SEARCHING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE - DECENTRALISED GOVERNANCE AND RURAL COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY

Authors

  • Diane Costello CurtinUniversityof Technology
  • Brian Bishop CurtinUniversityof Technology

Abstract

Government policies in Australia are heavily directed towards local communities developing their civil society networks to solve complex social, economic and environmental problems. In response, rural communities in Australia have mobilised around principles of sustainability to adapt towards regional self reliance. While decentralised governance is a key mechanism aimed at facilitating local empowerment and community resilience, devolution of responsibility to the local levels also enables governments to distance themselves from decision-making processes that deliver inequitable outcomes. This case study examines the impetus for community engagement and the effectiveness of social mobilisation approaches in delivering socially just outcomes. It is argued that mandatory mechanisms of accountability are vital to ensure that decentralised governance structures are inclusive and facilitate the inter- and intra- generational justice concerns of all community members.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, P.D., Horridge, M., Madden, J.R. and Wittwer, G. (2002) Drought, regions and the Australian economy between 200102 and 200405. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 28(94)pp23146.

Agyeman, J. (2002)Constructing environmental (in)justice: Transatlantic tales. Environmental Politics, 11pp 3163.

Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. andEvans, B. (2003) Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. Earthscan,Mit Press, London.

Agyeman, J. andEvans, B. (2004) ̳Just sustainability‘: The emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? The Geographical Journal, 170(2)pp15564.

Alston, M. (2000)Social capital in rural Australia. Proceedings of the International Third Sector Research Conference, Dublin.

Alston, M. (2002)Social Capital in Rural Australia. Rural Society, 12(2)pp93104.

Amin, S. (2001) Moving on: Institutionalism in economic geography.Environment and Planning, 33pp 1237–41.

Argent, N. andRolley, F. (2000) Financial exclusion in rural and remote New South Wales, Australia: Ageography of bankbranch rationalization, 19811998. Australian Geographical Studies, 38pp182203.

Bass, B.M. andAvolio, B.J. (1997) Full range leadership development:Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Mind Garden, Redwood City, CA.

Beall, J., Crankshaw, O. andParnell, S. (2000) Local government,poverty reduction and inequality in Johannesburg. Environment and Urbanization, 12(1)pp10722.

Beeson, M. and Firth, A. (1998) Neoliberalism as a political rationality: Australian public policy since the 1980s. Journal of Sociology, 34 (3) pp 21521.

Behn, R. (2001) Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

Benton, T. (1999)Sustainable development and accumulation of capital: Reconciling the irreconcilable? InDobson, A.(Ed)Fairness and Futurity.Oxford University Press, Oxford. 199229.

Berman, S. (1997) Civil society and political institutionalization. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5)pp56275.

Bi, P. andParton, K.A. (2008) Effect of climate change on Australian rural and remote regions: What do we know and what do we need to know? Australian Journal of Rural Health, 16pp24.

Bishop, B. andVicary, D. (2003) Paradoxes, parables and conundrums: A new sense of community? Network, 14pp337.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-30

How to Cite

Costello, D. . ., & Bishop, B. . (2008). SEARCHING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE - DECENTRALISED GOVERNANCE AND RURAL COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 14(1), 76–101. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/44

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2008): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2008 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.