INDIGENOUS EMPLOYMENT: THE RIO TINTO ALCAN INITIATIVE IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA
Abstract
Recognising that the low labour force participation rate is a primary factor underpinning the significant disadvantages experienced by Indigenous Australians, the Federal Government has targeted job creation through three main avenues: creating the Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) scheme; expressing commitment to developing business opportunities for economic independence; and strengthening a prevailing assumption that the mining industry will provide Indigenous people in remote areas with employment. This paper reports that: the restructuring of CDEP will lessen employment opportunities for Indigenous people; Indigenous entrepreneurship has not been significant in generating income for Aboriginal people in rural areas; and Australian mining being a substantial employer of Indigenous people in remote areas is yet to be realised. Acknowledging that further research and monitoring is warranted, this paper describes the employment outcomes of Indigenous people who participated in a vocational-educational program conducted by the multinational mining company Rio Tinto Alcan at the remote centre of Nhulunbuy in Australia’s Northern Territory.
References
Altman, J.C.(2009) Beyond closing the gap: Valuing diversity in Indigenous Australia. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research,ANU, Canberra.
Altman, J.C., Biddle, N. and Hunter, B.H. (2005) Ahistorical perspective on Indigenous socioeconomic outcomes in Australia, 1971-2001. Australian Economic History Review, 45 (3) pp 273-95.
Altman, J.C. and Gray, M.C. (2005) The economic and social impacts of the CDEP scheme in remote Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 40(3) pp 399-410.
Altman, J.C., Gray, M. and Levitus, R. (2005) Policy issues for the Community Development Employment Projects Scheme in rural and remote Australia. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ANU, Canberra.
Altman, J.C., Gray, M.C. and Sanders, W.G. (2000) Indigenous Australians working for welfare: What difference does it make? The Australian Economic Review, 33 (4) pp 355-62.
Altman, J.C. and Hunter, B.H. (1998) Indigenous poverty. In R. Fincher and J. Nieuwenhuysen (eds) Australian Poverty.Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.
Altman, J.C. and Jordan, K. (2009) The untimely abolition of the Community Development Employment Program. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research,ANU, Canberra.
Aluminator(2009) Rio Tinto Alcan –ALERT trainees graduation day (May/June/July,p14).
Arafura Times(2009) Bunkhouse at cattle station(12 August, p1).
Arthur, W.S. (2002) Autonomy and the Community Development Employment Projects scheme. Centre for AboriginalEconomic Policy and Research,ANU, Canberra.
Australian Core Skills Framework (ACSF) (2008) A summary. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra.
Australian Government(2007)Indigenous programs: Business and employment. Retrieved:1 September2009from<http://www.oeeo.wa.gov.au/documents/diversitybizz/past%20articles/Indigenous%20programs%20and&20employment.pdf>
Barker, T. (2006) Employment outcomes for Aboriginal people: An exploration of experiences and challenges in the Australian minerals industry. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining Sustainable Minerals Institute,University of Queensland, St Lucia.
Barker, T. and Brereton, D. (2005)Survey of local Aboriginal people formerly employed at Century mine: Indentifying factors that contribute to voluntary turnover. Paper No. 4. Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining Research,Brisbane.Retrieved:1 September 2009 from http://www.csrm.uq.edu.au//docs/CSRM%20Research%20Paper%204.pdf
Bradley, S.,Draca, M.,Green, C. and Leeves, G. (2007) The magnitude of educational disadvantage of Indigenous minority groups in Australia. Journal of Population Economics, 20(3) pp 547-69.
Coombs, H.C. (1995) Aboriginal Autonomy: Issues and Strategies. Cambridge University Press,Melbourne.
Crawley, A. and Sinclair, A. (2003) Indigenous human resource practices in Australian mining companies: Towards an ethical model. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4) pp 361-73.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
