VALIDATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING MEASUREMENT ITEMSUSING CONTENT VALIDITY RATIO TECHNIQUE
Keywords:
Content validity,Content validity ratio, Psychological well-being, Ryff’s scales, SISC , SIPartners , Content Validity RatioAbstract
The literature has emerged that offers contradictory findings about psychological well-being but the information among education officer was limited. Until recently, there has been no reliable evidence of psychological well-being measurement using experts consensusin Malaysia. This study aims to obtainthe validity ofpsychological well-being measurement items amongSchool Improvement Specialist Coaches Plus (SISC+) and School Improvement Partner Plus (SIPartners+) officers through expert consensuswith the Content Validity Ratio or CVR methodby Lawshe (1975).This quantitative method uses a survey design through questionnaireswhilethe sampling technique includespurposive sampling,namely judgement sampling that comprisesthirteen experts inthe fields of counseling, psychology, psychometric, and language. Content validity involves fifty-four items with six dimensions adapted from Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being(1989).Overall findings recorded N=13, minimum value=0.54, and CVR=9 itemsrefined.Allpsychological well-being itemsthat have undertakencontent validitywere suggested to proposedin order to conduct a pilot studyon SISC+ and SIPartners+ officers usingthe Rasch Measurement Model.
Downloads
References
Asmawati Desa, Fatimah Yusooff, Zainah Ahmad Zamani, Nor Ba’yah Abdul Kadir & Mohd Norahim Mohamed Sani. 2015. Kemahiran keibubapaan, kefungsian keluarga dan kesejahteraan psikologi dalam kalangan ibubapa. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia 29(2): 32– 42.
Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian. 2017. Panduan Pengurusan Program Transformasi Daerah 3.0. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Barlutia, C. C., Baconschil, C. B. & Hathazi, A. 2018. Romanian adaptation of the Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale: Brief report of the factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies 18(1): 21–33.
Bartels, A. L., Peterson, S. J. & Reina, C. S. 2019. Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the eudaimonic workplace well-being scale. PLoS ONE 14(4): 1–21.
Chavez, A. C. ., Milburn, K. ., Parry, O. & Platt, S. 2005. Understanding and researching wellbeing: Its usage in different disciplines and potential for health research and health promotion. Health Education Journal 64(1): 70–87.
Clarke, P. ., Marshall, V. ., Ryff, C. . & Wheaton, B. 2001. Measuring psychological well- being in the Canadian study of health and aging. International Psychogeriatric Association 13(1): 79–90.
Elenchothy, D. & Malathi, L. 2019. School improvement specialist coach plus (SISC+) programme: Impact on teachers’ pedagogical skills and students’ performance in mathematics classroom. ASM Science Journal 12(Special Issue 1): 137–149.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A. & Alkassim, R. S. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5(1): 1–4.
Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin. 2016. Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan.
Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Henn, C. M., Hill, C. & Jorgensen, L. I. 2016. An investigation into the factor structure of the Ryff scales of psychological well-being. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 42(1).
Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. 2020. https://ikpm.jpa.gov.my/. Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam. Jr, R. C., Nguyen, T. N., Truong, Q. T., Bui, T. T. Q., Nguyen, H. M. T. & Vu, V. B. 2019.
Adapting the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-being: A 28-item Vietnamese version for university students. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 5(2): 176–197.
Kafka, G. . & Kozma, A. 2002. The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research 57(2): 171–190.
Kasapoglu, K. & Didin, M. 2019. Life skills as a predictor of psychological well-being of pre-service pre-school teachers in Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 6(1): 70–85.
Kovalenko, O. H. & Spivak, L. M. 2018. Psychological well-being of elderly people: the social factors. Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach 1(8): 163–176. doi:10.21277/sw.v1i8.323
Kumkaria, B. 2019. Emotion work as a predictor of psychological well-being in psychiatrists.
International Journal of Social Sciences Review 7(4): 755–757.
Kuruku, E. & Aloa, H. O. 2018. The impact of work-stress on the psychological well-being of social workers in a selected organization in makurdi, benue state. Ife Centre for Psychological Studies 2(2): 72–80.
Lawshe, C. . 1975. a quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28(4): 563–575.
