CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, DIVIDEND POLICY AND NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONERS
Keywords:
CSR; Dividend Policy; Number of Independent Commissioners.Abstract
Dividend policy of a company is an important information for shareholders and prospective shareholders. Dividends distributed by the company is a positive signal, because the company is considered profitable in its business. Dividend policy taken is influenced by CSR. CSR programs have a positive influence on the company but these activities can cause agency problems between company managers and shareholders. With the emergence of agency problems, companies must look for outsiders to help reduce agency problems, namely the emergence of independent commissioners in the organizational structure. The independent commissioner functions to provide advice and control the activities of the company manager.
This study aims to examine and analyze the relationship between corporate CSR with dividend policy taken by the company, later the relationship of CSR with dividend policy is moderated by the percentage of the number of independent commissioners. The sample used is non-financial companies listed on the Stock Exchange in the 2015-2019 period. The method used was purposive sampling involving 235 observations. Research analysis techniques are multiple linear regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis with moderation. The results of this study are that there is no significant relationship between corporate CSR with dividend policy, then the percentage of the number of independent commissioners cannot strengthen the relationship between CSR and dividend policy, but the percentage of the number of independent commissioners has a significant negative effect on dividend policy. In this study also found that the size and growth of the company does not affect dividend policy. Then for leverage and profitability the company has a significant positive relationship to the company's dividend policy.
Downloads
References
Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia.Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance.
Banyi, M. L. and Kahle, K. M. 2014. Declining propensity to pay? A re-examination of the lifecycle theory. Journal of Corporate Finance. Vol.27, pp.345-366.
Barnea, A., Rubin, A., 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders.
J. Bus. Ethics 97, 71–86.
Benlemlih, M., 2019. Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy. Research in International Business and Finance (47), 114–138.
Brown, W.O., Helland, E., Smith, J.K., 2006. Corporate philanthropic practices. J. Corp. Financ.
(5), 855–877.
Cespa, G., Cestone, G., 2007. Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 16 (3), 741–771.
Denis, Diane K., and John J. Mc Connel. 2003. International Corporate Governance. ECGI Working Paper.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review. Vol 14, No.1
Forum for Corporate Governance in Indonesia. 2001. Corporate Governance Seri Tata Kelola Perusahaan. Volume 1. 4th Edition. Jakarta.
Ghozali, Imam. 2018. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Godfrey, P.C., 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30 (4), 777–798.
Grullon, G., Michaely, R. and Swaminathan, B. 2002. Are dividend changes a sign of firm maturity?The journal of Business, Vol.75, No.3, pp.387-424.
Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No.4.
Jensen, M., 1986. Agency costs of free-cash flow, corporate finance and the market for takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 76, 323–329.
Rakotomavo, M.T.J. 2012. Corporate investment in social responsibility versus dividends?
Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 199-207.
Samet Marwa, Marwa Samet, JarbouiAnis, Anis Jarboui. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and payout decisions. Managerial Finance 43:9, 982-998.
Sudana, I Made. 2015. Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Erlangga. Susetiawan. 2012. CSR: Kommitmen untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta:
Azzagrafika.
Suwardjono. 2014. Teori Akuntansi Perekayasaan Pelaporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Trihermanto, Febi and Yunieta Anny Nainggolan. 2019. Corporate life cycle, CSR, and dividend policy: empirical evidence of Indonesian listed firms. Social Responsibility Journal.
UU No 32 th 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas no 40 tahun 2007
Ye, K., Zhang, R., 2011. Do lenders value corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China.
J
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
