Performance Appraisal Purpose and Job Embeddedness: Examining the Interaction Effect of Multidimensional Locus of Control
Keywords:
Developmental performance appraisal, Evaluative performance appraisal, Job embeddedness, Internal locus of control, External locus of control.Abstract
Using Social exchange theory, this study aimed to examine whether the developmental and evaluative purpose of performance appraisal significantly predicts job embeddedness and the interaction effect of internal and external locus of control. Data were gathered from salespersons of the pharmaceutical industry working in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. A sample of 304 respondents using a cross-sectional survey was drawn for final analysis using non-probability sampling technique. Measurement and structural model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings revealed that both developmental performance appraisal and evaluative performance appraisal significantly and positively influence job embeddedness. Results also indicate that internal and external locus of control significantly moderates the relationship between developmental and evaluative performance appraisal with job embeddedness. These findings provide important insights in understanding the dimensions of performance appraisal for predicting workplace outcome. The study has theoretically contributed to the existing literature by examining the boundary condition of internal and external locus of control. Finally, recommendations for managers and future research directions have been documented at the end of the study.
Downloads
References
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514-
Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
Aube, C., Rousseau, V., & Morin, E. M. (2007). Perceived organizational support and organizational commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(5), 479-495.
Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283-299.
Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2002). Separating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(3), 391-412.
Buch, R., Kuvaas, B., Dysvik, A., & Schyns, B. (2014). If and when social and economic leader member exchange relationships predict follower work effort: The moderating role of
work motivation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(8), 725-739.
Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied psychological measurement, 12(4), 425-434.
Cravens, K. S., Oliver, E. G., Oishi, S., & Stewart, J. S. (2015). Workplace culture mediates performance appraisal effectiveness and employee outcomes: A study in a retail setting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(2), 1-34.
Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M., & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031-1042.
Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social
Psychology, 52(3), 412-430.
Dysvik, A., Kuvaas, B., & Buch, R. (2014). Perceived training intensity and work effort: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(5), 729-738.
Eyoun, K., Chen, H., Ayoun, B., & Khliefat, A. (2020). The relationship between purpose of performance appraisal and psychological contract: Generational differences as a moderator. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86(2020), 102449-102457.
Grubb, T. (2007). Performance appraisal reappraised: it's not all positive. Journal of Human Resources Education, 1(1), 1-22.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE, Los Angeles, CA.
Hamwi, A., Rutherford, B. N., Boles, J. S., & Madupalli, R. K. (2014). Understanding effects of salesperson locus of control. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(1), 1-10.
Harman, D. (1967). A single factor test of common method variance. Journal of Psychology, 35(1967), 359-378.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Ho, H., & Kuvaas, B. (2020). Human resource management systems, employee well‐ being, and firm performance from the mutual gains and critical perspectives: The well‐ being paradox. Human Resource Management, 59(3), 235-253.
Iqbal, M. Z., Akbar, S., Budhwar, P., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2019). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: Evidence on the utilization criteria. Journal of Business Research, 101, 285- 299.
Ismail, H. N., & Gali, N. (2017). Relationships among performance appraisal satisfaction, work family conflict and job stress. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(3), 356-372.
Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 80-105.
Kakkar, S., Dash, S., Vohra, N., & Saha, S. (2020). Engaging employees through effective performance management: an empirical examination. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 27(5), 1843-1860.
Kampkötter, P. (2017). Performance appraisals and job satisfaction. The International Journal of HumanResource Management, 28(5), 750-774.
Kim, T., & Holzer, M. (2016). Public employees and performance appraisal: A study of antecedents to employees’ perception of the process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 31-56.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10.
Kuvaas, B. (2006). Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3), 504–522.
Kuvaas, B. (2008). An exploration of how the employee–organization relationship affects the linkagebetween perception of developmental human resource practices and employee outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 1-25.
Lu, H., Yue, A., Han, Y., & Chen, H. (2018). Exploring the effect of different performance appraisal purposes on miners’ organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating role of organization identification. Sustainability, 10(11), 4254-4254.
Mackey, K. A., & Johnson, G. (1999). The strategic management of human resources in New Zealand. McGraw-Hill Book Company New Zealand.
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Mirza, M. Z., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., & Ahmad, M. S. (2019). Performance appraisal satisfaction and turnover intention: The mediating role of work engagement. Management Decision, 58(6), 1053-1066.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
Mullins, L.J. (2002). Management and Organisational Behaviour, 5th Ed, London, Financial times Pitman Publishing.
Naeem, M., Jamal, W., & Riaz, M. K. (2017). The relationship of employees' performance appraisal satisfaction with employees' outcomes: evidence from higher educational institutes. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 71-81.
Nurse, L. (2005). Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: exploring the linkages. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7), 1176–1194.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journalof Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Poon, M.L. (2004). Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Personnel Review, 33(3), 322-334.
Qiu, M., Hu, B., Xu, Z., & Li, Y. (2015). Employees' psychological ownership and self-efficacy as mediators between performance appraisal purpose and proactive behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(7), 1101-1109.
Razzaghian, M., & Shah, A. (2018). An Assessment of the Predictors and Consequences of Workaholism using Hierarchical Models. Business & Economic Review, 10(4), 1-26.
Richter, N.F., Sinkovics, R.R., Ringle, C.M. & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376-404. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice- Hall.
Schmitz, N., Neumann, W., & Oppermann, R. (2000). Stress, burnout and locus of control in German nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 37(2), 95-99.
Scott, J. (2009). Performance appraisals that actually improvement performance. Career and technical education, 5(1), 22-25.
Sharma, A., & Sharma, T. (2017). HR analytics and performance appraisal system: A conceptual framework for employee performance improvement. Management Research Review, 40(6), 684-697.
Spector, P.E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335-340.
Spicer, D. P., & Ahmad, R. (2006). Cognitive processing models in performance appraisal: Evidence from the Malaysian education system. Human Resource Management
Journal, 16(2), 214-230.
Stivers, B. P., & Joyce, T. (2000). Building a balanced performance management system. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 65(2), 22-29.
Waheed. (2017). Pakistan’s pharmaceutical industry. Policy Research Institute of Marketing Economy.
Yang, C., Ma, Q., & Hu, L. (2011). Job embeddedness: A new perspective to predict voluntary turnover. Nankai Business Review International, 2(4), 418-446.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.