RESEARCH ON THE LINKAGE OF DIGITAL MONEY MARKET: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS BASED ON GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST AND VARIANCE DECOMPOSITION

Authors

  • Fateh Saci University of Mayotte, CHROME Research Center (EA 7352)

Keywords:

Digital Currency (Cryptocurrency), Bitcoin, Blockchain, Co-movement

Abstract

Based on the close price data of the main nine currency pairs in the digital money market in the period between 2018 and 2020, the linkage relationship between the nine currency pairs' price changes has been empirically studied. The impact of BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT on the volatility of other currencies is analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient, Granger causality test and variance decomposition. The results show that the price change of BTCUSDT is the reason for the price change of all other currencies. The fluctuation change of BTCUSDT can be explained by its own fluctuation. The fluctuation of other currencies has little contribution on the fluctuation of BTCUSDT. Among the contributions made on the overall market volatility, BTC's impact on market volatility is higher than ETH's impact on market volatility. XRP volatility can be explained by its own volatility, and its currency trend is quite different from that of other currencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abhay A. 1998. "Linear and nonlinear Granger causality: Evidence from the U.K. stock index futures market." Journal of Futures Markets 18(5): 519-540. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199808)18:5<519::AID-FUT2>3.0.CO;2-U

Corelli, A. 2018. "Cryptocurrencies and Exchange Rates: A Relationship and Causality Analysis." Risks 6, no. 4: 1-111. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6040111

Baur, D. G., T. Dimpfl, and L. Kuck. 2018. "Bitcoin, gold and the US dollar – A replication and extension." Finance Research Letters 25 (C): 103-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2017.10.012

Baur, D. G., K. Hong, and A. D. Lee. 2018. "Bitcoin: medium of exchange or speculative assets?" Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 54 (C): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004

Bouri, E., M. Das, R. Gupta, and D. Roubaud. 2018. "Spillovers between Bitcoin and Other Assets during Bear and Bull Markets." Applied Economics 50 (55): 5935–5949. doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1488075.

Bayramoğlu A.T., and Ç. Başarır. 2019. The Linkage Between Cryptocurrencies and Macro-Financial Parameters: A Data Mining Approach. In: Hacioglu U. (eds) Blockchain Economics and Financial Market Innovation. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25275-5_13

Blau, B. M. 2017. "Price dynamics and speculative trading in bitcoin." Research in International Business and Finance. 41(C) : 493–499. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.05.010

Beneki, C., A, Koulis, N. A. Kyriazis, and S. Papadamou. 2019. "Investigating volatility transmission and hedging properties between Bitcoin and Ethereum." Research in International Business and Finance 48(C) : 219-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.01.001

Bouri, E., P. Molnár, G. Azzi, and D. Roubaud. 2017. On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier?" Finance Research Letters 20 (C):192-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.025

Chan, W.H., and M. Le. 2018. "Holding Bitcoin longer: The dynamic hedging abilities of Bitcoin." The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 71 (C): 107-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2018.07.004

Ciaian, P., M. Rajcaniova, and Kancs, d'Artis. 2018. "Virtual relationships: Short- and long-run evidence from BitCoin and altcoin markets." Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 52(C): 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.11.001

Corbet, S., A. Meegan, C. Larkin, B. Lucey, and L. Yarovaya. 2018. "Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets." Economics Letters 165 (C) : 28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.004

Davis, R. A., Zang, P., & Zheng, T. (2016). "Sparse vector autoregressive modeling." Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 25(4): 1077-1096. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2015.1092978

Dyhrberg, A. H. 2016. "Hedging capabilities of bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold?" Finance Research Letters 16 (C) : 139-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.025

Dyhrberg, A. H. 2016. "Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A GARCH volatility analysis." Finance Research Letters 16(C): 85-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.10.008

Edmister, R. O. (1972). "An empirical test of financial ratio analysis for small business failure prediction." Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 7(2): 1477-1493. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329929

Efthymia, S., and J. Konstantinos. 2019. "The economic value of Bitcoin: A portfolio analysis of currencies, gold, oil and stocks." Research in International Business and Finance 48 (C) : 97-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.12.001

Ghabri, Y., K. Guesmi, and A. Zantour. 2021. "Bitcoin and liquidity risk diversification." Finance Research Letters, 40(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101679

Harvey, C. R., & Siddique, A. (2000). "Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests." The Journal of finance, 55(3): 1263-1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00247

Hayes, A. S. (2017). "Cryptocurrency value formation: An empirical study leading to a cost of production model for valuing bitcoin." Telematics and informatics, 34(7): 1308-1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.005

Hogan, S., Jarrow, R., Teo, M., & Warachka, M. (2004). "Testing market efficiency using statistical arbitrage with applications to momentum and value strategies." Journal of Financial economics, 73(3): 525-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.10.004

Hui, L., and C. Zhang. 2018. "Research on the relationship between RMB and domestic interest rates in china and foreign countries-an empirical analysis based on the mainland and hong kong interbank market." Commercial Research 74-83. In Chinese

