Comparative Analysis of proposed Multilateral Investment Court and Permanent Multilateral Appellate Mechanism: Dilemma, Value, and Best Path Choice

Authors

  • Muhammad Abid Hussain Shah Jillani
  • Amjad Hussain
  • Shahzada Aamir Mushtaq

Keywords:

Investor-State, Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Appellate Mechanism, Multilateral Appellate Body, Multilateral Investment Court, New York Convention, ICSID Convention. Trade Law, Economic Law.

Abstract

The present study finds that establishing a permanent appeals mechanism is essential to resolve the current legitimacy crisis regarding investor-State dispute settlement. Currently, States have proposed two basic models of investment arbitration appellate reform to Working Group III of the UN Commission on International Trade Law, namely the formation of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) and a Permanent Multilateral Appellate Process(PMAP). The Latter is more legitimate and feasible than the MIC. The Appellate Mechanism's (AM) review scope should include legal and procedural errors to guarantee that the AM's error rectification function is completely accomplished. To improve the efficiency of arbitration, factual inaccuracies should be confined to apparent errors. Although stare decisis is not yet a general concept in international arbitration, PMAP can employ the de facto stare decisis evolved in WTO judicial practice to promote coherence and predictability of verdicts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

Jillani, M. A. H. S. ., Hussain, A. ., & Mushtaq, S. A. . (2021). Comparative Analysis of proposed Multilateral Investment Court and Permanent Multilateral Appellate Mechanism: Dilemma, Value, and Best Path Choice. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(5), 2853–2869. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2156

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 5 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.