Stages of Learning and Progression in Mathematics

Authors

  • Tatiana V. Krupa

Keywords:

GlobalLab, grade levels, artificial intelligence, mathematical model, educational pathway, GNU Octave.

Abstract

There is not a country in the world which functions without supplying its schools with teaching content for every grade. This kind of syllabus is called “curriculum”. It is essential to define grade expectations which should fulfill three chief objectives: pinpointing important teaching content, characterizing learning progression which, if properly implemented, will enable students to get ready for professional life and coordinating various mathematical topics. Teachers face a huge variety of learning methods for their students while choosing concrete topics for different grade levels.

There can bedifferent (either low or high) expectations for grade levels of student preparation. Efficient teaching should always comply with learner’s intellectual abilities. Thus, implicit contradiction between meeting grade level expectations and satisfying the personal requirements of students in inevitable. The connection between knowledge and possible grade expectations leads to certain dilemma which includes both subjective and objective points of view. The general aims of the Education 2030 project are about solving this discrepancy.

References

T. V. Krupa, Theoretical studies of the performed for the Stages of the ASR tasks. Moscow: GlobalLab, LLC, 2018.

L. Furukawa, “Trajectory of Learning Experience based on the Performance of Canada's Youth in Mathematics”, International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(6), 62–75, 2018.

G. Lipatnikova, A. S. Polyanina, “The formation of the target component of educational activities of students using decision-making techniques in the framework of the reflexive approach”, Problems and Methods of Teaching Natural Sciences and Mathematics: Materials of the III All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Ekaterinburg, December 2007) (pp. 194-197). Ekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, 2007.

G. Lipatnikova, “The creation on an individual educational thakectory as one of ways to reach students in decision making”, Fundamental researches, 5: 108-110, 2009.

O. A. Granichina, “Mathematical models of the quality control of the educational process in the university with active optimization”, Stokhaisticheskayaoptimizatsiya v informatike, 2: 77-108, 2006. Retrieved from https://www.math.spbu.ru/user/gran/sb2/granolga.pdf

M. Taguma, F. Gabriel, M. H. Lim, “Future of Education and Skills 2030: Curriculum anaktsis:

A synthesis of research on learning trajectories/Progressions in mathematics”, OECD. EDU/EDPC(2018)44/ANN3, 2019.Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030- project/about/documents/A_Synthesis_of_Research_on_Learning_Trajectories_Progressions_in

_Mathematics.pdf

C. Haas, A. Hadjar, “Students’ trajectories through higher education: a review of quantitative research”, Higher Educarion: 1-20, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/S10734-019-00458-5

Anwar, I. Rofiki, “Investigatigating students’ leatning trajectory: a case on triangle”, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1088: 012021, 2018. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012021

“Individual educational trajectory”, University of Tyumen, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.utmn.ru/en/study-with-us/individual-education/

P. Sztajn, J. Confrey, P. H. Wilson, C. Edgington, “Learning Trajectory Based Instructions: Toward a Theory of Teaching”, Educational Researcher, 41 (5): 147-156, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23254092?seq=1

D. Siemon, T. Barkatsas, R. Seah, Researching and Using Progressions (Trajectories) in Mathematics Education. Brill, 2019. ISBN: 9004396446.

D. B. Edwards Jr. The Trajectory of Global Education Policy: Community-Based Management in El Salvador and the Global Reform Agenda. Springer, 2017. ISNB: 1137508752.

E. Merzon, E. Galimullina, E. Ljunimova, “A smart trajectory model for teacher training”, In Cases on Smart Learning Environments (pp. 164-187), 2019. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6136- 1.ch010

D. Johnson, “Comparing the trajectories of educational change and policy transfer in developing

countries”, Oxford Reciew of Education, 32 (5): 679-696, 2006. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4618689?seq=1

M. N. Ryzhkova, “The mathematical model of the process of educayion management”, BestnikCherepovetskogogosudarstvennogouniversiseta, 6: 41-47, 2015. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/matematicheskaya-model-protsessa-upravleniya-obucheniem

P. V. Ovchinnikov, Mathematical Models and Instruments for Designing Adaptive Educational Trajectories for Preparation of Competitive Specialists in Universities: Abstract thesis. Rostov- on-Don, 2014. Retrieved from http://economy-lib.com/matematicheskie-modeli-i- instrumentariy-proektirovaniya-adaptivnyh-obrazovatelnyh-traektoriy-dlya-podgotovki- konkurentosp

S. A. Vdovina, I. M. Kungurova, “The nature and directions of the individual educational trajectory”, Naukovedeniye, 6: 1-8, 2013.

