HANDLING OF ILLEGAL LEVIES BY THE TASK FORCE TO CLEAN UP ILLEGAL LEVIES IN INDONESIA (REVIEWED FROM THE ASPECTS OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR AND TECHNOLOGY)
Keywords:
Illegal Levies, Illegal Levy Clean Up Task Force, Planned Behavior, TechnologyAbstract
Illegal levies such as ingrained in people's daily activities, and not infrequently, illegal levies are considered something that is commonly done in Indonesia. This study discusses the handling of unlawful levies carried out by the Illegal Levy Clean Up Task Force, including effectiveness and obstacles, as well as handling solutions with a planned behavior and technology approach. This research uses a qualitativeresearch approach, where the data collection used is an interview, observation,and documentation methods which are then analyzed with interactive model data analysis techniques. The results of this study show that illegal levies continue to occur in the community due to the non-optimal enforcement caused by several obstacles such as the condition of the Illegal Levy Clean Up Task Force, which is not law enforcement, the lack of derivative rules, the establishment of an ineffective illegal levy eradication unit, the occurrence of multiple positions, and low community participation. The handling of illegal levies in terms of planned behavior aspects is carried out through socialization, rules, and an ecosystem of control functions that close space for illegal levy activities. Other things that need to be done to deal with illegal levies are establishing a whistleblowing system, strengthening witness protection, the obligation to form derivative rules, and handling illegal levies in a multilevel manner. In addition, technological aspects can also support the implementation of effective handling of illegal levies. The Illegal Levy Clean Up Task Force can establish a prevention system to accelerate coordination, mapping, and evaluation in eradicating illegal levies.
Downloads
References
Transparency International, “Corruption Perceptions Index”, Retrieved 27 April 2022
Reza Pahlevi, “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Naik 1 Poin Jadi 38 pada 2021,”https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/01/26/indeks-persepsi- korupsi-indonesi a-naik-1poin-jadi-38-pada-2021, Retrieved from 21 April 2022.
Jennifer Schoeberlein, “Corruption in ASEAN: Regional trends from the 2020 Global Corruption Barometer and country spotlights,” Transparency International Anti-Corruption Helpdesk Answer (November 2020), Page 1.
Ni Komang Laksmi Ari Widya Pramesti, et al., “Pemberantasan Pungutan Liar Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Badung,” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3 (2021), Page 57.
Firman, “Satgas Saber Pungli lakukan 60.403 OTT dan amankan Rp325 miliar,” https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2225890/satgas-saber-pungli-lakukan-60403- ott-dan-amankan-rp325-miliar#mobile-src, Retrieved from 21 April 2022.
Biro Hukum, Persidangan, dan Hubungan Kelembagaan Kemenko Polhukam RI. https://polkam.go.id/biro-persidangan-hubungan-kelembagaan/, Retrieved from 4 December 2021.
Umar Anwar, “Eradication of Wild Levels in Public Services in Bandung Class I Routine,” Journal of Correctional Issues 1 (Juni 2018), Page 1.
Kgs Chris Fither, “(Kebiasaan) Memaklumi Pungli,” https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel
/r/artikel--kebiasaan-memaklumi-pungli, Retrieved from 21 April 2022.
Nyoman Trisna Sari Indra Pratiwi dan Ni Nengah Adiyaryani, “Pemberantasan Pungutan Liar (Pungli) sebagai Bentuk Kebijakan Kriminal di Indonesia,” E- Journal Universitas Udayana, Page 11.
Icek Ajzen, Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour, 2nd Edition, (Berkshire, UK: Open University Press-Mcgraw Hill Education, 2005), Page 118.
Jacques Ellul, The Technological Bluff, transl. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1990), Page 39.
Zainal Arifin dan Adhi Setiyawan, Pengembangan Pembelajaran Aktif Dengan ICT, (Yogyakarta: Skripta Media Creative, 2012), Page 92.
Albi Anggito dan Johan Setiawan, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, (Jawa Barat: CV Jejak, 2018), Page 7.
Hikmahanto Junawa, “Penegakan Hukum dalam Kajian Law and Development: Problem dan Fundamen Bagi Solusi di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Internasional 3 (Januari2006), Page 223.
Irene Svinarky, “Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi terhadap Pungutan Liar (Pungli),” Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan 4 (2016), Page 73.
Peter Hoefnagels, The other side of crimonology, (Holand: Kluwer-Deventer, 1969), Page 57.
Hasil Wawancara Anggota Satgas Saber Pungli Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Bidang Pencegahan.
Mukhsin, “Peranan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Menerapkan Sistem Informasi Desa dalam Publikasi Informasi Desa di Era Globalisasi,” Teknokom 3 (Maret 2020), Page 8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
