Monitoring Mechanism of Formation and Assessment of the Level of Social Policy of the Enterprise
Keywords:
Social policy, industrial enterprise, social security, social protection.Abstract
The article identifies the factors influencing the effectiveness of the formation and implementation of social policy in an industrial enterprise. To this end, the industrial enterprise conducted a corresponding study, according to the results of which 4 criteria characterizing the level of formation and implementation of the social policy of the enterprise were determined and substantiated. The method of rank correlation and the method of expert evaluations were used to process the research results. It is proposed to determine the optimal level of enterprise’s social policy of the using the method of priorities with the ranking of the types of constituent elements according to the selected characteristics. According to the results of this analysis, the scientific assumption about the dependence of the level of the joint venture on the rational use of the constituent elements of this policy is proved.
Downloads
References
Du, M., Zhao, M. and Fu, Y. (2020) Revisiting urban sustainability from access to jobs: Assessment of economic gain versus loss of social equity. Environmental Impact Assessment
Review, 85, 106456.
Groesser, S.N. and Jovy, N. (2016) Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making. J. Manag. Control, 27, pp. 61–88.
Shai O. (2021) Can conflict lead to pro-social behavior and positive psychological growth?
Economics Letters, 198, 109684.
Stott, C. and Radburn, M. (2020) Understanding crowd conflict: social context, psychology and policing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, pp. 76-80.
Baizan, P. (2020) Linking social class inequalities, labor market status, and fertility: An empirical investigation of second births. Advances in Life Course Research, 46, 100377.
Nachum, L. (2021) Value distribution and markets for social justice in global value chains: Interdependence relationships and government policy. J Int Bus Policy (2021).
Volchkova, O.O. and Krasnov, A.S. (2020) Theoretical and methodological foundations of the political element study as the phenomenon of social being: the theories of unity and conflict. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 26(1), pp. 78-81.
Vedernikov M., Zelena M., Volianska-Savchuk L., Litinska V. and Boiko J. (2020) Management of the Social Package Structure at Industrial Enterprises on the Basis of Cluster Analysis. TEM Journal, 9(1), pp. 249-260.
Voynarenko, M., Vedernikov M., Volianska-Savchuk L., Zelena M., Bazaliyska N. and Baksalova O. (2020) Modeling of Controlling Activity as an Instrument of Influence on Motivation in the Personnel Management System of Industrial Enterprises. In: 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), Deggendorf, Germany, pp. 601-606.
Bäck, A., Ståhl, C., von Thiele Schwarz, U., et al. (2016) Walking the tightrope-perspectives on local politicians’ role in implementing a national social care policy on evidence-based practice. Int J Ment Health Syst. 10, 75.
McKiernan, K. (2021) Social Security reform in the presence of informality. Review of Economic Dynamics, 40, pp. 228-251.
Song, C., Park, K.M. and Kim, Y. (2020) Socio-cultural factors explaining technology-based entrepreneurial activity: Direct and indirect role of social security. Technology in Society, 61, pp. 101246.
Yang J., Tang Z., Yuan Q., Xu, B. (2021) The economic and social benefits of the government- backed credit guarantee fund under the condition of an economic downturn. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, pp. 120632.
Desai, R.M. and Rudra, N. (2019) Trade, poverty, and social protection in developing countries.
EuropeanJournal of Political Economy, 60, pp. 101744.
Layder, D. (2021) Social sciences, social reality and the false division between theory and method: some implications for social research. SN SocSci, 1, 47 (2021).
Bozhikin I., Macke J., da Costa L.F. (2019) The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, pp. 730-747.
Vedernikov, M., Sandyga, I., Volianska-Savchuk, L., Chernushkina, O., Zelena, M. and Koshonko O. (2020) Specificity of Corporate Culture Modeling at Industrial Enterprises in Conditions of Digital Business Transformation. In: 2020 IEEE 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), Deggendorf, Germany, pp. 595-600.
Martynyuk, V., Voynarenko, M., Boiko, J. and Svistunov, O. (2021) Simulation of Photovoltaic System as a Tool of a State’s Energy Security. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, 34(02), pp. 487-492.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
