THE 'STATE TRADITION' IN AUSTRALIA: REASSESSING AN EARLIER VIEW
Abstract
This article seeks to revive interest in an Australian 'state tradition' that has been undergoing continuous development since the first European settlements in the late 1700s and early 1800s. Recent attempts to redefine such a tradition miss many of the foundational elements. There has been a tendency to locate the beginnings in the federal 'settlement' of 1901, and to see as outdated and irrelevant anything that happened before the current mood of marketising and privatising came to dominate our notions of political and economic correctness.
Major changes have of course occurred in the nature of Australian statehood over the years, and they will continue to occur. However an understanding of the tradition restated in this article remains important for several reasons: because that tradition has furnished the foundations of so many of our national institutions; because it provides a standard against which the recent changes can be assessed; and because it will continue to influence and inform challenges to today's economic-rationalist/NPM (New Public Management) paradigm. Such challenges will seek to take us further forward, not backward, but in a style that is inclusive rather than divisive.
References
Bartos, S. (2005) The Uhrig Report: Damp squib or ticking timebomb? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64 (1) pp 96-99.
Benjamin, R. and Duvall, R. (1985) The capitalist state in context. In Benjamin, R. and Elkin, S. (Eds) (1985) The Democratic State. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 19-57.
Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. and Weller, P. (2003) Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81 (1) pp 1-17.
Blainey, G. (1966) The Tyranny of Distance. Sun Books, Melbourne.
Bland, F. (1945) Planning the Modern State (2nd Ed). Angus & Robertson, Sydney.
Bland, Sir H. (1974) First Report of the Board of Inquiry into the Victorian Public Service. Government Printer, Melbourne.
Botsman, P. and Latham, M. (Eds) (2001) The Enabling State: People Before Bureaucracy. Pluto, Sydney.
Brennan, G. and Castles, F. (Eds) (2002) Australia Reshaped: 200 Years of Institutional Transformation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Butlin, N., Barnard, A. and Pincus, J. (1982) Government and Capitalism. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Casey, R. (1949) Double or Quit? Cheshire, Melbourne.
Castles, F. (1985) The Working Class and Welfare: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890-1980. Allen & Unwin/Port Nicholson Press, Wellington.
Castles, F. (1988) Australian Public Policy and Economic Vulnerability. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Clarke, R. and Porter, M. (1982) State enterprise accountability: A contradiction in terms? In Davis, S., Halligan, J., Foley, K., Russell, E., Clarke, R., and Porter, M. (Eds) Quangos: The Problem of Accountability. Monash University, Centre of Policy Studies, Melbourne. 47-69.
Condliffe, J. (1930) New Zealand in the Making. Allen & Unwin, London.
Connell, R. and Irvine, T. (1980) Class Structure in Australian History: Documents, Narrative and Argument. Longmans Cheshire, Melbourne.
Considine, M. (2001) Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare-to-Work. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Crawford, J. (2006) The Creation of States in International Law (2nd Ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Curnow, G. and Saunders, C. (1983) Quangos: The Australian Experience. Hale & Iremonger, Sydney.
Davidson, A. (1991) The Invisible State: The Formation of the Australian State 1788-1901. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Davies, A. (1958) Australian Democracy. Longmans, Melbourne.
Davies, A. (1960) The Government of Victoria. In Davis, S. (Ed.) The Government of the Australian States. Longmans, London. 173-245.
Davis, G. (1998) Australian administrative tradition. In Shafritz, J. (Ed) International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration.Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, CO. 158-160.
Davis, G. and Keating, M. (Eds) 2000. The Future of Governance: Policy Choices. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Davis, G. and Rhodes, R. (2000) From hierarchy to contracts and back again. In Keating, M., Wanna, J. and Weller, P. (Eds), Institutions on the Edge: Capacity for Governance. Allen & Unwin, Sydney. 74-98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
