Performance of Microfinance Providers; Does Social Efficiency matters?

Authors

  • Maeenuddin
  • Shaari Abd Hamid
  • Annuar MD Nassir
  • Ghayasuddin

Keywords:

Efficiency, MFIs, MFPs, Social Efficiency, Poverty, Empowerment

Abstract

Microfinance sector showed a tremendous growth for the last decade and got a considerable attention throughout the entire world specifically in the developing countries, but on the other side the number of poor people has not been decreased. The focus of this study is to investigate the social efficiency of microfinance providers and to examine the different factors or problems that affecting the social efficiency of microfinance providers. Social efficiency means to how efficientlytransfer the products and services of the MFPs to the society with minimum cost. Data Envelopment Analysis approach has been proposed for the measurement of social efficiency with the total assets, total number of staff, operational expenditure as input while Average loan balance/ borrower/GNIpc. Number of female borrowers and indicator of benefit to the poorest as output variables. Regression analysis is proposed to find out the impact of different factors on the social efficiency of microfinance providers. Factors affecting the social efficiency of microfinance providers includes the presence of aggressive marketing, focus on profit oriented programs, commercialization, high level of competition, entrepreneurial behaviors of the people, different cultural dimensions, high interest rates, political instability, growth addiction, focus on stability or short term profitability, focus on loan repayment, lack of follow-up programs, lack of awareness, miss use of loan, fear of defaults, lack of technical support etc. which have to be considered in future studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alawattage, C., Graham, C., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2019). Microaccountability and biopolitics: Microfinance in a Sri Lankan village. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.008

Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). ciencv of Financial Institutions: International Survev a nd Dire ctions for Futu re Resea rch * Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Fmc iencv of Financial lnstit~ons: International Survev a nd Direction s for Future Researc h I 1. introductio. Journal of Operational Research. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/1997/199711/199711pap.pdf

Bibi, U., Balli, H. O., Matthews, C. D., & Tripe, D. W. L. (2018). Impact of gender and governance on microfinance efficiency. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 53, 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.008

Chmelíková, G., Krauss, A., & Dvouletý, O. (2018). Performance of microfinance institutions in

Europe—Does social capital matter? Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.007

Donou-Adonsou, F., & Sylwester, K. (2017). Growth effect of banks and microfinance: Evidence from developing countries. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64, 44– 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.11.001

Dorfleitner, G., Priberny, C., & Röhe, M. (2017). Why do microfinance institutions fail socially?

A global empirical examination. Finance Research Letters, 22, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.027

Dr. Muhammad Farooq, Zahoor Khan. (2014). The Social and Financial Performance of Conventional and Islamic Microfinance Institutions in Pakistan. The Social and Financial Performance of Conventional…, (June).

Efendic, V., & Hadziahmetovic, N. (2017). The social and financial efficiency of microfinance institutions: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 12(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/jeb-2017-0018

Gong, Y., Liu, J., & Zhu, J. (2019). When to increase firms’ sustainable operations for efficiency? A data envelopment analysis in the retailing industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 277(3), 1010–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.019

Goodell, J. W., Goyal, A., & Hasan, I. (2019). Comparing Financial Transparency Between For- Profit and Nonprofit Suppliers of Public Goods: Evidence from Microfinance. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, (xxxx), 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.101146

Griffin, D., & Husted, B. W. (2015). Social sanctions or social relations? Microfinance in Mexico. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2579–2587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.023

Gutierrez-Nieto, B. (2006). Working Paper Series Social Efficiency in Microfinance Institutions.

Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Mar Molinero, C. (2009). Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602527

Hartarska, V., Caudill, S. B., & Gropper, D. M. (2011). The Cost Structure of Microfinance Institutions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. SSRN Electronic Journal, (809). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.905911

Iqbal, N., Tufail, M. sajid, Mohsin, M., & Sandhu, M. A. (2019). Assessing Social and Financial

Efficiency : The Evidence from Microfinance Institutions in Pakistan Abstract : Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 39(1), 149–161.

Javid, A. Y., & Abrar, A. (2015). Microfinance institutions and poverty reduction: A cross regional analysis. Pakistan Development Review, 54(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.30541/v54i4i-iipp.371-387

Kar, A. K., & Rahman, S. (2018). Changes in total factor productivity and efficiency of microfinance institutions in the developing world: A non-parametric approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 60, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.09.012

Khan, A. A., Mustafa, F., Khursheed, A., & Siddiqui, F. (2018). Social Business Innovation :

Comparison of Operational Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions in Pakistan. 4(3), 12–20.

Louis, P., Seret, A., & Baesens, B. (2013). Financial Efficiency and Social Impact of Microfinance Institutions Using Self-Organizing Maps. World Development, 46, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.006

Mia, M. A., & Ben Soltane, B. I. (2016). Productivity and its determinants in microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from South Asian countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 51, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2016.05.003

Morduch, J. (2000). The Microfinance Schism.Princeton University ,New Jersy,USA. World Development, 28(4), 617–629.

Morduch, Jonathan, & Graduate, R. F. W. (2002). Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction Analysis of the Effects of Microfinance on Poverty Reduction.

Muhammad, S. D. (2010). Microfinance challenges and opportunities in Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 88–97.

Saad, M., Taib, H. M., & Bhuiyan, A. B. (2018). Determinants of Outreach Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Pakistan. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(15), 21–27.

Saravanan, S., & Purohit, B. C. (2019). Social Performance Of Microfinance Institutions in

South Asian Region : A Case Study of India , Bangladesh , Nepal and Sri Lanka. (March).

Widiarto, I., & Emrouznejad, A. (2015). Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions: A Data Envelopment Analysis application. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 50(2015), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2014.12.001

Wijesiri, M. (2016). Weathering the storm: Ownership structure and performance of

microfinance institutions in the wake of the global financial crisis. Economic Modelling, 57, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.011

Wijesiri, M., Viganò, L., & Meoli, M. (2015). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 47, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.016

Wijesiri, M., Yaron, J., & Meoli, M. (2017). Assessing the financial and outreach efficiency of microfinance institutions: Do age and size matter? Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 40, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2017.05.004

Downloads

Published

2021-10-30

How to Cite

Maeenuddin, Hamid, S. A. . ., Nassir, A. M. ., & Ghayasuddin. (2021). Performance of Microfinance Providers; Does Social Efficiency matters?. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(5), 1564–1573. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2078

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 5 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.