INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGY AND IT’S IMPACT ON URBAN MIGRATION PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY

Authors

  • Dr. Hemalatha Ramakrishnan Associate Professor School of Business and Management Christ (Deemed to be University) Bangalore
  • Dr. Niranjan Sahoo Associate Professor Xavier Institute of Social Service (XISS) Ranchi
  • Dr Kiran Jalem Assistant Professor CNRMCC&DM, N1RDPR Hyderabad
  • Dr. Keyur kumar M Nayak Director Garware Institute of Career Education and Development Mumbai
  • Dr. Vanisree Ramanathan Associate Professor MIT World Peace University Pune
  • Dr. M. Christopher Faculty of Management Jain (deemed to be) University Jayanagar Bengaluru.

Keywords:

Technology, information, reception, perception

Abstract

Innovative technology creates new ways that have developed integrity and complexity. In the current scenario with active drive, the Fourth Industrial Revolution builds on the Digital Revolution, representing new ways in which technology becomes embedded in decision making. With new waves, sustainable economic development needs to be relooked. Where does India stand, in its development of human capital? Has skill development grown with technology, if not, is there any scares to Indian sustainable growth with human capital. Technology and globalization are significantly changing work. Has technology boosted productivity? Should Techeconomics use information economics blend for productive sustainable goals? To investigate these issues firstly, stages in the technology revolution is looked upon to recall shocks. Trends in urban population, migration stock, is analyzed and thirdly, technology facilitators, labor force, devices, and broadband subscriptions are analyzed. Also, India's export of services relating to information and communication is taken into account. Does theory indicate technology has expanded production capacity, however, traditional economic theory and law do they hold relevance today with static technology assumption? Various production laws have developed theory assumptions with absolute static technology. With progress in technology. Indian urban population, in its, technology innovation has acknowledged as passive adapters and an attempt to find and explore innovation is of little attempt. The paper would like to find, if there are very few able-bodied minds that have impacted productive capacity while rest are passive adapters. Penetration has raised scope for the export market, rather a perception is sliding due to indifference and trade-off mindset of the labor force.

 

References

Black, S. E. (1997). International R& D Spillovers Human Capital and Productivity in OECD Economies An Empirical Investigation. European Economic Review, 1479-88.

Black, S. E. (2001). ow to compare Te Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 434-445.

Buckup, S. (2016). Technology and productivity. New York: World Economic Forum.

Litchenberg, F. (1998). Computer use and productivity growth in Federal government agencies. JINDE, 257-445.

Lync, B. S. (2001). How to compete for The impact of workplace Practices and Information Technology. Review of Economics and Statistics, 434-445.

Metcalfe, J. S. (2010). Technology and Economic Theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 153-171.

Ray, S. (2001). The Changing role of technological factors in explaining efficiency in Indian Firms. Development Journal, 1-30.

Schwab, K. (2016). Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: World Economic Forum.

Steven Globerman. (2000). Linkages between Technological cane and productivity growth. Western Washington, (pp. 3-17). Washington.

Storper, S. A. (1992). Industrialization and regional development in pathways to industrialization and regional development. Routledge, (pp. 3-17). London.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Ramakrishnan, D. H. ., Sahoo, D. N. ., Jalem, D. K. ., M Nayak, D. K. kumar, Ramanathan, D. V. ., & Dr. M. Christopher. (2022). INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGY AND IT’S IMPACT ON URBAN MIGRATION PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 28(4), 197–212. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2446