M. Brown, “Six trajectories for Digital Technology in Higher Education”, Educause review, 2015. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/erm1541.pdf

“Transforming Our World, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

A. C. Antoulas (Ed.), Mathematical System Theory. Berlin: Springer, 1991.

J. G. Maree, “Narrative Research in Career Counselling: The Career Construction Interview”, In

L. Sumaya, F. Angelo, K. Sherianne, Transforming Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Case Studies from South Africa (pp. 186-202). Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 2019. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/10.18772/22019032750.17

A. P. Adiredja, “Anti-Deficit Narratives: Engaging the Politics of Research on Mathematical Sense Making”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50 (4): 401-435, 2019. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0401

M. McCartney, The Indian Economy. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing, 2019. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvnjbfk1

R. L. Geiger, American Higher Education since World War II: A History. Princeton University Press, 2019. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv9hvtbz.

M. Ndlovu, “Modeling with Sketchpad to enrich students' concept image of the derivative in introductory calculus: developing domain specific understanding”, 2008. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323120414_Modeling_with_Sketchpad_to_enrich_stu dents'_concept_image_of_the_derivative_in_introductory_calculus_developing_domain_specifi c_understanding

L. Darling-Hammond, L. Flook, C. Cook-Harvey, B. Barron, D. Osher, “Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development”, Applied Developmental Science, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

S. Hidi, K. A. Renninger, “The four-stage model of interest development”, Educational Psychologist, 41 (2): 111-127, 2006. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

A. Pylkin, O. Stroganova, N. Sokolova, M. Pylkina, “The Development of Information Technology and the Problem of Identity”, Proceedings of 8th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing, MECO 2019. Budva, Montenegro, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/MECO.2019.8760159

T.A. Shmygaleva, A.I. Kupchishin, A.A. Kupchishin, C.A. Shafii, “Computer simulation of the energy spectra of PKA in materials irradiated by protons in the framework of the Cascade- Probabilistic method”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 510: 012024, 2019. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/510/1/012024

N. Ivanova, T. Sorokina, “The relationship between the categories “Educational environment” and “Educational space” in Russian psychological and pedagogical science”, RevistaInclusiones, 7 (Esp.): 100-118, 2020.

E. V. Dudukalov, A.B. Laptander, “Obrazovaniyeinauka: kakprodolzhat' modernizatsiyu v usloviyakhretsessii? [Education and science: how to continue the modernization during recession?]”, Naukaiobrazovaniye: khozyaystvoiekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravoiupravleniye, 1: 7-13, 2015.

Bezuk, N. S., &Bieck, M. (1993). Current research on rational numbers and common fractions: Summary and implications for teachers. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 118-136). New York: Macmillan.

Barrett, J., Clements, D., Cullen, C., McCool, J., Witkowski, C., &Klanderman, D. (2009, April). Children’s abstraction of iterative units to measure linear space: A trajectory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). San Diego, California.

Clements, D., &Sarama, J. (2007b). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 461-555). New York: Information Age Publishing.

Freudenthal, H. (1987). Mathematics starting and staying in reality. In I. Wirszup and R. Street

(Eds.), Proceedings of the USCMP Conference on Mathematics Education on Development in School Mathematics around the World, NCTM, Reston, VA.

Edgington, C. (2012). Teachers’ uses of a learning trajectory to support attention to students’ mathematical thinking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC.

Empson, S. B. (2011). On the idea of learning trajectories: Promises and pitfalls. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 571-596.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Krupa, T. V. . (2021). Stages of Learning and Progression in Mathematics. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 5053–5059. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/1412