Multi-methods Approach for Information Management Framework in Government Control in Human Resources

Authors

  • DR. PRIYANKA NEMA

Keywords:

Gap Analysis, Government Human Capital Management, Knowledge Management, Knowledge Management Strategy, OCAI and Risk Analysis

Abstract

Knowledge management strategy roadmap consists of several stages to implement knowledge management in three government organizations that manage the process of managing the government's human capital. They are the Minister of State for State Organization Modernization (KEMENPAN & RB), National Civil Service Departments (BKN), and National Public Administration Institute (LAN). Generally speaking, this KM plan framework addresses three critical facets of human resource management by government that involve individuals, procedures, and technologies. This work explains the implementation of the KM strategy using multi-methods OCAI (Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument), evaluation of difference analysis and evaluation of risk analysis. Questionnaire and interviews are conducted to discover data relating to the government's human capital management KM strategy roadmap. The outcome of the roadmap for the KM plan was confirmed using expert judgement. Research finding the KM strategy roadmap for managing government human capital was described in three criteria and three phases. There are individuals (three phase), mechanism (three phase), technologies (two phase), and each phase has its own strategic plan of action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Shafiq, S. A. Chun, V. Atluri, J. Vaidya, and G. Nabi, “Resource sharing using UICDSTM framework for incident management,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, 2012, doi: 10.1108/17506161211214813.

L. K. Hansen and P. Kræmmergaard, “Transforming local government by project portfolio management: Identifying and overcoming control problems,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, 2013, doi: 10.1108/17506161311308160.

D. Y. Kim and G. Grant, “E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol., 2010, doi: 10.1108/13287261011070858.

I. Linkov, M. E. Bates, L. J. Canis, T. P. Seager, and J. M. Keisler, “A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.163.

F. Setiadi, Y. G. Sucahyo, and Z. A. Hasibuan, “Balanced E-Government security framework: An integrated approach to protect information and application,” in Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering and Environment, TIME-E 2013, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIME-E.2013.6611971.

J. A. Cogin, J. L. Ng, and I. Lee, “Controlling healthcare professionals: How human resource management influences job attitudes and operational efficiency,” Hum. Resour. Health, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12960-016- 0149-0.

S. D. Cannoy and A. F. Salam, “A framework for health care information assurance policy and compliance,” Commun. ACM, 2010, doi: 10.1145/1666420.1666453.

M. L. Nelson and R. Sen, “Business rules management in healthcare: A lifecycle approach,” Decis. Support Syst., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.044.

M. Al-Najem, H. Dhakal, A. Labib, and N. Bennett, “Lean readiness level within Kuwaiti manufacturing industries,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, 2013, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-05-2013-0027.

W. Sermeus et al., “Nurse forecasting in Europe (RN4CAST): Rationale, design and methodology,” BMC Nurs., 2011, doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-10-6.

S. M. Sterling, K. Garroway, Y. Guan, S. M. Ambrose, P. Horne, and G. W. Kennedy, “A new watershed assessment framework for Nova Scotia: A high-level, integrated approach for regions without a dense network of monitoring stations,” J. Hydrol., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.063.

A. Jiménez et al., “The enabling environment for participation in water and sanitation: A conceptual framework,” Water (Switzerland), 2019, doi: 10.3390/w11020308.

N. Viswanadham and A. Samvedi, “Supplier selection based on supply chain ecosystem, performance and risk criteria,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 2013, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.825056.

J. Gillespie, C. Midmore, J. Hoeflich, C. Ness, P. Ballard, and L. Stewart, “Parents as the start of the solution: A social marketing approach to understanding triggers and barriers to entering a childhood weight management service,” J. Hum. Nutr. Diet., 2015, doi: 10.1111/jhn.12237.

F. Rebaudo and O. Dangles, “An agent-based modeling framework for integrated pest management dissemination programs,” Environ. Model. Softw., 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.014.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

NEMA, D. P. . (2021). Multi-methods Approach for Information Management Framework in Government Control in Human Resources. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(3), 574–580. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/1636

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.