• Jeffrey Roy Dalhousie University


This article examines how the patterns of business-government relations are changing in an increasingly networked era. The primary focus in this investigation is the widening scope of collaboration and partnerships between both sectors, and the arguments for and against such interaction. Subsequently, how these arguments relate to transparency and secrecy in the formation of new governance arrangements as well as accountability and performance of such arrangements are also considered. The essential role of transparency is put forth as the key to being able to distinguish between collaboration and collusion and to promote the former as a basis of more virtuous hybrid governance models enjoining business and government.


Accenture Consulting (2007) Leadership in Customer Service -Delivering on the Promise (

AccountAbility(2005) TowardsResponsibility Lobbying: Leadership and Public Policy. The Global Compact, London.

Agranoff, R. (2003) Leveraging Networks: A Guide for Public Managers Working across Organizations. IBM Center for the Business of Government,Washington, DC.

Andreescu, F. (2003) Post New Public Management Models? New Templates and Possible Lessons from a Commercialising British Public Sector Organization.University of Southampton, Southampton.

Barton, A. (2006) Public sector accountability and commercial-in-confidence outsourcing contracts.Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,19 (2)pp256-71.

Brous, P.A. andDatar, V. (2007) The value oftransparency: Evidence from voluntarily recognizing the expense associated with employee stock options. Business and Society Review,112 (2) pp 251-69.

Bullock, G. (2006) Governance, Accountability and Legitimacy: A Case Study of Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings. Consumer Information Laboratory, University of California, Berkley, CA.

Courchene, T.J. (2005) 'E-the-people': Reflections on citizen power in the information age. Policy Options,26 (3) pp 43-50.

Dubbink, W. (2007) Transparency gained, morality lost. Business and Society Review,112 (2)pp287-313.

Dixon, T.,Pottinger, G. and Jordan, A. (2005) Lessons from the private finance initiative in the UK: Benefits, problems and critical success factors.Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23(5)pp 412-23.

Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J.andRoy, J. (2007) Re-imagining the service recipient: Customers, clients and citizens in the emerging world of e-government. Journal of Information Technology and Politics,1 (1) pp 77-90.

Dwyer, P. (2004) The rise of transparency networks: Anew dynamic for inclusive government. In Halligan, J. and Moore, T. (Eds)Future Challenges for e-Government.Government of Australia, Canberra.114-27.

Economist Intelligence Unit (2006) Foresight 2020 -Economic, industry and corporate trends (Chapter two: Public Sector). Economist Intelligence Unit, London.

Edelman (2005) Edelman Annual Trust Barometer. Edelman Corporation (

Eggers, W. (2005) Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce Gridlock and Enhance Democracy. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, New York, NY.

Entwistle, T. and Martin, S. (2005) From competition to collaboration in public service delivery: A new agenda for research. Public Administration,83 (1)pp233-42.

Fukuyama, F. (2004) State-building: Governance and World Order in the 21stCentury. Cornell University Press,Ithaca, NY.

Gold, D. and Dienhart, J.W. (2007) Business ethics in the corporate governance era. Business and Society Review,112 (2) pp 163-70.

Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W.D. (2004) Governing by Networks -theNew Shape of the Public Sector. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC




How to Cite

Roy, J. . (2007). TRANSPARENCY OR SECRECY? BUSINESS-GOVERNMENT RELATIONS IN A NETWORKED ERA. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 13(2), 30–46. Retrieved from