GENERATIONAL STRATIFICATION: ASPIRATIONS OF GENERATION NEXT
Abstract
Despite continuing recovery from the global financial crisis and improving employment levels, there is widespread consensus that Australia faces challenges of talent retention and skills shortages in both the public and private sectors. Currently, Generation Z—a demographic representing approximately 1.3 million Australians—is entering into higher education and the workforce. An understanding of the values and mindset of this generation is critical to the future Australian workplace in terms of delivering relevant education for both Generation Z and the workplace for which they are being educated. This paper uses qualitative research to identify the career aspirations, perceptions of work and family, and preference readiness for employment (particularly within the public sector) of Generation Z. The research found an increasingly conservative generation seeking high levels of flexibility and autonomy within the workplace. Implications for the public sector marketing itself as an employer of choice are discussed.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2009) A picture of the nation: The statistician’s report of the 2006 census. ABS, Canberra.
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K. and Judge, T.A. (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment,9 (1/2) pp 9-30.
Beatson, A., Lings, I. and Guidergan, S.P. (2008) Service staff attitudes, organisational practices and performance drivers. Journal of Management & Organisation, 14 (2) pp 168-79.
Blount, Y., Castleman, T. and Swatman, M. (2005) E-Commerce, human resource strategies and competitive advantage. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9 (3) pp 73-89.
Bradley, S. (1991) An empirical analysis of occupational expectations. Applied Economics, 23 pp 1159-74.
Bradley, S. (1995) The Youth Training Scheme: Acritical review of the evaluation literature. International Journal of Manpower,16 (4) pp 30-56.
Chen, P.J. and Choi, Y. (2007) Generational differences in work values: Astudy of hospitality management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (6) pp 595-615.
Connor, H. and Shaw, S. (2008) Graduates, training, human resource development, recruitment, transition management. Education and Training, 50 (5) pp 357-65.
Crumpacker, M. and Crumpacker, J.D. (2007) Succession planning and generational stereotypes: Should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Personnel Management, 36 (4) pp 349-69.
Cully, M. (2008) Bittersweet: Being young in an older persons’world. Presentation to the Workplace Research Centre Annual Conference:Securing Today’s Workforce for the Future: The Labour of Tomorrow, Sydney, June.
Curriculum Council of Western Australia (2008) School comparison statistics 2008. Retrieved: 28 September 2009 from http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet/Communications/Reports_Statistics/School_Comparison_Statistics#
Department of Local Government and Regional Development (2006) Statistical snapshot -population and demographics. Retrieved: 2 March 2006fromhttp://www.dlgrd.wa.gov.au/content/asp?page=statisticInfo/pubBin/StatSnapshot/populationDemographics.asp
Department of the Premier and Cabinet (2007) Rethinking recruitment. Discussion paper, August.Government of Western Australia, Perth.
Erickson, T.J. (2008) Plugged In: The Generation Y Guide to Thriving at Work. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
Fontana, D. (1996)Getting to know Generation Xis half the battle for managers.American Banker, 161 (28) pp 10A.
Glass, A. (2007) Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training,39 (2) pp 98-103.
Hakim, C. (1987) Strategies and Choices in the Design of Social Research. Allen & Unwin, London.
Hill, R.P. (2002) Managing across generations in the 21stcentury: Important lessons from the ivory trenches. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11 (1) pp 60-6.
Hogarth, T., Winterbotham, M., Hasluck, C., Carter,K., Daniel, W., Green, A. and Morrison, J. (2007) Employer and university engagement in the use and development of graduate skills, DFES RR835A.Department for Education and Skills, London.
Holland, P., Sheenan, C. and de Cieri, H. (2007) Attracting and retaining talent: Exploring human resources development trends in Australia. Human Resources Development International,10 (3) pp 247-62.
Hough, L.M., Eaton, N.K. and Dunnette, M.D. (1990) Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effects of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology,75 pp 581-95.
Johnson, J.A. and Lopes, J. (2008) The intergenerational workforce revisited. Organization Development Journal,26 (1) pp 31-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
