• Inderpal Singh Curtin University of Technology
  • J-L W Mitchell Van der Zahn Curtin University of Technology


Using an information economics framework and a 47-item disclosure index, two determinants (proceeds from share issue and trading volume of shares during the fiscal year) of social and environmental disclosure of 53 Australian and 48 Canadian oil and gas firms were empirically examined. Results indicated that only one information cost proxy (proceeds from share issue) is a significant determinant of the extent of social and environmental disclosure amongst the sample. However, the directional sign of proceeds from share issue was contrary to expectations. Results indicate that firm size is the dominant factor determining the extent of social and environmental disclosure practices in the oil and gas industry. Whilst the empirical findings may not provide overwhelming support for the predicted outcomes, the study is a starting point for exploring alternative theoretical models to explain the type and extent of social and environmental disclosure.


Akerlof, G. (1970) The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89(August) pp 488-500.

Atiase, R. (1985) Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behaviour around earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(Spring) pp 21-36.

Barry, C.B. and Brown, S. J. (1985) Differential information and security market equilibrium. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 pp 407-422.

Botosan, C.A. (1997) Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72 (3) pp 323-350.

Cooke, T.E. (1989) Voluntary disclosure by Swedish companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 1 (2) pp 171-195.

Cormier, D. and Magnan, M. (1999) Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 14(4) pp 429-451.

Cormier, D. and Magnan, M. (2002) Performance reporting by oil and gas firms: Contractual and value implications. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, 11 (2) pp 131-153.

Cormier, D. and Magnan, M. (2003) Environmental reporting management: A continental European perspective. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 22 (1) pp 43-62.

Cormier, D., Magnan, M. and Van Velthoven, B. (2005) Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14 (1) pp 3-39.

Darrough, M. and Stoughton, N. (1990) Financial disclosure policy in an entry game. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12 pp 219-244.

Foster, G. (1986) Financial Statement Analysis(2nd Ed). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Frankel, R., McNichols, M. and Wilson, G.P. (1995) Discretionary disclosure and external financing. The Accounting Review, 70 (1) pp 135-150.

Gibbins, M., Richardson, A. and Waterhouse, J. (1990) The management of corporate financial disclosure: opportunism, ritualism, policies and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28 (1) pp 121-143.

Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995) Corporate social and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8 (1) pp 44-77




How to Cite

Singh, I. . ., & Zahn, J.-L. W. M. V. der . (2007). SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF AUSTRALIAN AND CANADIAN OIL AND GAS FIRMS: AN INFORMATION COSTS PERSPECTIVE. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 13(1), 57–75. Retrieved from