THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PROCUREMENT FLEXIBILITY: A MODEL FOR SUPPLIERS AND MANUFACTURERS
Abstract
This paper is designed to extend knowledge of flexibility in manufacturing supply chains through examination of procurement entity relationships, flexibility classifications and their commonalities as used by practitioners. Data were collected from procurement, supply chain, logistics and manufacturing managers in Australian companies in 17 Standard Industry Classification categories. The research findings suggest that Australian manufacturing organisations have not sufficiently integrated their manufacturing strategies with their organisational strategies and, more importantly, suppliers to manufacturers do not have sufficient flexibility in their supply activities. One limitation pertains to the possibility that targeted respondents may not have the assumed intimate knowledge of their organisation’s procurement activities, or are biased regarding their view of the quality of the organisation’s procurement performance. The major contributions of the study are the development of a definition of procurement flexibility (ProcFlex), a conceptual model for use as a benchmarking tool to measure procurement flexibility, and the presentation of an integrated model of ProcFlex for use by manufacturers and their suppliers to be more responsive and increase competitive advantage.
Downloads
References
Albino, V. and Garavelli, A.C. (1998) Some effects of flexibility and dependability on cellular manufacturing system performance.ComputersandIndustrial Engineering, 35 (3-4)pp 491-4.
Askenazy, P.,Thesmar, D. and Thoenig, M. (2006) On the relation between organisational practices and new technologies: The role of (time-based) competition.The Economic Journal, 116pp128-54.
Aprille, D.,Garavelli, A.C. and Giannoccaro, I. (2005) Operations planning and flexibility in a supply chain.Production Planning and Control, 16 (1)pp 21-31.
Baily, P.,Farmer, D.,Crocker, B.,Jessop, D. and Jones, D. (2009) Procurement Principles and Management (10thEdition).Prentice Hall, Essex.
Baker, R.,Thompson, C. and Mannion, R. (2006) Q methodology in health economics.Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 11 (1)pp 38-45.
Barnes-Schuster, D.,Bassok, Y. and Anupindi, R. (2002) Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options.Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,4 (3)pp 171-207.
Beach, R.,Muhlemann, A.P.,Price, D.H.R.,Paterson, A. and Sharp,J.A. (2000) Manufacturing operations and strategic flexibility: Survey and cases.International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(1)pp 7-30.
Beamon, B.M. (1999) Measuring supply chain performance.International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19 (3)pp 275-92.
Beaumont, N. (2005) Best practice in Australian manufacturing sites.Technovation, 25 pp 1291-7.
Boyle, T.A. and Scherrer-Rathje, M. (2009) An empirical examination of the best practices to ensure manufacturing flexibility: Lean alignment.Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,20 (3) pp 348-66.
Burt, D.N.,Dobler, D.W. and Starling, S.L. (2003) World Class Supply Management -The Key to Supply Management (7thEdition).McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY.
Chan, F.T.S.,Bhagwat, R. and Wadhwa, S. (2009) Study on suppliers‘flexibility in supply chains: Is real-time control necessary? International Journal of Production Research, 47 (4)pp 965-87.
Chandra, C. and Grabis, J. (2009) Role of flexibility in supply chain design and modelling.Introduction to the special issue.Omega,37 pp 743-5.
Christopher, M. and Ryals, L. (1999) Supply chain strategy: Its impact on shareholder value.The International Journal of Logistics Management, 10 (1)pp 1-10.
Churchill, G.A. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs.Journal of Marketing Research, 16 pp 64-73.
Cox, A. (1996) Relational competence and strategic procurement management.European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2 (1)pp 57-70.
Cross, R.M. (2005) Exploring attitudes: The case for Q methodology.Health Education Research, 20 (2)pp 206-13.
Crum, M.R.,Johnson, D.A. and Allen, B.J.(1998) A longitudinal assessment of EDI use in the US motor carrier industry.Transportation Journal, 38 (1)pp 15-28.
DeLeeuw, A. and Volberda, H. (1996) On the concept of flexibility: A dual control perspective.Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 24 (2)pp 121-39.
DeMeyer, A.,Nakane, J.,Miller, J.G.andFerdows,K. (1989) Flexibility: The next competitive battle -the manufacturing futures survey.Strategic Management Journal, 10pp 135-44.
Dun and Bradstreet. (2005) Business Who’s Who of Australia-User Guide, Dun and Bradstreet MarketingPty Ltd. Available at:<http://www.library.uow.edu.au/eresources/databases>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
