PERFORMANCE OF ESG INDEX: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF S&P BSE 100 ESG INDEX WITH SELECTED BSE STOCK INDEXES

Authors

  • Dr. Amruthavarshini. V Assistant Professor and Research Guide, P.E.S College of Science, Arts and Commerce College, Mandya-571401
  • Harsha. B Assistant Professor and Research Scholar, Govt. First Grade College, Hunasagi,Yadgir-585215

Keywords:

ESG, S&P BSE 100 ESG Index, Market Portfolio, Stock Indexes, Performance evaluation, socially responsible investing

Abstract

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) are the three central factors in measuring sustainability of an investment. Investors are increasingly applying these non-financial factors as a part of their analysis process to identify material risks and growth opportunities. Therefore, there is a need to study the performance of ESG stocks for better investment decisions. The objective of the paper is to empirically examine the performance of S&P BSE 100 ESG Index with other selected BSE stock indexes. For the study, Daily and monthly adjusted closing prices of respective index during the period from 1st Jan 2018 to 31st Dec 2021 have been collected from BSE and Yahoo finance.. Then index prices have been converted into simple percentage returns. The risk-free rate is calculated as the daily average implicit yield on 364 days treasury bills over the study period. Next Karl Pearson’s Co-efficient of correlation is used to study the relationship among these portfolios. For the performance evaluation, portfolio beta and risk adjusted measures like Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio and Jensen measure have been used. T-test is used to check whether the mean returns of the portfolios are significantly different or not. The study reveals that Performance of the ESG stock portfolio has outperformed when compared to Blue chip and Large cap stock portfolio as the Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen ratios are highest compare to rest of the portfolios. It is found that daily returns of the ESG stock portfolio are consistent with the monthly returns. During this study period, ESG stocks have performed better and there is no significant difference among the portfolios in terms of daily returns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mandal, R., & Murthy, A. (2021). CSR in the post pandemic era: the dual promise of ESG investment and investor stewardship. Indian Law Review, 1-21.

Bruno, G., Esakia, M., & Goltz, F. (2022). “ Honey, I Shrunk the ESG Alpha”: RiskAdjusting ESG Portfolio Returns. The Journal of Investing.

Maiti, M. (2021). Is ESG the succeeding risk factor? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(3 ), 199-213.

Freiberg, D., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2020). How ESG Issues Become Financially Material to Corporations and Their Investors. Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, (20-056).

Nugent, T., Stelea, N., & Leidner, J. L. (2020). Detecting ESG topics using domainspecific language models and data augmentation approaches. arXiv preprint

arXiv:2010.08319.

Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., & ElAlfy, A. (2020). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19

pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-7.

Cardenas, M. A. U. R. I. C. I. O., Ayala, J. J. G., & Hernandez-Aguilera, J. H. (2020). Boosting ESG finance for the Post-COVID19 world. Commentary. Center on Global

Energy Policy.

Ayesha, S., & Prakasam, K. (2021). ESG investing factors and constituents-A tool for socially responsible investment in a rising populism environment. EFFLATOUNIAMultidisciplinaiy Journal, 5(3), 74-82.

Jasuja, D., Prosad, J. M., & Nautiyal, N. (2021). A Comparative Performance Analysis of Sustainability Themed Indices in India: Markov Regime Switching

Approach. FIIB Business Review, 23197145211052805.

Kumar, D. (2019). Fooling Actively: Factor Exposure Analysis of Active ESG Managers. Available at SSRN 3428358.

Balasubramanian, A. M. D. P. (2019). A Study on Relationship between Corporate Financial Performance and Environmental Social & Governance Score (ESG

Score). FIFI-2019.

Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power

generation companies. Sustainability, 10( 8), 2607.

Martins, H. C. (2021). Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model. Finance Research Letters, 102371.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

V, D. A., & B, H. . (2022). PERFORMANCE OF ESG INDEX: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF S&P BSE 100 ESG INDEX WITH SELECTED BSE STOCK INDEXES. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 28(3), 604–611. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2397

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.