Experimental and theoretical studies of sandwich beams made of steel, concrete, and steel have shown interesting results.

Authors

  • deepika shivakoti
  • KUMAR G VINOD

Abstract

Steel plates are subjected to axial and shear stresses to test theories of full and partial contact. Stud connections and frictional forces between steel plates and concrete at both the supports and load sites are included in the partial interaction research. Based on the partial interaction theory, the results of DSC beam testing are compared to the theoretical predictions. According to the findings, a theoretical approach may be used confidently to analyse fundamentally supported DSC beams of any shape. Various building techniques are described by terminology like "sandwich beams," "double skin composite structure," and "shear connections."

References

Al-Amery RIM, Roberts TM (1990). Non-linear finite difference analysis of composite beams with partial interaction. Comput. Struct., 35: 81-87. Dogan O (1997). Fatigue of welded stud

shear connectors in doubleskin composite construction. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales College of Cardiff, UK.

Dogan O (2010). Full and partial interaction analysis of double skin composite beams with frictional force. Steel and Composite Structures (in press).

Gara F, Ranzi G, Leoni G (2006). Time analysis of composite beams with partial interaction using available modelling techniques: A comparative study. J. Constr. Steel Res., 62: 917- 930.

Girhammar UA, Pan DH, Gustafsson A (2009). Exact dynamic analysis of composite beams with partial interaction. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 51: 565-582.

Jeong Y (2008). Simplified model to predict partial-interactive structural performance of steel–concrete composite slabs. J. Constr. Steel Res.. 64: 238–246.

Jeong Y, Kim H, Kim S (2005). Partial-interaction analysis with push-out tests. J. Constr. Steel Res., 61: 1318-1331.

Johnson RP (1975). Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete. Vol. 1: Beams, Columns, Frames, and Applications in Building. Crosby Lockwood Staples, London.

Johnson RP (1981). Loss of interaction in short-span composite beams and plates. J. Constr. Steel Res., 1: 11-16.

Johnson RP (1994). Beams, slabs, columns, and frames for buildings. Composite structures of steel and concrete, vol. 1. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Knowles PR (1973). Composite Steel and Concrete Construction. Butterworths, London.

Narayanan R, Wright HD, Francis RW, Evans HR (1982). Double-skin composite construction for submerged tube tunnels. Steel Constr. Today, 1: 185-189.

Newmark NM, Siess CP, Viest IM (1951). Tests and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction. Proc. Soc. Exper. Stress. Anal., 9: 75-92.

Oduyemi TOS, Wright HD (1989). An experimental investigation into the behaviour of double skin sandwich beams.

J. Constr. Steel Res., 14: 197-220.

Oehlers DJ, Bradford MA (1999). Elementary behaviour of composite steel & concrete structural members. Butterworth- Heinemannn.

Oehlers DJ, Seracino R, Yeo MF (2000). Fatigue behaviour of composite steel and concrete beams with stud shear connections. Progress Struct. Eng. Mater., 2: 187-195.

Queiroza FD, Vellascob PCGS, Nethercota DA (2007). Finite element modelling of composite beams with full and partial shear connection. J. Constr. Steel Res., 63: 505–521.

Ranzi G (2008). Locking problems in the partial interaction analysis of multi-layered composite beams. Eng. Struct., 30: 2900-2911.

Ranzi G, Bradford MA (2007). Direct stiffness analysis of a composite beam-column element with partial interaction. Comput. Struct., 85: 1206-1214.

Ranzi G, Gara F, Ansourian P (2006). General method of analysis for composite beams with longitudinal and transverse partial interaction. Comput. Struct., 84: 2373-2384.

Roberts TM (1985). Finite difference analysis of composite beams with partial interaction. Comput. Struct., 3: 469-473.

Roberts TM, Dogan O (1998). Fatigue of welded stud shear connectors in steel–concrete–steel sandwich beams. J. Constr. Steel Res., 45: 301-320.

Sousa Jr. JBM, Oliveira CEM, da Silva AR (2010). Displacement-based nonlinear finite element analysis of composite beam columns with partial interaction. J. Constr. Steel Res., 66: 772-779.

Veljkovic M (1996). Behaviour and resistance of composite slab. Ph.D. Thesis. Lulea University, Sweden.

Wright HD, Oduyemi TOS (1991). Partial interaction analysis of double skin composite beams. J. Constr. Steel Res., 19: 253-283.

Wright HD, Oduyemi TOS, Evans HR (1991a). The experimental behaviour of double skin composite elements. J. Constr. Steel Res., 19: 97-110.

Wright HD, Oduyemi TOS, Evans HR (1991b). The design of double skin composite elements. J. Constr. Steel Res., 19: 111- 132.

Yam LCP (1981). Design of Composite Steel-Concrete Structures. Surrey University. Thesis.

Yam LCP, Chapman JC (1968). The inelastic behaviour of simply supported composite beams of steel and concrete. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 4: 651-683.

Yam LCP, Chapman JC (1972). The inelastic behaviour of continuous composite beams of steel and concrete. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 53: 487-501.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

shivakoti, deepika . ., & VINOD, K. G. . . (2020). Experimental and theoretical studies of sandwich beams made of steel, concrete, and steel have shown interesting results. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 26(3), 20–27. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/508