Jiang, S., Zhou, J., & Qiu, S. (2023). "Is there any correlation between digital currency price fluctuation? Based on the DCC-GARCH and wavelet coherence analysis." Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2): 2134901. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2134901

Katsiampa, P. 2019. "Volatility co-movement between Bitcoin and Ether." Finance Research Letters 30 (C) : 221-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.10.005

Katsiampa, P., S. Corbet, and B. Lucey. 2019. "Volatility spillover effects in leading cryptocurrencies: A BEKK-MGARCH analysis." Finance Research Letters 29 (C) : 68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.009

Kyriazis, N. A. 2020. "Is Bitcoin Similar to Gold? An Integrated Overview of Empirical Findings." Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13 (5): 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13050088

Li, X., and C. A. Wang. 2017. "The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: The case of Bitcoin." Decision Support Systems 95 : 49-60. DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2016.12.001

Masiak, C., J. H. Block, T. Masiak, M. Neuenkirch, and K. N. Pielen. 2020. "Initial coin offerings (ICOs): market cycles and relationship with bitcoin and ether." Small Business Economics, 55(4), 1113-1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00176-3

Nadarajah, S. and J. Chu. 2017. "On the inefficiency of Bitcoin." Economics Letters 150(C): 6-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.033

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized business review. https://assets.pubpub.org/d8wct41f/31611263538139.pdf

Nikolaos, A., and C. Ioannis. 2019. "Cryptocurrency market contagion: Market uncertainty, market complexity, and dynamic portfolios." Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 61 (C): 37-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2019.02.003

Patel, R., Goodell, J. W., Oriani, M. E., Paltrinieri, A. and Yarovaya, L. (2022). "A bibliometric review of financial market integration literature." International Review of Financial Analysis, 80: 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102035

Prasad, E. S. (2021). The future of money: How the digital revolution is transforming currencies and finance. Harvard University Press.

Ragin, C. C. (1998). "The logic of qualitative comparative analysis." International review of social history, 43(S6): 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000115111

Raza, S. A., Ahmed, M., & Aloui, C. (2022). "On the asymmetrical connectedness between cryptocurrencies and foreign exchange markets: Evidence from the nonparametric quantile on quantile approach." Research in International Business and Finance, 61: 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101627

Rock, G. 2018. "Ripple has skyrocketed, will “encryption credit” be industrialized?" Chinese and Foreign Management 22. In Chinese

Sensoy, A., T. C. Silva, S. Corbet, and B. M. Tabak. 2021. "High-frequency return and volatility spillovers among cryptocurrencies." Applied Economics 53 (37): 4310-4328. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1899119

Sifat, I., M. Azhar and M. Shariff. 2019. "Lead-Lag relationship between Bitcoin and Ethereum: Evidence from hourly and daily data." Research in International Business and Finance 50 (5): 306-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.012

Stosic, D., D. Stosic, T. B. Ludermir, and T. Stosic. 2018. "Collective behavior of cryptocurrency price changes." Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 507 (C): 499-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.050

Urquhart, A. 2017. "Price clustering in Bitcoin." Economics Letters 159(C) : 145-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.035

Urquhart, A. 2016. "The inefficiency of Bitcoin." Economics Letters 148(C): 80-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019

Wan, S., Li, M., Liu, G., & Wang, C. (2020). "Recent advances in consensus protocols for blockchain: a survey." Wireless networks, 26: 5579-5593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02195-0

Wenjuan, S., and B. Jinghai. 2017. "Financial and entity risk measurement and linkage analysis." Economic Issues Exploration 121-128. In Chinese

Yhlas, S. 2018. "Factors Influencing Cryptocurrency Prices: Evidence from Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dash, Litcoin, and Monero." Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, Tripal Publishing House, 2 (2) :1-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1991/jefa.v2i2.a16

Yishan, Z., and D. Yuwei. 2018. "The linkage between interbank bond market and interest rate swap market-an empirical study based on dcc-midas model. System Engineering 13-21. In Chinese

Yu, J. H., Kang, J., & Park, S. (2019). "Information availability and return volatility in the bitcoin market: analyzing differences of user opinion and interest." Information Processing & Management, 56(3): 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.12.002

Zhao, G., X. Yu, and Y. Zeng, (2008). "Inflation expectation and granger causality. the journal of quantitative technical economics." 25(4): 29–39. In Chinese

Zhichao, S., and X. Zheng. 2016. "An empirical analysis of the transmission relationship between china's stock market and commodity futures market-based on the risk granger causality test." Securities Market 82-89. In Chinese

Zhiyuan, L. 2017. "Research on the causal relationship between china's stock market index and trading volume-based on linear and nonlinear granger tests." Finance & Economics 30-37. In Chinese

Downloads

Published

2024-07-26

How to Cite

Saci, F. . (2024). RESEARCH ON THE LINKAGE OF DIGITAL MONEY MARKET: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS BASED ON GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST AND VARIANCE DECOMPOSITION. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 30(3), 18–32. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2826

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 3 (2024): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Fateh SACI

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.