The Use of Modern Information Technologies is a Necessary Means of Preventing the Conflicts of Legal Interests in the Judicial System of Russia
Keywords:
Conflict of interest, judge, judicial community, information technology.Abstract
The scientific article studies the international and Russian experience of using information technologies to prevent conflicts of legal interests as one of the corruption risks in the judicial activity. The main directions of the development of the judicial system are theoretically substantiated to minimize corruption risks using technical advances. It is concluded that it is necessary to adopt a new version of the Concept of the information policy of the judicial system with clearly fixed legal guarantees for representatives of the judiciary against abuse by other persons, as a result of obtaining information about the activities of the court; a list of the authorities' powers of officials, ensuring control over the reliability and completeness of the information provided on the activities of the courts; the procedure for access, provision, and dissemination of information with the fixation of the requirements as to subjects that disseminate information about the activities of the courts.
Downloads
References
Bajada, C., Shashnov, M. (2019). The effects of economic development and the evolution of social institutions on the level of corruption: comparing the Asia-Pacific with other regional blocs. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(4), 470-500. doi: https://doi.org10.1080/13602381.2019.1589768
cnews.ru. (2001). Romanian police officers were planted on the Internet. Retrieved from: https://www.cnews.ru/news/line/rumynskih_politsejskih_zalozhili_v_internete
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post–Capitalist Society. N.Y.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Retrieved from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej
Finlay, F. (2016). Politics is corrupt, public administration is corrupt, and democracy is dead. Irish Examiner. Retrieved from: https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/arid-20380785.html
Fry, B. R. (1989). Mastering Public Administration; from Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. Chatham House Publishers, New Jersey.
Ghsoub, D. (2018). The Impact of Corruption on the Effectiveness of Public Administration. Lebanese National Defense Magazine, 106.
Henry, N. (1975). Paradigms of Public Administration. Wiley on behalf of the American Society for Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 35(4), 378-386. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/974540
Ibrahim, B., Ahmad, H. A. (2017). The Impact of Corruption on National Development in Nigeria.
International Journal of Scientific Research in Social Sciences & Management Studies, 2(1), 13-21.
Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Retrieved from: http://www.cdep.ru/
Lazarus, L. (2004). Contrasting Prisoners’ Rights: A Comparative Examination of England and Germany.
Oxford University Press, Oxford. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259830.001.0001
Lopez-Iturriaga, F. J., Pastor Sanz, I. (2018). Predicting Public Corruption with Neural Networks: An Analysis of Spanish Provinces. Social indicators research, 140(3), 975-998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1802-2
Loucks, N. (2005). Contrasting Prisoners’ Rights: A Comparative Examination of England and Germany. By Liora Lazarus. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(6), 999-1001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi088
Majcherkiewicz, T., Gadowska, K. (2002). Political clientelism in public administration. A case study of institutional changes in the post-communist state of Poland. The Pedagogical University of Cracow Department of Philosophy and Sociology, 1-11.
Malyniak, B. S., Martyniuk, O. M., Kyrylenko, O. P. (2019). The impact of corruption on the efficiency of public spending across countries with different levels of democracy. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(28), 290-301. doi: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i28.163927
Mills, A. (2012). Causes of corruption in public sector institutions and its impact on development. UNPAN. Retrieved from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan.pdf-
Momotov, V. V. (2019a). Speech at a plenary session of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation. Retrieved from: http://sev.ssrf.ru/news/publikatsii/33443
Momotov, V. V. (2019b). Speech at a plenary session of the 6th Moscow Legal Forum ‘Judicial power in the conditions of modern digital technologies’. Retrieved from: http://ssrf.ru/news/vystuplieniia-intierv-iu- publikatsii/32548
Palidauskaitė, J. (2005). Problems of Corruption and Responsibility in Public Administration. Public Policy and Administration, 1(13), 5, 23-67.
Petukhov, N. A., Ryabtseva, E. V. (2018). Organization of combating corruption and preventing conflicts of interest in judicial activity. Russian Journal of Criminology, 12(5), 651-661.
Shestak, V. A., Volevodz, A. G. (2019). Modern needs of legal support of artificial intelligence. View from Russia. Russian Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 197-206.
Stapenhurst, F., Kpundeh, S. J. (1998). Public Participation in the Fight against Corruption. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 19(3), 491-508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.1998.9669766
Transparency International. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/en/about
Tsirin, A. M., Cherepanova, E. V., Tulinova, O. A. (2014). Modern standards and technologies for combating corruption. Journal of Russian Law, 7, 5-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.