CORRUPTION INTHE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN: PERCEPTUAL VIEWS OF DISTRICT FAISALABAD, PUNJAB, PAKISTAN
Keywords:
Corruption, corruption perception level of corruption, corruption analysis, PakistanAbstract
Corruption has become a severe problem in Pakistan and it is shaking the foundation of the country. Corruption is equally problematic to measure and quantify. Therefore a comprehensive practice is to access the perception of corruption among people. This study evaluate situation, seriousness, causes and level of corruption. This study based on descriptive survey type’s research. It also measurements the awareness of corruption among people of Faisalabad. Majority of the people have personal experience of corruption.Most of people observe that the officials of political government are not demonstrating any political from public establishments. They observe the feeble accountability machinery is the major causes of corruption in government and Private departments.
Downloads
References
Aidt, T. S. (2011). The causes of corruption. DICE Report, 9(2), 15.
Amundsen, I. (1999). Political corruption: An introduction to the issues. Chr. Michelsen Institute. Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review.Statistical science, 235-249.
Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: a review of issues. Journal of economic literature, 35(3), 1320- 1346.
Begovic, B. (2005). Corruption: concepts, types, causes and consequences. Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies, Year III No, 26.
Bayley, D. H. (1966). The effects of corruption in a developing nation. The Western Political Quarterly, 19(4), 719- 732.
Bayar, G. (2011). Causes of corruption: dynamic panel data analysis of some post Soviet countries and East Asian countries. Journal of Applied Business Research, 27(1), 77.
Cohn, B. S. (1996). Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: The British in India. Princeton University Press.
Crowe, H. (2011). The Impact of Political Corruption on Social Welfare in the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida).
Frøystad, M. (2007). Developmental effects of corruption.
Graycar, A. (2015). Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society, 34(2), 87-96.
Haider, A., ud Din, M., & Ghani, E. (2011). Consequences of political instability, governance and bureaucratic corruption on inflation and growth: The case of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 773-807.
Huberts, L. W. (1998). What can be done against public corruption and fraud: expert views on strategies to protect public integrity. Crime, Law and Social Change, 29(2-3), 209-224.
Javaid, U. (2010). Corruption and its deep impact on good governance in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 123-134.
Langseth, P. (1999). Prevention: An effective tool to reduce corruption. United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, Centre for International Crime Prevention.
Mashal, A. M. (2011). Corruption and Resource Allocation Distortion for “ESCWA” Countries. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1, 71-
Rehman, H. U., & Naveed, A. (2007). Determinants of corruption and its relation to GDP (A panel study). Journal of Political Studies, 12(2), 27-59.
Shah, A., & Schacter, M. (2004). Combating corruption: look before you leap. Finance and Development, 41(4), 40- 43.
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study.Journal of public economics, 76(3), 399-457.
Trajtenberg, M., Shiff, G., & Melamed, R. (2006). The" names game": Harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research (No. w12479). National Bureau of Economic Research.
United Nations Ad Hoc Cmtte Against Corruption, & Austria. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption
Vargas-Hernández, J. G. (2009). The multiple faces of corruption: typology, forms and levels. Forms and Levels (October 21, 2009).
Van Vaerenbergh, Y., & Thomas, T. D. (2013). Response styles in survey research: A literature review of antecedents, consequences, and remedies.International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(2), 195-217.
Wallis, J. J. (2006). The concept of systematic corruption in American history. In Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's economic history(pp. 23-62). University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
