A PERSPECTIVE ON THE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES SPECIFIC TO ORGANIC FARMING
Keywords:
organic food, challenges, opportunities, consumers, Romanian organic food market, control bodies.Abstract
The evolution of society has attracted positive changes in all fields of activity, implicitly in agriculture, but at the same time the increase in productivity in agriculture has also come with negative consequences, as they have significantly increased the use of fuel for agricultural machinery, electricity for automatic systems. In addition to providing safe and nutritious food, organic production is considered sustainable and protects natural resources and the health of consumers.
In this context, the main objective of the research is to analyse the current state of organic food on the Romanian market compared to the European Union by taking into account the main aspects of the market, to identify its weaknesses, challenges and opportunities. For these reasons, we believe that the chosen topic is current, the research team thus assuming an active role in participating in campaigns to promote and inform consumers about the benefits of consuming organic products.
Downloads
References
Beharrell, B. and MacFie, J.H. 1991. Consumer attitudes to organic foods. British Food journal 93(2):25-30.
Bertramsen, S.K. and Dobbs, T.L. 2001. Comparison of Prices for ‘Organic’and ‘Conventional’ Grains and Soybeans în the Northern Great Plains and Upper Midwest: 1995 to 2000.
Bourn, D. and Prescott, J. 2002. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews în Food Science and Nutrition. 42(1): 1-34.
Bourn, D. and Prescott, J. 2002. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Critical Reviews în Food Science and Nutrition. 42(1): 1-34.
Davis, J.J. 1994. Consumer response to corporate environmental advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 11(2): 25-37.
Dobrescu, M, 2019. Positive Prospects for Organic Food and Agriculture in Romania, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.1-10
Economics Department, Agricultural Experiment Station, South Dakota State University.
Goldman B.J. and Clancy, K.L 1991. A survey of organic produce purchases and related attitudes of food cooperative shoppers. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 6(2): 89-96.
Goldman, M.C. and Hylton, W. 1972. The Basic Book of Organically Grown Foods. Erasmus, Pennsylvania, Rodale Press.
Gunter, G., and A. Furnham. 1992. Consumer Profiles: An Introduction to Psychographics.Routledge: London.
Halberg, N., Kristensen, I.S., 1997. Expected crop yield loss when converting to organic dairy farming în Denmark. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 14: 25-41.
Hamm, U., Gronefeld, F. And Halpin, D. 2002. Analysis of the European Market for Organic Food. Organic Market Initiatives and Rural Development: Volume 1. School of Management and Business, University of Wales, Wales.
Jolly, D.A., Schutz, G.H., Diaz-Knauf, K.V. and Johal, J. 1989. Organic foods: Consumer attitudes and use. Food Technology. November: 60-66.
Klonsky K. and Tourte, L. 1998. Organic agricultural production în the United States: Debates and directions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(5): 1119-1124.
La Via, G. and A.M.D. Nucifora. 2002. The determinants of the price mark-up for organic fruit and vegetable products în the European Union. British Food Journal. 104(3/4/5): 319-336.
Olsen, J.C.1972. 1972. Cue utilization în the quality perception process: a cognitive model and an empirical test. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Purdue University. Lafayette.
Parsons, W. 2002. Organic Fruit and Vegetable Production: Îs it for you? Catalogue no. 21-004- XIE. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
Saracin, V.C. 2015. An exploratory research regarding romanian organic farming sector, Scientific Works. Series C. Veterinary Medicine. Vol. LXI (1):260-265
+9. Torjusen, Nyberg and Wandel. 1999. Organic Food; Consumers’ Perceptions and Dietary Choices. SIFO-Report No. 5-1999. www.sifo.no/english/publications/environment
Vindigni, G., Janssen, M.A. and Jager, W. 2002. Organic food consumption: A multi-theoretical framework of consumer decision making. British Food Journal. 104(8): 624-642.
Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council from 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic and repealing Council Regulation No 834/2007
Regulation (EU) no.1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for direct payments to farmers receiving support schemes under the common agricultural policy (see Article 43)
Regulation (EU) no. 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of the on support for rural development through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (in particular Article 29 thereof)
Regulation (EU) no. 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Maritime and Fisheries Policy Fund (see in particular Articles 53, 68 and 69)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.