Relationship of Company Age and Industry Sector with FinancialPerformance –An Indian Evidence
Keywords:
Corporate governance, Age, Industry sector, financial performanceAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship of the age of companies and the industry sector on financial performance variables for NIFTY 100 Index companies. The minimum age of a company in NIFTY 100 index was seven years and the maximum age is114 years. Further, these companies have been divided into nine industry sectors. To analyze the relationship, sixteen financial performance variables have been taken for the financial year 2019.
It has been found that older companies have better performance in terms of return ratios, stakeholders-related ratios, leverage, replacement ratios. Younger companies have better operational efficiency and market valuation. It has also been observed that there is a significant difference in return ratios for Telecom and Utility, Financial, Industrial, Consumer staples, IT, Energy and Consumer Discretionary Sectors. The findings of this paper will enable investors in making prudent investment decisions and will enable them to understand how the age and industry of a company impact the financial performance of companies in India.
Downloads
References
• Acharya, Viral V. and Gottschalg, Oliver and Hahn, Moritz and Kehoe, Conor, Corporate Governance and Value Creation: Evidence from Private Equity (February 17, 2010). European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Finance Working Paper No. 232/2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1324016 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1324016
• Akben-Selcuk, E. (2016). Does Firm Age Affect Profitability? Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 3, 1-9.
• Akhavein, J.D., Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B. (1997), “The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: evidence from a bank profit function”, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 95-139.
• Akinyomi, O. J. &Olagunju, A. (2013). Effect of firm size on profitability: Evidence from Nigerian manufacturing sector. Prime Journals of Business Administration and Management, 3(9), 1171-1175.
• Basti, E., Bayyurt, N. & Akın, A. (2011). A comparative performance analysis of foreign and domestic manufacturing companies in Turkey. European Journal of Economic and Political Science, 4(2), 125- 137.
• Bianco, M., Bontempi, M.E., Golinelli, R. &Parigi, G. (2013). Family firms’ investments, uncertainty and opacity. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1035–1058.
• Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc‐Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. (2001), “Capital structures in developing countries”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 87-130.
• Coad, A., Segarra-Blascoand, A. &Teruel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: does firm performance improve with age?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173-189.
• Dogan, M. (2013). Does firm size affect the firm profitability? Evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 53-59.
• Esteve-Pérez, Silviano, Fabio Pieri, and Diego Rodriguez. 2018. Age and Productivity as Determinantsof Firm Survival over the Industry Life Cycle. Industry and Innovation 25: 167– 98.
• Ghafoorifard, M., Sheykh, B., Shakibaee, M. &Joshaghan, N.S. (2014). Assessing the relationship between firm size, age and financial performance in listed companies on Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Scientific Management and Development, 2(11), 631- 635.
• Gilchris, M. (2013), “Influence of bank specific and macroeconomic factors on the profitability of 25 commercial banks in Pakistan during the time period 2007-2011”, American Journal of Business and Finance, Vol. 3 No. 2.
• Gurbuz, A.O., Aybars, A. &Kutlu, O. (2010). Corporate governance and financial performance with a perspective on institutional ownership: empirical evidence from Turkey. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 8(2), 21-37.
• Hande, Karadag. 2017. The Impact of Industry, Firm Age and Education Level on Financial Management Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies 9: 300–314.
• Kipesha, E.F. (2013). Impact of size and age on firm performance: Evidences from Microfinance
Institutions in Tanzania, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(5), 105-116.
• Kogan, L. and Tian, M. (2012), “Firm characteristics and empirical factor models: a data-mining experiment”, International Finance Discussion Papers No. 1070.
• Kücher, Alexander, Stefan Mayr, Christine Mitter, Christine Duller, and Birgit FeldbauerDurstmüller. 2018. Firm Age Dynamics and Causes of Corporate Bankruptcy: Age Dependent Explanations for Business Failure. Review of Managerial Science, 0123456789.
