GOVERNANCE: A PROCUREMENT PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
Substantial attention has recently been given to governance and internal control systems of organisations, particularly in the procurement environment. Poor governance has, in the past, led to several major corporate collapses and, on a smaller scale, poor governance or inadequate internal control processes has resulted in fraud and pilferage. Although there are many avenues for organisations to reprimand the perpetrators, punishment is often insubstantial or nonexistent. This article investigates the factors fostering such fraudulent behaviour and the resources available for deterring these acts. It will also explore the various stages of procurement—contract planning, formation and management—and suggest how organisations can use procurement as a tool to improve governance.
Downloads
References
Army News Service (2007) Army fights contracting fraud. Defense & AT-L, 37 pp 47-8.
Cable, J. (2007) FAR amendment calls for ethics clause in federal contracts over $5 million. Government Procurement, 15 p 8.
Barlow, R. (2007) Combating fraud & abuse. Healthcare Purchasing News, 31 pp 58-62.
Barr, A. (2007) District of Columbia: Procurement system needs major reform: GAO-07-159. GAO Reports. US Government Accountability Office, Washington.
Clarke, F., Dean, G. and Oliver, K. (2003) Corporate Collapse: Accounting, Regulatory and Ethical Failure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF) (2008) Procurement practice guide for public authorities.State Supply Commission, Government of Western Australia.
Dignam, A. (2005) The role of competition in determining corporate governance outcomes: Lessons from Australia‘s corporate governance system. Modern Law Review, 68 pp 765-97.
Durant, A. (2005) The enemy within. Engineering Management, 15 pp 30-3.
Gray, P. (2003) Psychology. Worth Publishers,New York, NY.
Hart, O. (1983) The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14 pp 366-82.
Hilton, R. (2008) Managerial Accounting.McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
James, J. (1995) Contract Management in Australia. Addison Wesley Longman, South Melbourne.
Lander, G., Kimball, V. and Martyn, K. (2008) Government procurement fraud. CPA Journal, 78 pp 16-24.
Leung, P. and Cooper, B. (2003) The mad hatter‘s corporate tea party. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18 pp 505-16.
Lowe, D. and Leiringer, R. (2006) Commercial Management of Projects: Defining the Discipline.Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
McCampbell, A. and Rood, T. (1997) Ethics in government: A survey of misuse of position for personal gain and its implicationsfor developing acquisition strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 16 pp 1107-16.
Mardjono, A. (2005) A tale of corporate governance: Lessons why firms fail. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20 pp 272-83.
Pass, C. (2004) Corporate governance and the role of non-executive directors in large UK companies: An empirical study. Corporate Governance, 4 pp 52-63.
Reason, J. (2006) Managing the risks of organizational accidents, Aldershot, Ashgate.
Robbins, S., Bergman, R., Stagg, I. and Coulter, M. (2000) Management.Pearson Education, Sydney.
Robbins, S., Millett, B., Cacioppe, R. and Waters-Marsh, T. (2001) Organisational Behaviour.Pearson Education, Sydney.
Storey, C. (2005) Fishing for contracts. Credit Union Management, 28 pp 18-20.
Sweeney, B. and O‘Reilly, J. (2001) Law in commerce.Butterworths, Sydney.
Vinten, G. (1998) Corporate governance: An international state of the art. Managerial Auditing Journal, 13. Available at www.proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au.
Weigelt, M. (2007) Ethics emphasis could be a procurement plus. Federal Computer Week, 21 p 58.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.