PERFORMANCE AUDITING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: RECONCEPTUALISING THE TASK

Authors

  • Stuart Kells Monash University
  • Graeme Hodge Monash University

Abstract

Performance auditing (PA) is a prominent feature of public administration in many countries and is, today, often characterised through words such as efficiency, effectiveness and economy. The PA literature, however, considers a far wider variety of characteristics to be relevant and, therefore, a broader definition to be appropriate. This paper reviews the history of definitions of PA and concludes that it has thus far been defined in ways that lack clarity and leave definitional difficulties unresolved. The paper adopts a heuristic approach in examining elements making up past PA definitions and concludes that it is time to reconceptualise PA. Hence a new definitional framework for PA is proposed which rejects the so-called three Es construct and instead offers the five elements of independence, authorisation, discovery, synthesis and publication. This framework, it is argued, is stronger than any previous definitions, relevant to both the public and private sectors and also helpful in interpreting the place of many alternatives to PA such as investigative journalism, open book policies, whistleblower legislation and Gateway Reviews.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, N. (1986) Efficiency auditing in the Australian Audit Office.Australian Journal of Public Administration, 45 (3)pp 189-200.

Arens, A.,Best,P.,Shailer,G.,Feidler, B.and Loebbecke, J.(2002) Auditing in Australia (5thEdition).Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest.

Barzelay, M. (1996) Performance auditing and the new public management: Changing roles and strategies of central audit institutions.In Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government.OECD, Paris.

Barzelay, M. (1997) Central audit institutions and performance auditing: Acomparative analysis of organizational strategies in the OECD.Governance, 10 (3)pp 235-60.

Bovens, M. (2006) Analysing and assessing public accountability: Aconceptual framework.European governance papers (EUROGOV), No.C-06-01. Retrieved: 15 February 2009 fromhttp://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-06-01.pdf

Braithwaite, J. (2007) Regulatory Capitalism: How it Works. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Brooks, R.A. (1996) Blending two cultures: State legislative auditing and evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, 71 pp 15-28.

Burrowes, A. and Persson, M.(2000) The Swedish management audit: Aprecedent for performance and value for money audits.Managerial Auditing Journal, 15 (3) pp85-97.

Burton, J.C. and Fairfield, P.(1982) Auditing evolution in a changing environment.Auditing, 1 (2) pp1-22.

Cashin, J.A. (1965) Careers and Opportunities in Accounting. E Dutton & Co, New York, NY.

Chatfield, M. (1977) A History of Accounting Thought(Revised Edition).Robert E Krieger,Huntington, NY.

Chelimsky, E. (1996) Auditing and evaluation: Whither the relationship?New Directions for Evaluation, 71 (Fall)pp 61-7.

Davis, D.F. (1990) Do you want a performance audit or a program evaluation? Public Administration Review, January/February pp 35-41.

Desautels, L.D. (1997) Evaluation as an essential component of ‘value-for-money’.In E. Chelimsky and W.R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook.Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Dewar, D. (1985a) Value for money audit: The first 800 years.Public Finance and Accountancy, August 30, pp 10-12.

Dewar, D. (1985b) Cutting through the blurred distinctions of what is VFM.Accountancy Age, April 11.

Divorski, S. (1996)Differences in the approaches of auditor and evaluators to the examination of government policies and programs.New Directions for Evaluation, 71 pp7-14.

Elliott, R.K. (1994) Commentary on: Confronting the future: Choices for the attest function.Accounting Horizons, 8 (3)pp 106-24.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-30

How to Cite

Kells, S. . ., & Hodge, G. . (2009). PERFORMANCE AUDITING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: RECONCEPTUALISING THE TASK. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 15(2), 33–60. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/60

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2009): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2009 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.