• Lahiri, Somnath, and SaptarshiPurkayastha. 2017. Impact of Industry Sector on Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance: Evidence from Indian Business Groups. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration 34: 77– 88.
• Legesse, Guta. 2018. An Analysis of the Effects of Aging and Experience on Firms’ Performance BT—Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia. Edited by Almas Heshmati and Haeyeon Yoon.Singapore: Springer, pp. 255–76.
• Li, Yao Amber, Wei Liao, and Chen Carol Zhao. 2018. Credit Constraints and Firm Productivity: Microeconomic Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance 45: 134– 49.
• Liargovas, P. and Skandalis, K. (2008), “Factors affecting firms’ financial performance: the case of Greece”, Working Papers No. 0012, Department of Economics, University of Peloponnese.
• Loderer, C.F. &Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance, SSRN working paper. Retrieved March 01, 2018 (de indirildi) from the World Wide Web: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1342248.
• Lopez–Gracia, J. & Sanchez–Andujar, S. (2007). Financial structure of the family business: evidence from a group of small Spanish firms. Family Business Review. 20, 269-287.
• Lwango, Albert, RégisCoeurderoy, and Gabriel A. Giménez Roche. 2017. Family Influence and SME Performance under Conditions of Firm Size and Age. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 24: 629–48.
• Majumdar, Sumit K. 1997. The Impact of Size and Age on Firm-Level Performance: Some Evidence from India. Review of Industrial Organization 12: 231–41.
• Marsh, P. (1982), “The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 121-144.
• McKnight, P.J. and Weir, C. (2008), “Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: a panel data analysis”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 139-158.
• Omondi, M. M &Muturi, W. (2013). Factors affecting the financial performance of listed companies at the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(15), 99-104
• Osunsan O.K., Nowak J., Mabonga E., Pule S., Kibirige A.R. &Baliruno J.B. (2015). Firm age and performance in Kampala, Uganda: A selection of small business enterprises. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(4), 364-374.
• Owolabi, S. A. &Alu, C. N. (2012). Effective Working Capital Management and Profitability: A Study of Selected Quoted Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. Economics and Finance Review, 2(6), 55– 67.
• Owolabi, S.A. &Inyang, U. E. (2013). International pragmatic review and assessment of capital structure determinants. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(6),82-96.
• Prajogo, Daniel I. 2006. The Relationship between Innovation and Business Performance—A Comparative Study between Manufacturing and Service Firms. Knowledge and Process Management 13: 218–25.
• Rajan, R.G. and Zingales, L. (1995), “What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 1421-1460.
• Reed D (2002) Corporate governance reforms in developing countries. J Bus Ethics 37(3):223– 247
• Reed, Richard, and Susan F Storrud-Barnes. 2009. Systematic Performance Differences across the Manufacturing-Service Continuum. Service Business 3: 319.
• Richard, P.J., Devinney, T.M., Yip, G.S. and Johnson, G. (2009), “Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice”, Journal of Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 718- 804.
• Seo, Yong Won, Youn Sung Kim, DaeSoo Kim, Yung-Mok Yu, and Sung Hee Lee. 2016. Innovation Patterns of Manufacturing and Service Firms in Korea. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 27: 718–34.
• Smirlock, M. (1985), “Evidence on the (non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 69-83. S
• Subrahmanyam, A. and Titman, S. (2001), “Feedback from stock prices to cash flows”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 56 No. 18, pp. 2389-2413.
• Wald, J.K. (1999), “How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 161-187.
• Walker, D. (2001), “Exploring the human capital contribution to productivity, profitability and themarket evaluation of the firm”, available at: wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations World Bank Group (2015),“Kenya economic update”, available at: www- wds.worldbank.org/external/ default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2015/10/14/090224b08314473e/1_0/Rendered/PDF/ Kenya0economic0public0participation.pdf (accessed 15, June 2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