Lindell, M. K. & Brandt, C. J. 1999. Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of the CVI, T, rWG(J), and r*WG(J) indexes. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(4): 640–647.
Lynn, M. R. 1986. Determination and quantificatiom of content validity. Nursing Research 35(6): 382–386.
Miller, L. . & Lovler, R. . 2016. Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach, hlm. 5th Edisi . California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Mohammad Izzat Akmal Shariff & Wan Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman. 2018. Penerokaan ciri- ciri psikometrik skala kesejahteraan psikologi dalam kalangan sampel malaysia. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia 32(3): 1–11.
Mohd Effendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore, Hisyamsani Idris, Normawati Abdul Rahman & Ahmad Zamri Khairani. 2017. Kesahan kandungan pakar instrumen IKBAR bagi pengukuran AQ menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan. Proseeding of International Conference On Global Education V (ICGE V), hlm. 979–997.
Mohd Yusri Ibrahim. 2017. Sembang Santai Penyelidikan. Besut: Bandar Ilmu.
Nazri Yasin, Jamiah Manap & Arena Che Kassim. 2018. Pengaruh penghargaan kendiri terhadap esejahteraan psikologi mualaf. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 13(3): 173–182.
Noraini Idris. 2013. Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan, hlm. 2nd Edisi . Selangor: McGraw Hill Education.
Nur Farhana binti Ramli, Othman bin Talib, Umi Kalthom binti Abdul Manaf & Siti Aishah
binti Hassan. 2018. Content validity of STEMTIP using CVR method. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 8(7): 1118–1125.
Powell, C. 2003. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41(4): 376–382.
Rubio, D. M., Weger, M. B., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S. & Rauch, S. 2003. Objectifyng content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research 27(2): 94–104.
Ruziati Ahamad Ariffin, Abdul Jalil Hassan, Amran Hassan, Zuraini Ismail & Ami Haji Patola. 2018. Keperluan indeks kesejahteraan psikologi dalam perkhidmatan awam: satu tinjauan umum. Jurnal Psikologi & Kaunseling Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia 13: 1–16. Ryff, C. D. 1989. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(6): 1069–
Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L. M. 1995. The structure of psychological well-being revisited.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(4): 719–727.
Salina Mokhtar & Rahimi Che Aman. 2017. Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen kesejahteraan psikologi versi Bahasa Melayu. Seminar Serantau, hlm. 27–32.
Santhanadass, A. R. 2015. Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian pendidikan luar. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Sarabiah Jusoh. 2018. Persepsi, amalan dan keberkesanan bimbingan jurulatih SISC+ dari perspektif Guru Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu 8(1): 42–52.
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, hlm. 7th Edisi . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sharifah Sofiah Abdul Rahman & Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. 2017. Pelaksanaan program SIPartners+ dan hubungannya dengan standard kualiti pendidikan Malaysia di Sekolah Menengah. Seminar Serantau 2017 338–354.
Siaw, H. K., Karwan Mustafa Saeed & Abdul Rashid Mohamed. 2019. Instructional coaching as a tool for professional development: Coaches’ roles and considerations. Qualitative Report 24(5): 1106–1132.
Tan, S. Y. 2015. Pelaksanaan program SIPartners+ di Negeri Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Wardani, L. M. I. & Astuti, S. W. 2019. Gambaran kesejahteraan psikologi generasi milenial pengguna media digital di Jakarta Selatan. Anthropological Forum 7(1): 1–14.
Wong, S. H. & Nur Ain Elzira Binti Abdullah. 2018. Bimbingan dan pementoran pembimbing pakar peningkatan sekolah (SISC+) menurut perpspektif guru dibimbing (GDB). International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling 3(13): 57–72.
Zalina Mohd Tahir & Nabihah Mohd Salleh. 2019. Keberkesanan bimbingan Rakan Pembimbing (SIP+) terhadap pentadbir sekolah menerusi hubungan baik dan kemahiran profesional. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan 20: 243–257.
Zhanjia, Z. & Weiyun, C. 2019. A systematic review of measures for psychological well- being in physical activity studies and identification of critical issues. Journal of Affective Disorders 256(March): 473–485.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
