A STUDY OF SATISFACTION LEVEL AND OPINION ABOUT THE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN THE ORGANISATION

Authors

  • Kevin Rozario

Keywords:

Training, Satisfaction Level, Development Program, Organization.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to introduce a study developed in the training and staff development program and its benefits in the organisation. This study will explore the design and components of anemployee training and development program and over time the research will outline the best results for employees and the organizations. Organizations find it difficult to stay economical in the latest global economy. The significance of the human resource development program is rising in the organizations that seek to make a profit between competitors. Employees are respected organizational performance and the victory or failure of the organization extends to the performance of employees. However, organizations are investing heavily in staff training programs and development programs. In addition, the training program supports companies to put emphasis on the knowledge, expertise and skills of employees. There is a great deal of discussion between experts and researchers about the impact of that development programs on both staff and the organization. The research defined here is an in-depth examination of the literature on the critical process of human resource development and its welfares to organizations and employees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M., and Griffith, R.W. (2003). The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process. Journal of Management, 29, 1, 99–118.

Alliger GM, Tannenbaum SI, Bennett W Jr, Traver H, Shotland A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Journal of Personal Psychology, 50:341–58.

Arthur WJ, Bennett WJ, Edens P, Bell ST. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: a met-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal Applied Psychology. 88:234–45.

Barber J. (2004). Skill upgrading within informal training: lessons from the Indian auto mechanic. International Journal of Training and Development, 8:128–39.

ssBartel, A.P. (2000). Measuring the Employer’s Return on Investment in Training: Evidence from the Literature. Industrial Relations, 39, 3, 502–524.

Bartlett, K.R. (2001). The Relationship between Training and Organizational Commitment: A Study in the Health Care Field. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 4, 335–352.

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

Blundell, R., Dearden, L., Meghir, C. and Sianesi, B. (1999). Human Capital Investment: The Returns from Education and Training to the Individual, the Firm and the Economy. Fiscal Studies, 20(1): 1-23.

Blau, G. J., and Boal, K. B. (1987). Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2): 288- 300.

Bryman, A. (2007). Business Research Methods. Oxford; Oxford university press. Callahan, B. (2000, May). Life-long learning pays off. Industrial Distribution, 89 (5), 116.

Cavana, R. Y., (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. London; John Wiley.

Chaminade B (2007). A retention checklist: how do you rate?

Www.humanresourcesmagazine.co.au. Accessed, 28 November, 2007.

Colarelli, S. M., and Montei, M. S. 1996. Some contextual influences on training utilization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(3): 306-322.

Cuniff, J. (2000, July 26). Lifelong education has become the norm. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 35Q.

Dillich, S. (2000, August 4). Corporate universities. Computing Canada, 26 (16), 25. Dobbs, K. (2000, April). Tires Plus takes the training high road. Training, 37 (4), 56-63.

Feldman, D. (2000, May). The Dilbert syndrome: How employee cynicism about ineffective management is changing the nature of careers in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1286-1301.

Fenn, D. (1999, February). Corporate universities for small companies. Inc, 21 (2), 95-96.

Garger, E. M. (1999, November). Goodbye training, hello learning. Workforce, 78 (11), 35-42.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-30

How to Cite

Rozario, K. . (2021). A STUDY OF SATISFACTION LEVEL AND OPINION ABOUT THE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN THE ORGANISATION. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(4), 402–414. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/1955

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 4 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.