakova, O. I., Kurileva, N. V. (2016). Upravleniye kachestvom obrazovaniya na osnove monitoringovykh issledovaniy [Education quality management based on monitoring studies]. Obrazovaniye i Nauka / The Education and Science, 6(135), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2016–6–42–61
Dobrota, M. (2016). ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity: What if the award factor was excluded? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2, 480–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23527
Dudukalov, E. V., & Laptander, A. B. (2015). Obrazovaniye i nauka: kak prodolzhat' modernizatsiyu v usloviyakh retsessii? [ Education and science: How to proceed with modernization in the conditions of recession?]. Nauka i obrazovaniye: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravleniye / Science and education: economy; entrepreneurship; law and management, 1, 7–13.
Glushko, I. V., Zueva, T. M. (2018). Monitoring kachastva obrazovatelnoy deyatelnosti v vuzye: Teoretiko-pravovoy i prakticheskiy aspekty [Monitoring the quality of educational activities in higher educational establishment: theoretically-legal and practical aspects]. Perspektivy Nauki I Obrazovaniya / Perspectives of Science & Education, 4(34), 26–32.
Hasan, M., Hatidja, S., Guampe, F. A., Maruf, M. I. (2019). Entrepreneurship learning, positive psychological capital and entrepreneur competence of students: a research study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(30)
Johnsen, H. C. G. (2016). The new natural resource: Knowledge development, society and economics. Gower.
Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (2001). Using assessment to improve the quality of education. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards,judgement and moderation. SAGE.
Miller, B. A. (2016). Assessing organizational performance in higher education. Jossey- Bass.
Modorskaya, G. G., Kovaleva, T. Yu., Kovalev, N. Yu. (2014). Analiz motivov i kachestva distantsionnogo obrazovaniya kak instrumentariy sovershenstvovaniya sistemy obrazovaniya v vuze [Analysis of the motives and the quality of distance education as a tool to improve the e-learning system in the university]. VPNIPU / PNRPU Bulletin, 4(25), 89–101.
Noaman, A. Y., Ragab, A. H. M., Madbouly, A. I., Khedra, A. M., & Fayoumi, A. G. (2017). Higher education quality assessment model: towards achieving educational quality standard. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 23–46. http:// doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034262
Raev, K. (2018). Instrumentariy i resultaty aprobatsyy polikomponentnoy modeli nezavisimoy otsenki kachestva vysshego obrazovaniya [Tools and approbation results for the multicomponent model of independent higher education quality assessment]. Vestnik Universiteta / Bulletin of University, 5, 181–188. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-5-181-188
Raev, K. V., Krasnov, E. V., Yakimchuk, O. N., Timoshina, E. N. (2019). Novyye aspekty i podkhody v realizatsyi modeli nezavisimoy otsenki kachestva vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossiiskoy Federatsyi i yeyo resultaty [New aspects and approaches in implementation of the model of independent assessment of quality of higher education in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Chyuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I. Ya. Yakovleva / Bulletin of the CSPU named of I.
Ya. Yakovlev, 1(101), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.26293/chgpu.2019.101.1.023
Sazonova, N. N. (2017). Gumanitarnoye obrazovaniye kak osnova formirovaniya chelovecheskogo potentsyala obshestva XXI veka [Humanitarian education as the foundation for the formation of the human potential of the 21st century society]. Sovremennoye obrazovaniye: Soderzhaniye, Technologiyi, Kachestvo / Modern Education: Content, Technology, Quality, 2, 15–17.
Stack, M. L. (2013). The Times Higher Education ranking product: visualising excellence through media. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4, 560–582.
Tarasenko, A. S. (2017). Kompetentnost i krizis obrazovaniya [Competence and the crisis of education]. Psikhologiya, Sotsiologiya i Pedagogika / Psychology, Sociology and Pedagogy, 4(67), 28–33.
World declaration on higher education for the twenty-first century: vision and action. (1998). Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_eng.htm.
Zotova, V. A. (2017). Mezhdunarodnyy opyt uchastiya studentov v otsenke kachestva obrazovaniya [International experience of students' participation in assessing the quality of education]. Kreativnaya Economika / Creative Economy, 11(3), 303–314
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
